Brain metastases from Truncal and extremity bone and soft tissue sarcoma: Single institution study of oncologic outcomes

Soft tissue tumor imaging in adults: whole-body staging in sarcoma, non-malignant entities requiring special algorithms, pitfalls and special imaging aspects. Guidelines 2024 from the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR)

OBJECTIVES

The revised European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) consensus guidelines on soft tissue tumor imaging represent an update of 2015 after technical advancements, further insights into specific entities, and revised World Health Organization (2020) and AJCC (2017) classifications. This second of three papers covers algorithms once histology is confirmed: (1) standardized whole-body staging, (2) special algorithms for non-malignant entities, and (3) multiplicity, genetic tumor syndromes, and pitfalls.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A validated Delphi method based on peer-reviewed literature was used to derive consensus among a panel of 46 specialized musculoskeletal radiologists from 12 European countries. Statements that had undergone interdisciplinary revision were scored online by the level of agreement (0 to 10) during two iterative rounds, that could result in 'group consensus', 'group agreement', or 'lack of agreement'.

RESULTS

The three sections contain 24 statements with comments. Group consensus was reached in 95.8% and group agreement in 4.2%. For whole-body staging, pulmonary MDCT should be performed in all high-grade sarcomas. Whole-body MRI is preferred for staging bone metastasis, with [18F]FDG-PET/CT as an alternative modality in PET-avid tumors. Patients with alveolar soft part sarcoma, clear cell sarcoma, and angiosarcoma should be screened for brain metastases. Special algorithms are recommended for entities such as rhabdomyosarcoma, extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma, myxoid liposarcoma, and neurofibromatosis type 1 associated malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Satisfaction of search should be avoided in potential multiplicity.

CONCLUSION

Standardized whole-body staging includes pulmonary MDCT in all high-grade sarcomas; entity-dependent modifications and specific algorithms are recommended for sarcomas and non-malignant soft tissue tumors.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

These updated ESSR soft tissue tumor imaging guidelines aim to provide support in decision-making, helping to avoid common pitfalls, by providing general and entity-specific algorithms, techniques, and reporting recommendations for whole-body staging in sarcoma and non-malignant soft tissue tumors.

KEY POINTS

An early, accurate, diagnosis is crucial for the prognosis of patients with soft tissue tumors. These updated guidelines provide best practice expert consensus for standardized imaging algorithms, techniques, and reporting. Standardization can improve the comparability examinations and provide databases for large data analysis.

An Evaluation of Risk Factors for Intracranial Metastases of Sarcomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Sarcomas, a group of neoplasms comprising both tissue and bone soft tissue tumors, has an increasing prevalence in recent years. Prognosis significantly hinges on early detection, and if not detected early, may consequently metastasize. This review will be the first systematic review and meta-analysis characterizing the presentation and progression of brain metastases from bone and soft tissue cancers.

METHODS

The PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were queried to identify studies reporting the incidence of intracranial brain metastases from primary sarcoma to the present. Abstract and full-text screening of 1822 initial articles returned by preliminary search yielded 28 studies for inclusion and data extraction. Qualitative assessment of the studies was conducted in accordance with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale criteria. Meta-analyses were applied to assess risk factors on outcomes.

RESULTS

The average age within the cohort was 27.9 years with a male and female prevalence of 59.1% and 40.9%, respectively. The odds ratio for living status (dead/alive) was calculated for several risk factors - male/female [OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.62, 2.07], single/multiple metastases [OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.35, 1.28], lung metastases/not [OR 1.63, 95% CI 0.85, 3.13], surgery/no surgery [OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.20, 1.21]. The standardized mean differences for duration from diagnoses to metastases were likewise analyzed - male/female [SMD 0.13, 95% CI -0.15, 0.42], single/multiple metastases [SMD 0.11, 95% CI -0.20, 0.42], lung metastases/not [SMD -0.03, 95% CI -0.38, 0.32], surgery/no surgery [SMD 0.45, 95% CI -0.18, 1.09]. The standardized mean differences for duration from metastases to death were analyzed - lung metastases/not [SMD 0.43, 95% CI -0.08, 0.95].

CONCLUSIONS

Our study observed no statistically significant differences in mortality rate among several patient risk factors. Consequentially, there lacks a clear answer as to whether or not an association between mortality rates exists with these patient factors. As such, it is important to continue research in brain-metastasizing sarcomas despite their relative rarity.

