A printed information leaflet about MRI and radiologists improves neuroradiology patient health literacy

How to talk to parents

Effective communication with the child and his/her parents is of paramount importance in our daily work in paediatric radiology to establish a trusting relationship and enhance satisfaction for both patients and physicians. Although communication skills and empathy can be effectively taught, and efforts have been made in this area in medical schools, there is still much room for improvement, as communication skills tend to decline throughout medical training. Certain methods are valuable for conducting effective consultations with both the child and the parents, not only when breaking bad news. Paying attention to non-verbal cues can improve our understanding of the family's thoughts and enhance our ability to communicate through all channels. Rethinking the general environment of the department and consultation/ultrasound rooms may also promote effective communication. Having basic knowledge of intercultural communication and strategies for communicating with families with low literacy skills can also be beneficial. In paediatric interventional radiology, specific techniques can be used to better explain the procedure and the concept of risk and to address the family's anxiety.

Health literacy in medical imaging: a scoping review of current evidence and future directions

OBJECTIVE

The importance of health literacy in medical imaging is well recognized, yet the current landscape remains inadequately understood. This study aims to explore the extent of health literacy studies contextualized to medical imaging.

STUDY DESIGN

Scoping review.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted using three online bibliographic databases namely, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and CINAHL. We have adopted the concept of health literacy, as a clinical risk and personal asset, to guide this review.

RESULTS

Of 311 unique articles, 39 met our selection criteria. Five themes (categories) were identified by the authors: appropriate communication with patients who receive medical imaging test results, appropriate usage of medical imaging, classes and characteristics of eHealth literacy, disease/deterioration prevention, and patient education. Additionally, 17 health literacy assessment tools were identified, including 11 original creations. Finally, 11 recommendations have emerged from this scoping review, offering valuable insights into methods, considerations, and strategies for promoting health literacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Health literacy studies in medical imaging cover both clinical and public health perspectives, benefiting diverse populations, regardless of underlying medical conditions. Notably, the majority of assessment tools used in these studies were author-generated, hindering cross-study comparisons. Given the innate capacity of medical images to convey intuitive information, those images do not solely benefit the patients who are given medical imaging examinations, but they also hold significant potential to enhance public health literacy. Health literacy and medical imaging are closely associated and mutually reinforce each other.

Patient Engagement in Neuroradiology: A Narrative Review and Case Studies

The field of patient engagement in radiology is evolving and offers ample opportunities for neuroradiologists to become involved. The patient journey can serve as a model that inspires patient engagement initiatives. The patient journey in radiology may be viewed in 5 stages: 1) awareness that an imaging test is needed, 2) considering having a specific imaging test, 3) access to imaging, 4) imaging service delivery, and 5) ongoing care. Here, we describe patient engagement opportunities based on literature review and paired with case studies by practicing neuroradiologists.

Supporting claustrophobic patients during Magnetic Resonance Imaging examination- the patient perspective

INTRODUCTION

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a common imaging modality used to diagnose disease and monitor treatment. However, some patients cannot complete their MRI examination as a result of claustrophobia. The recent developments in the MRI scanner design may have reduced the incidence of claustrophobia in MRI. This study aimed to explore the claustrophobic patients' experience to better understand how to support them.

METHODS

A qualitative descriptive approach using focus groups was deemed appropriate for the study. The research was advertised in a print newspaper and on social media platforms for eligible participants to contact the researcher. Six claustrophobic patients were recruited to the focus group meeting. The discussion was audio recorded and transcribed. Content analysis was used to analyse the data into code and categories.

RESULTS

Four themes emerged from the data analysis, which included examination preparation, information provision, coping mechanisms and MR scanner design. Participants reported that the confined space in the MRI scanner bore is responsible for their anxiety during MRI. However, the majority of the participants believe that they would be able to complete the examination if, in advance of their scan, they were shown the MRI scanner and what they would be required to do.

CONCLUSION

Several coping mechanisms were shared by the participants on how they were able to complete their MRI examination despite their claustrophobia. MRI radiographers should endeavour to use these mechanisms to support their patients in practice. Also, the findings emphasise the importance of virtual reality and clear communication with patients in preparing them for their MRI examinations.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The findings of this study may be used to enhance claustrophobic patients' experience in MRI. It also identified those aspects of the MRI examination that matter most to patients with claustrophobia in order to provide a suitable intervention to support these patients.

Do health service waiting areas contribute to the health literacy of consumers? A scoping review

Health service waiting areas commonly provide health information, resources and supports for consumers; however, the effect on health literacy and related outcomes remains unclear. This scoping review of the literature aimed to explore the use of waiting areas as a place to contribute to the health literacy and related outcomes of consumers attending health appointments. Articles were included if they focussed on health literacy or health literacy responsiveness (concept) in outpatient or primary care health service waiting areas (context) for adult consumers (population) and were published after 2010. Ten bibliographic databases, one full-text archive, dissertation repositories and web sources were searched. The search yielded 5095 records. After duplicate removal, 3942 title/abstract records were screened and 360 full-text records assessed. Data were charted into a standardized data extraction tool. A total of 116 unique articles (published empirical and grey literature) were included. Most articles were set in primary and community care (49%) waiting areas. A diverse range of health topics and resource types were available, but results demonstrated they were not always used by consumers. Outcomes measured in intervention studies were health knowledge, intentions and other psychological factors, self-reported and observed behaviours, clinical outcomes and health service utilization. Intervention studies overall demonstrated positive trends in health literacy-related outcomes, although the benefit declined after 3-6 months. Research on using waiting areas for health literacy purposes is increasing globally. Future research investigating the needs of consumers to inform optimal intervention design is needed.

Low Back Pain Patients' Perceptions Regarding Their Own Radiology Reports: Pre-Intervention Survey

Purpose

While advanced medical technology and unlimited access to medical information might benefit and empower patients, these same advantages may pose some risks, especially in the cases where patients have direct access to advanced imaging studies. The aim of this work was to evaluate three domains related to patients with lower back pain: the patients' perceptions, misconceptions and the experience of anxiety-related symptoms following direct access to their thoraco-lumbar spine radiology report. An additional aim was the assessment of possible associations with catastrophization.

Patients and Methods

Patients who were referred to the spine clinic, following the completion of a CT or MRI of their thoraco-lumbar spine were surveyed. Patient perceptions of the importance of having direct access to their imaging report and of the concern they attribute to the medical terms found in their report were evaluated using a set of questionnaires. The medical terms severity scores were then correlated to a reference clinical score created for the same medical terms by spine surgeons. Lastly, patients' anxiety-related symptoms and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) after reading their radiology report were evaluated.

Results

Data from 162 participants (44.6% female), with mean age of 53.1 ± 15.6 years, were collected. Sixty-three percent of the patients stated that reading their report helped them gain better understanding of their medical condition and 84% agreed that having early access to the report helped improve communication with the physician. Patients' degree of concern associated with the medical terms in their imaging report ranged between 2.07 and 3.75, on a scale of 1-5. The patient's degree of concerns were significantly higher for six common medical terms and significantly lower in one, when compared to experts' opinions. A mean (± SD) of 2.86±2.79 anxiety-related symptoms was reported. The mean Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PSC) score was 29.18 ±11.86, ranging from 2 to 52. Both the degree of concerns and the number of symptoms reported were significantly associated with the PCS.

Conclusion

Direct access to radiology reports might provoke anxiety symptoms, especially in patients with a tendency for catastrophic thinking. Increasing awareness amongst spine clinicians and radiologist about possible risks associated with direct access to radiology reports could contribute to preventing patients' misconceptions and unnecessary anxiety-related symptoms.