Rapid diffusion-weighted MRI for the investigation of recurrent temporal bone cholesteatoma

Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Head and Neck (Including Temporal Bone)

Diffusion techniques provide valuable information when performing head and neck imaging. This information can be used to detect the presence or absence of pathology, refine differential diagnosis, determine the location for biopsy, assess response to treatment, and prognosticate outcomes. For example, when certain technical factors are taken into consideration, diffusion techniques prove indispensable in assessing for residual cholesteatoma following middle ear surgery. In other scenarios, pretreatment apparent diffusion coefficient values may assist in prognosticating outcomes in laryngeal cancer and likelihood of response to radiation therapy. As diffusion techniques continue to advance, so too will its clinical utility.

Non-EPI versus Multishot EPI DWI in Cholesteatoma Detection: Correlation with Operative Findings

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Although multishot EPI (readout-segmented EPI) has been touted as a robust DWI sequence for cholesteatoma evaluation, its efficacy in disease detection compared with a non-EPI (eg, HASTE) technique is unknown. This study sought to compare the accuracy of readout-segmented EPI with that of HASTE DWI in cholesteatoma detection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was completed of consecutive patients who underwent MR imaging for the evaluation of suspected primary or recurrent/residual cholesteatomas. Included patients had MR imaging examinations that included both HASTE and readout-segmented EPI sequences and confirmed cholesteatomas on a subsequent operation. Two neuroradiologist reviewers assessed all images, with discrepancies resolved by consensus. The ratio of signal intensity between the cerebellum and any observed lesion was noted.

RESULTS

Of 23 included patients, 12 (52.2%) were women (average age, 47.8 [SD, 25.2] years). All patients had surgically confirmed cholesteatomas: Six (26.1%) were primary and 17 (73.9%) were recidivistic. HASTE images correctly identified cholesteatomas in 100.0% of patients. On readout-segmented EPI sequences, 16 (69.6%) were positive, 5 (21.7%) were equivocal, and 2 (8.7%) were falsely negative. Excellent interobserver agreement was noted between reviews on both HASTE (κ = 1.0) and readout-segmented EPI (κ = 0.9) sequences. The average signal intensity ratio was significantly higher on HASTE than in readout-segmented EPI, facilitating enhanced detection (mean difference 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.8; P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

HASTE outperforms readout-segmented EPI in the detection of primary cholesteatoma and disease recidivism.