Differentiation of brain metastases originating from lung and breast cancers using apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis and the relation of histogram parameters with Ki-67

Brain metastases: Comparing clinical radiological differences in patients with lung and breast cancers treated with surgery

Purpose

Brain metastases (BMs) most frequently originate from the primary tumors of the lung and breast. Survival in patients with BM can improve if they are detected early. No studies attempt to consider all potential surgical predictive factors together by including clinical, radiological variables for their recognition.

Methods

The study aims to simultaneously analyze all clinical, radiologic, and surgical variables on a cohort of 314 patients with surgically-treated BMs to recognize the main features and differences between the two histotypes.

Results

The two groups consisted of 179 BM patients from lung cancer (Group A) and 135 patients from breast cancer (Group B). Analysis showed that BMs from breast carcinoma are more likely to appear in younger patients, tend to occur in the infratentorial site and are frequently found in patients who have other metastases outside of the brain (46 %, p = 0.05), particularly in bones. On the other hand, BMs from lung cancer often occur simultaneously with primitive diagnosis, are more commonly cystic, and have a larger edema volume. However, no differences were found in the extent of resection, postoperative complications or the presence of decreased postoperative performance status.

Conclusion

The data presented in this study reveal that while the two most prevalent forms of BM exhibit distinctions with respect to clinical onset, age, tumor location, presence of extra-cranial metastases, and lesion morphology from a strictly surgical standpoint, they are indistinguishable with regard to outcome, demonstrating comparable resection rates and a low risk of complications.

Histograms of computed tomography values in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant osteogenic lesions

BACKGROUND

The use of histogram analysis of computed tomography (CT) values is a potential method for differentiating between benign osteoblastic lesions (BOLs) and malignant osteoblastic lesions (MOLs).

PURPOSE

To explore the diagnostic efficacy of histogram analysis in accurately distinguishing between BOLs and MOLs based on CT values.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 25 BOLs and 25 MOLs, which were confirmed through pathology or imaging follow-up, were included in this study. FireVoxel software was used to process the lesions and obtain various histogram parameters, including mean value, standard deviation, variance, coefficient of variation, skewness, kurtosis, entropy value, and percentiles ranging from 1st to 99th. Statistical tests, such as two independent-sample t-tests and the Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction, were employed to compare the differences in histogram parameters between BOLs and MOLs. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of each parameter.

RESULTS

Significant differences were observed in several histogram parameters between BOLs and MOLs, including the mean value, coefficient of variation, skewness, and various percentiles. Notably, the 25th percentile demonstrated the highest diagnostic efficacy, as indicated by the largest area under the curve in the ROC curve analysis.

CONCLUSION

Histogram analysis of CT values provides valuable diagnostic information for accurately differentiating between BOLs and MOLs. Among the different parameters, the 25th percentile parameter proves to be the most effective in this discrimination process.