Brain metastases of sarcoma: a rare phenomenon in rare tumours

The usual site for distant metastases of sarcoma is lungs, while brain metastasis (BM) occurs much less frequently and usually late in the disease progression. Despite the advancement in cancer treatment, the outcome for patients with brain metastasis is poor, and their lifespan is short. The frequency of BM in sarcoma seems to be affected by the location and histology of the primary tumour. Sarcoma subtypes with a high propensity for brain metastasis are ASPS, leiomyosarcoma and osteosarcoma. There are no clear guidelines for the treatment of sarcoma brain metastasis. However, therapeutic options include surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and are often combined. Targeted therapies are a promising treatment option for sarcoma but require investigation in patients with BM. The following review presents the data on sarcoma brain metastasis incidence, treatment and prognosis.

Intracranial Relapse in Pediatric Sarcoma

Advances in local control techniques, chemotherapy regimens, and imaging modalities have led to improvements in both morbidity and mortality in pediatric sarcoma patients. However, approximately one-third of patients develop disease relapse and intracranial metastasis was considered rare. The incidence of sarcoma brain metastasis is thought to have increased and is associated with grim outcomes. This was a retrospective study of 3 deidentified patient charts illustrating the possibility of the central nervous system as a potential site for pediatric sarcoma relapse and investigate the patterns of such relapses. We note this is the first report of infantile fibrosarcoma brain metastasis and a rare report of sarcoma lymph node metastasis. In addition, each patient was treated with targeted therapies, including entrectinib, Ruxolitnib, and pazopanib. Caregivers in cases 2 and 3 reported new-onset neurological manifestations before identification of new brain metastasis, indicating a lag in detection of new intracranial relapse in asymptomatic sarcoma patients. We suggest implementing a brief review of systems screening tool focused on concerning neurological manifestations to screen for new brain metastasis.

Brain metastasis from a thoracic myxofibrosarcoma: A case report and literature review

Background:

Myxofibrosarcoma (MFS) is a type of sarcoma that mainly affects elderly people; it represents only 5% of all sarcomas and shows no line of differentiation. Intracranial MFS is a rare condition. At present, limited data exist regarding brain metastasis from MFS. This article reports a case of MFS and reviews the literature regarding MFS metastasis.

Case Description:

We report a case of brain metastasis from chest wall MFS. The patient was diagnosed with an anterior thoracic MFS and underwent surgery and radiotherapy. One year later, he noticed a tumor on his left shoulder, and more than 1 year thereafter, bilateral lung metastasis was observed. Twelve months after lung metastasis, he presented to the emergency department and underwent contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, which demonstrated a left frontal tumor suggestive of brain metastasis. Since the main hypothesis was a sarcoma metastasis at the location close to the left motor area, and the patient had a good Karnofsky performance scale, the patient underwent neuronavigation-guided surgery. After surgery, the patient developed Grade III hemiparesis and aphasia. Brain tumor histopathology confirmed a malignant neoplasm with osteosarcomatous differentiation and metastasis from MFS.

Conclusion:

We report a rare case of MFS metastasis. To the best of our knowledge, this is the eighth case of intracerebral metastasis from MFS.

Brain Metastases in Patients With Soft-Tissue Sarcomas: Management and Survival-A SEER Population-Based Cohort Study

Brain metastases (BM) in soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) is associated with poor prognosis. This large population analysis presents (1) demographic and clinical variables of these patients, (2) potential risk factors, (3) impact of BM on overall survival, and (4) treatment strategies.

Novel Insights into the Immunotherapy of Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Do We Need a Change of Perspective?

Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are rare mesenchymal tumors. With more than 80 histological subtypes of STSs, data regarding novel biomarkers of strong prognostic and therapeutic value are very limited. To date, the most important prognostic factor is the tumor grade, and approximately 50% of patients that are diagnosed with high-grade STSs die of metastatic disease within five years. Systemic chemotherapy represents the mainstay of metastatic STSs treatment for decades but induces response in only 15–35% of the patients, irrespective of the histological subtype. In the era of immunotherapy, deciphering the immune cell signatures within the STSs tumors may discriminate immunotherapy responders from non-responders and different immunotherapeutic approaches could be combined based on the predominant cell subpopulations infiltrating the STS tumors. Furthermore, understanding the immune diversity of the STS tumor microenvironment (TME) in different histological subtypes may provide a rationale for stratifying patients according to the TME immune parameters. In this review, we introduce the most important immune cell types infiltrating the STSs tumors and discuss different immunotherapies, as well as promising clinical trials, that would target these immune cells to enhance the antitumor immune responses and improve the prognosis of metastatic STSs patients.