Patient-Controlled Analgesia and Peripheral Nerve Block Increase the Risk of Post-operative Urinary Retention after Total Knee Arthroplasty in Asian Patients

Introduction

Post-operative urinary retention (POUR) is a common complication after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and may result in severe complications such as urinary tract infection and deep joint sepsis, leading to prolonged hospital stay and increased medical costs. Hence a retrospective study was performed to identify the incidence and modifiable factors associated with POUR after elective TKA in Asian patients with the aim to prevent POUR and its undesirable consequences.

Materials and Methods

The medical records of 496 consecutive patients who underwent elective TKA between 1 August 2017 and 30 July 2018 were reviewed. There were 154 male (31.0%) and 342 female (69.0%) patients with an average age of 68 years old. The incidence of POUR was analysed with respect to various modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors, including patient demographics, medical comorbidities, duration of surgery, type of intra-operative anaesthesia and post-operative analgesia and early initiation of physiotherapy using univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

A total of 120 (24.2%) of the 496 patients who underwent elective TKA developed POUR. The odds of a patient with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and peripheral nerve block (PNB) developing POUR were 4.2 times and 4.7 times that of a patient without PCA and PNB, respectively. Age, male gender and type of anaesthesia were not found to be significant.

Conclusion

In our study population, the incidence of POUR after elective TKA was 24% with major modifiable risk factors being associated with the use of PCA and PNB as post-operative anaesthesia. POUR can have deleterious effects thus alternative post-operative analgesia should be considered.

Singapore KneE osTeoarthritis CoHort (SKETCH): protocol for a multi-centre prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of global disability. The understanding of the role of psychosocial factors in knee OA outcomes is still evolving particularly in an Asian context. The primary aim of this study is to explore psychosocial factors that prognosticate short and long-term clinical outcomes, productivity, and healthcare utilization in patients with knee OA. Secondary aims are to explore the mediation and directional relationships and the role it plays in predicting the discordance between self-reported measures (SRM), physical-performance measures (PPMs) and objective clinical parameters.

METHODS

A multi-centre prospective cohort study of community ambulant knee OA patients seeking treatment in the tertiary healthcare institutions in Singapore will be conducted. Patients with secondary arthritis, significant cognitive impairment, severe medical comorbidities or previous knee arthroplasty will be excluded. Primary clinical outcome measure is the Knee injury and OA Outcome Score-12 (KOOS-12). Baseline characteristics include sociodemographic status, arthritis status including symptom duration and radiographic severity, comorbidities and functional status through Charlson Comorbidities Index (CCI), Barthel Index (BI) and Parker Mobility Score (PMS). Psychosocial variables include social support, kinesiophobia, negative affect, self-efficacy, injustice, chronic illness shame and the built environment. Clinical outcomes include quality of life, physical performance, global assessment, satisfaction and physical activity levels. Productivity and healthcare utilization will be assessed by a modified OA Cost and Consequences Questionnaire (OCC-Q) and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI). Variables will be collected at baseline, 4, 12 months and yearly thereafter. Regression, mediation and structural equation modelling will be used for analysis.

DISCUSSION

Results will allow contextualization, identification, and phenotyping of the critical (and potentially modifiable) psychosocial parameters that predict positive clinical outcomes in the OA population to guide optimization and refinement of healthcare and community. This will facilitate: 1. identification of high-risk knee OA subpopulations that will likely experience poor outcomes and 2. formulation of targeted multidisciplinary comprehensive approaches to address these psychosocial factors to optimize non-surgical treatment care, maximize functional outcomes and create more value-based care model for knee OA.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has been registered under clinicaltrials.gov registry (Identifier: NCT04942236).

Does Less Pain Predict Better Quality of Life among Malaysian Patients with Mild–Moderate Knee Osteoarthritis?

This study aims to identify the relationship between knee functional status and Health-Related QoL (HRQoL) in mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients and to ascertain which subdomain of knee functional status best predicts good HRQoL. A cross-sectional study was conducted in an orthopaedic clinic of a tertiary hospital in Malaysia. Patients aged 40–75 years old with mild–moderate primary knee OA were recruited. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and SF-36 questionnaires were used to measure knee functional status and HRQoL, respectively. Subdomains of KOOS include “function in daily living”, “function in recreational activities”, “pain”, “symptom”, and “knee-specific quality of life”. Subdomains for SF-36 are Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS). Overall, 290 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria of the study, with a mean age of 66.8 years old (±7.06). Majority were female (57.6%) and Malay (79.7%). The relationships between all KOOS and HRQoL subdomains were significant. “Pain” contributed most towards better physical HRQoL ((PCS) Adj. B (95% CI); 0.063 (0.044, 0.169)), while “function in daily living” contributed most towards better mental HRQoL ((MCS) Adj. B (95% CI); 0.624 (0.478, 0.769)). Thus, better HRQoL was related to better pain control and improved “function in daily living” in these patients.

Correlates, facilitators and barriers of physical activity among primary care patients with prediabetes in Singapore - a mixed methods approach

BACKGROUND

Primary care patients with prediabetes is a priority group in the clinical, organisational and policy contexts. Engaging in regular physical activity is crucial to prevent diabetes for this group. The objectives of the study were to assess factors associated with meeting the recommendation of at least 150 min of moderate/vigorous physical activity weekly, and to explore facilitators and barriers related to the behaviour among primary care patients with prediabetes in Singapore.

METHODS

This was a mixed methods study, consisting of a cross-sectional survey involving 433 participants from 8 polyclinics, and in-depth interviews with 48 of them. Adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) were obtained by mixed effects Poisson regression model. The socio-ecological model (SEM) was applied, and thematic analysis performed.

RESULTS

The prevalence of meeting the recommendation was 65.8%. This was positively associated with being male (aPR 1.21, 95%CI 1.09-1.34), living in 4-5 room public housing (aPR 1.19, 95%CI 1.07-1.31), living in executive flat/private housing (aPR 1.26, 95%CI 1.06-1.50), having family members/friends to exercise with (aPR 1.57, 95%CI 1.38-1.78); and negatively associated with a personal history of osteoarthritis (aPR 0.75, 95%CI 0.59-0.96), as well as time spent sitting or reclining daily (aPR 0.96, 95%CI 0.94-0.98). The recurrent themes for not meeting the recommendation included lacking companionship from family members/friends, medical conditions hindering physical activity (particularly osteoarthritis), lacking knowledge/skills to exercise properly, "no time" to exercise and barriers pertaining to exercise facilities in the neighbourhood. The recurrent themes for meeting the recommendation included family/peer influence, health/well-being concerns and education by healthcare professionals.

CONCLUSIONS

Much more remains to be done to promote physical activity among primary care patients with prediabetes in Singapore. Participants reported facilitators and barriers to physical activity at different levels of the SEM. Apart from the individual and interpersonal levels, practitioners and policy makers need to work together to address the organisational, community and policy barriers to physical activity.