Intraorbital wooden foreign body detected by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging

Retained wood penetrating the inferior orbital fissure removed after several months from injury: A case report and a comprehensive literature review

Background

Intraorbital wooden foreign bodies (IOWFBs) constitute a relatively rare ocular trauma. Clinically, it can be difficult to diagnose them due to their wide variety of clinical manifestations. In addition, radiologic diagnosis of IOWFBs is always uncertain and challenging since their low density and low intensity on initial images are identical to air and fat. Therefore, IOWFBs are commonly missed and may not be confirmed for days or months after the initial injury. This article endeavors to contribute to the existing literature on IOWFBs by adding a case of an unusual occurrence of retained wood penetrating the inferior orbital fissure (IOF). To date, there have been no documented instances of a similar occurrence in this particular anatomical location.

Case Description

A 58-year-old female with a history of trauma sustained by a slipping accident 10 months before her referral to our hospital. She underwent multiple surgeries and was referred to us due to persistent right eye pain, periorbital swelling, recurrent eye discharge, and inferior orbital paresthesia. The imaging revealed a retained foreign body located in the right orbital floor inferior to the inferior rectus muscle extending to the sub-temporal fossa through the IOF. The residue was successfully removed without complications.

Conclusion

A history of trauma followed by persistent symptoms should raise the suspicion of a retained foreign body, regardless of the severity of trauma or the time between trauma and clinical presentation. Appropriate and timely imaging, followed by surgical removal, remains the cornerstone of treatment with a favorable prognosis.

[Diagnostics and treatment of organic intraorbital foreign bodies]

BACKGROUND

Orbital injuries with organic foreign bodies are a clinical challenge as they can cause a variety of complications and sometimes lead to irreversible visual impairment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We report five consecutive cases of patients with organic orbital foreign bodies who presented between 2012 and 2022. Documented parameters include age, gender, time of injury, mechanism of injury, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), presence of pain, restriction of motility, performed imaging, location and type of foreign body, treatment and complications.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 61.8 ± 32.3 years and the gender ratio was 4:1 (female:male). In 4 cases the injury had been reported on average 4.6 days (0/14 days min/max) previously. Best corrected visual acuity at first presentation was 0.5 ± 0.2 decimal and after a mean follow-up of 12.7 months (0.5/38 months min/max) at last presentation 0.67 ± 0.3 decimal (p = 0.2). The reason for initial presentation was pain (n = 3) and/or double vision (n = 2). All patients underwent computer tomography (CT). The diagnosis was confirmed in two cases by means of CT. In all five cases the foreign body material could be completely surgically removed, while one patient needed repeated surgery due to retained foreign body material. The organic foreign body material included wood (4) and wax (1). In two cases, a foreign body-induced infection was successfully treated with systemic antibiotics. There were no other complications.

CONCLUSION

In orbital trauma a thorough wound exploration must be performed, especially if the mechanism of injury is uncertain and residual foreign bodies or a perforation injury cannot be excluded. The imaging of choice is CT, which may have to be performed again in the postoperative course.

Clinical analysis of 96 patients with intraorbital foreign bodies: A 10-year retrospective study

Introduction

To investigate the clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and surgical treatment of intraorbital foreign bodies (IOFBs).

Methods

Patients with IOFBs were enrolled from Wuhan Union Hospital between January 2011 and January 2021. Demographic and clinical information was extracted, including gender, age, cause and entrance of the trauma, material, size and quantity of foreign body, visual function, ocular complications, imaging findings, and surgical intervention. The patients were divided into two groups according to the timeline, group A (from January 2011 to December 2015, n = 39) and group B (from January 2016 to January 2021, n = 57).

Results

The 96 patients (81 men and 15 women) were enrolled in this series, with a median age of 39.5 (1.6–76.0) years. Work-related injuries were the cause of IOFBs in 45 individuals (46.9%). Three patients (3.3%) presented severe visual impairment, and 39 patients (42.4%) presented blindness. The majority of foreign bodies were metal (44.8%), followed by wood (26.0%). Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed, respectively, on 89 (92.7%) and 21 (21.9%) patients with IOFBs, in which the detection rate was 80.9% for CT and 81.0% for MRI. Among the 25 patients with intraorbital wooden foreign bodies (IOWFBs), the utilization and detection rates of MRI were 50.0% and 40.0% in group A, and 93.3% and 92.9% in group B, with significant differences in both rates between the two groups (both P < 0.05). The IOWFBs detection rate in MRI was significantly higher than that in CT (78.9% vs. 45.8% overall and 92.9% vs. 53.5% in group B). The detection rates of IOFBs and IOWFBs in initial surgery were statistically different between the two groups, of which the rates were 84.6% and 40.0% in group A and 98.2% and 93.3% in group B. The reoperation rate of IOWFBs in group B (20.0%) was significantly lower than that in group A (70.0%).

