Cervical spinal cord stimulation for prevention and treatment of cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: clinical and radiographic outcomes of a prospective single-center clinical pilot study

BACKGROUND

Cerebral vasospasm induced by aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a major cause of high morbidity and mortality, for which there is no consistently effective treatment. Cervical spinal cord stimulation (cSCS) has been shown to induce vasodilatation and improve peripheral and cerebral blood flow in both animal and human studies. This pilot study was performed to assess the clinical effect and long-term results of cSCS treatment in aSAH patients.

METHODS

This was the first IRB- and US FDA-approved prospective non-randomized non-controlled study comprising of 12 aSAH patients (8 women, 4 men, age range 34-62 years) treated between May and November 2008. All patients underwent up to 2 weeks of cSCS with a single percutaneously implanted 8-contact electrode. Neurological outcomes at discharge and follow-up of up to 13 years and mortality/complications rates were analyzed.

RESULTS

All 12 aSAH patients underwent cSCS electrode implantation immediately after securing the aneurysm. Patients were stimulated for 10-14 consecutive days starting within 3 days of aneurysm rupture. Angiographic vasospasm occurred in six patients; two patients developed new vasospasm-related neurological symptoms; both recovered completely by discharge time. One patient died from unrelated multi-system failure; the rest were followed up clinically (average, 7.5 years; range, 12-151 months) and angiographically (average, 6.5 years; range, 36-125 months). No delayed ischemic neurological deficits/strokes and no cSCS-related adverse effects were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Our short- and long-term data suggest that cSCS is feasible and safe for patients in the acute aSAH settings. Small size of the patient cohort and lack of control do not allow us to conclude whether cSCS is able to prevent cerebral vasospasm, decrease its severity, and improve clinical outcomes in aSAH patients. However, our findings support further clinical trials and development of cSCS as a new concept to prevent and treat cerebral vasospasm.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

CLINICALTRIALS

gov NCT00766844, posted on 10/06/2008.

The Potential Role of Neuromodulation in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

OBJECTIVES

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) continues to be a difficult cerebrovascular disease with limited pharmacologic treatment options. Cerebral vasospasm (CV) and delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) are leading causes of morbidity and mortality after SAH. Despite the advances in the understanding of its pathophysiology and tremendous efforts to date, nimodipine is currently the sole Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment for patients with SAH, with benefits that are marginal at best. The neuromodulation therapies are promising, especially those that target CV and DCI to improve functional outcomes. The aim of this review is therefore to summarize the available evidence for each type of neuromodulation for CV and DCI, with a special focus on its pathophysiological mechanisms, in addition to their clinical utility and drawbacks, which we hope will lead to future translational therapy options after SAH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive review of preclinical and clinical studies demonstrating the use of neuromodulation for SAH. The literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov. A total of 21 articles published from 1992 to 2021 and eight clinical trials were chosen.

RESULTS

The studies reviewed provide a compelling demonstration that neuromodulation is a potentially useful strategy to target multiple mechanisms of DCI and thus to potentially improve functional outcomes from SAH. There are several types of neuromodulation that have been tested to treat CV and DCI, including the trigeminal/vagus/facial nerve stimulation, sphenopalatine ganglion and spinal cord stimulation, transcranial direct electrical stimulation, transcutaneous electrical neurostimulation, and electroacupuncture. Most of them are in the preclinical or early phases of clinical application; however, they show promising results.

CONCLUSIONS

DCI has a complex pathogenesis, making the unique anatomical distribution and pleiotropic capabilities of various types of neuromodulation a promising field of study. We may be at the cusp of a breakthrough in the use of these techniques for the treatment of this stubbornly difficult disease.

The proposed use of cervical spinal cord stimulation for the treatment and prevention of cognitive decline in dementias and neurodegenerative disorders

Cervical spinal cord stimulation is a well-established treatment for intractable neuropathic upper extremity pain. More than 20years ago it was demonstrated that cervical spinal cord stimulation could engender an increase in cerebral blood flow. Cerebral blood flow has been shown to be decreased in many patients with dementia and in various neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease. Furthermore, there is evidence that reduced cerebral blood flow worsens neurodegenerative disease and may also predict which patients progress from mild cognitive impairment to full blown Alzheimer's disease. Thus, the identification of decreased cerebral blood flow in patients with early cognitive problems may offer clinicians a window of opportunity to intervene and prevent further brain damage. Further evidence that supports augmenting cerebral blood flow as an effective strategy for preventing and treating cognitive brain dysfunction comes from experimental studies with omental transposition. The author proposes cervical spinal cord stimulation as a titratable, programmable extracranial neuromodulation technique to increase cerebral blood flow for the purposes of improving cognitive function and preventing cognitive deterioration in patients with dementias and neurodegenerative disorders.

Dorsal column stimulator applications

Background:

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been used to treat neuropathic pain since 1967. Following that, technological progress, among other advances, helped SCS become an effective tool to reduce pain.

Methods:

This article is a non-systematic review of the mechanism of action, indications, results, programming parameters, complications, and cost-effectiveness of SCS.

Results:

In spite of the existence of several studies that try to prove the mechanism of action of SCS, it still remains unknown. The mechanism of action of SCS would be based on the antidromic activation of the dorsal column fibers, which activate the inhibitory interneurons within the dorsal horn. At present, the indications of SCS are being revised constantly, while new applications are being proposed and researched worldwide. Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is the most common indication for SCS, whereas, the complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is the second one. Also, this technique is useful in patients with refractory angina and critical limb ischemia, in whom surgical or endovascular treatment cannot be performed. Further indications may be phantom limb pain, chronic intractable pain located in the head, face, neck, or upper extremities, spinal lumbar stenosis in patients who are not surgical candidates, and others.

Conclusion:

Spinal cord stimulation is a useful tool for neuromodulation, if an accurate patient selection is carried out prior, which should include a trial period. Undoubtedly, this proper selection and a better knowledge of its underlying mechanisms of action, will allow this cutting edge technique to be more acceptable among pain physicians.