Conclusion

IOFBs were mainly caused by work-related injuries and might lead to serious visual impairment. The application and detectability of MRI in IOWFBs improved in recent years, and MRI presented better detectability than CT in diagnosing IOWFBs. Thus, MRI should be recommended despite negative CT findings.

Intraorbital wooden foreign bodies: case series and literature review

Intraorbital wooden foreign bodies (IOWFBs) constitute a relatively rare ocular trauma, which occupy a special type of intraorbital foreign bodies (IOFBs). Data regarding IOWFBs must be obtained from case reports or small case series due to their rarity. Here, we reported 5 cases of IOWFBs and reviewed the related literatures, which could provide comprehensive information regarding the clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and surgical treatment of IOWFBs. Combined with the published literature, a total of 51 independent cases were counted after we added 5 cases. Among them, the number of male and female patients was 35 and 16 respectively; the mean age was 27.3±18.2 (range 1-66)y. Obviously, the disorder seemed to occur mainly in young and middle-aged people. Because of the diversity in the clinical manifestations and imaging characteristics of IOWFBs, misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis often occur during the initial visit. Delayed diagnosis may lead to a high risk of orbital infection caused by IOWFBs. Surgery is the treatment of choice for most patients; however, the missed diagnosis and residue of foreign bodies after previous surgery cannot be ignored. Therefore, an accurate diagnosis is governed by the detailed trauma history, careful ocular examination, close observation of clinical manifestations, correct imaging diagnosis [e.g., magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computerized tomography (CT)], and timely and completely elimination of IOWFBs.

Classification of orbitocranial wooden foreign body penetration injuries: what to do when they violate the intracranial space? A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Orbitocranial wooden foreign body (OWF) penetrations are rare but challenging occurrences that may violate the intracranial space resulting in brain damage and hemorrhagic, as well as infectious, complications. Moreover, there is a specific subset of cases of OWF penetrations that are particularly challenging to treat. Although there are well-defined management guidelines for pure intraorbital localization, there is not yet a defined treatment protocol for foreign bodies reaching the intracranial space. However, their removal performed either directly or through craniotomy, is often easily attainable given the condition that all necessary precautions are accounted for.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

After having treated a 48-year-old man with a transorbital OWF penetration injury at our neurosurgical department, we systematically reviewed the last 15 years of literature to define and summarize the best management strategy. Multiple databases were searched for case reports and case series involving patients with intraorbital and transorbital OWF penetration injuries. For each study, we extracted data on age, sex, imaging modality, type of wood (processed vs. unprocessed), location of periorbital and intracranial entry site, treatment type ("pull and see" or "open and see"), antibiotic therapy, and complications.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

We classified transorbital OWFs into two categories: transorbital with only cavernous sinus involvement and transorbital with more extensive intracranial involvement. We described what we believed was the most appropriate management conduct in each case.

CONCLUSIONS

Grounded on our experience and on the review of the literature, we suggest, based on the anatomical localization of the OWF, a classification system for OWFs which is coupled with a tailored treatment strategy for each case. These suggestions are made to provide surgeons with direction on the correct management of such rare but challenging occurrences.

Long-term ophthalmic anatomical and functional outcomes after surgical removal of intraorbital foreign bodies

PURPOSE

To analyze the anatomical and functional ophthalmic parameters after the surgical removal of various intraorbital foreign bodies.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of medical records was performed featuring detailed history, ophthalmic examination, orbital computed tomographic scans, treatment details, and outcomes. The analyzed anatomical factors included extraocular movements, the position of the eyeball (proptosis, dystopia, and enophthalmos), and fullness of orbital sulci. The functional assessment was based on visual acuity, pupillary reactions, and diplopia. The outcomes were defined as complete, partial, and failure after a minimum follow-up of 1 year.

RESULTS

Of 32 patients, the organic and inorganic intraorbital foreign bodies were surgically removed from 18 (56.25%) and 14 (43.75%) orbits, respectively. At presentation, anatomically the extraocular movement restriction, proptosis/dystopia/enophthalmos, and orbital sulcus fullness were noted in 26 (81.25%), 24 (75%), and 15 (46.88%), respectively. Functionally, diminished visual acuity, diplopia, and pupil abnormalities were seen in 27 (84.38%), 14 (43.75%), and 8 (25%), respectively. After intraorbital foreign body removal at a mean follow-up of 14 months, the improvement of anatomical factors (same sequence) were observed in 8 (30.77%), 20 (83.33%), and 12 (80%), respectively. In functional factors (same sequence), the improvement was noted in none (0%), 13 (92.86%), and 5 (62.5%), respectively. Hence, the majority of patients (n = 20, 62.5%) achieved partial success, while 8 (25%) had complete success. Four (12.5%) had treatment failure despite similar management protocols.

CONCLUSION

The anatomical outcomes are better than the functional outcomes after surgical removal of the intraorbital foreign bodies. The visual acuity does not improve considerably after the surgical removal of intraorbital foreign bodies. Overall, the wooden intraorbital foreign bodies have poorer anatomical and functional prognosis.