1
|
Wang J, Li Z, Yin H. The Future of Checkpoint Inhibitors in Uveal Melanoma: A Narrative Review. Ophthalmol Ther 2024; 13:1103-1123. [PMID: 38498280 DOI: 10.1007/s40123-024-00913-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Immune checkpoint inhibitors have made tremendous progress over the last decade in the treatment of cutaneous melanoma, but their application in uveal melanoma treatment is less successful, owing in part to the immunological privilege of the eye and the liver, the most frequent site of metastasis. Nevertheless, the therapeutic outcomes reported currently are less pessimistic. METHODS In this review, we provide an overview of recent studies of immune checkpoint inhibitors in uveal melanoma and its metastasis and classify studies in this field into three groups: monotherapy of immune checkpoint inhibitors, dual-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors, and immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with other systemic or regional therapies. RESULTS Briefly, monotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors performed poorly. Dual-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors had slightly better outcomes than traditional treatments, especially in specific patient populations. As for the combination therapy, the combination with other systemic therapies did not show superiority over dual-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors, but combination with hepatic regional therapies was quite promising. Moreover, research on emerging checkpoints is currently limited to the stage of mechanistic studies. CONCLUSION We propose that immune checkpoint inhibitors remain alternative treatments for patients with uveal melanoma, but factors such as cost-effectiveness should also be taken into account. The combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors deserves to be further explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinyu Wang
- West China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, #37 Guoxue Alley, Wuhou District, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Zehua Li
- West China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, #37 Guoxue Alley, Wuhou District, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Hongbo Yin
- Department of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, #37 Guoxue Alley, Wuhou District, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yamada K, Takeuchi M, Fukumoto T, Suzuki M, Kato A, Mizuki Y, Yamada N, Kaneko T, Mizuki N, Horita N. Immune checkpoint inhibitors for metastatic uveal melanoma: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2024; 14:7887. [PMID: 38570507 PMCID: PMC10991441 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55675-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Several studies have evaluated immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for metastatic uveal melanoma; however, the efficacy of ICIs in the previous studies varied greatly. In this systematic review, we searched for prospective or retrospective studies on single or dual-ICIs for metastatic uveal melanoma treatment. A random-effect model meta-analysis with generic inverse-variance was conducted, and 36 articles representing 41 cohorts of 1414 patients with metastatic uveal melanoma were included. The pooled outcomes were as follows: objective response rate (ORR) was 5.6% (95% confidence interval [95%CI] 3.7-7.5%; I2, 36%), disease control rate (DCR) was 32.5% (95% CI 27.2-37.7%; I2, 73%), median progression-free survival was 2.8 months (95% CI 2.7-2.9 months; I2, 26%), and median overall survival (OS) was 11.2 months (95% CI 9.6-13.2 months; I2, 74%). Compared to single-agent ICI, dual ICI led to better ORR (single-agent: 3.4% [95% CI 1.8-5.1]; dual-agent: 12.4% [95% CI 8.0-16.9]; P < 0.001), DCR (single-agent: 29.3%, [95% CI 23.4-35.2]; dual-agent: 44.3% [95% CI 31.7-56.8]; P = 0.03), and OS (single-agent: 9.8 months [95% CI 8.0-12.2]; dual-agent: 16.3 months [95% CI 13.5-19.7]; P < 0.001). Our analysis provided treatment outcomes as described above. Dual-ICIs appear better than single-agent ICIs for the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kayoko Yamada
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan
| | - Masaki Takeuchi
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan.
| | - Takeshi Fukumoto
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Internal Related, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Minako Suzuki
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan
| | - Ai Kato
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan
| | - Yuki Mizuki
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan
| | - Norihiro Yamada
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan
| | - Takeshi Kaneko
- Department of Pulmonology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Nobuhisa Mizuki
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Horita
- Chemotherapy Center, Yokohama City University Hospital, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Eteghadi A, Ebrahimi M, Keshel SH. New immunotherapy approaches as the most effective treatment for uveal melanoma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 194:104260. [PMID: 38199429 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2023] [Revised: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults. Conventional methods of UM treatment are based on chemotherapy and radiotherapy, which have been able to control tumor growth in a limited way. But due to the inadequacy and many side effects of these treatments, many UM patients die during treatment, and approximately 50% of patients develop metastasis. Meanwhile, the 2-year survival rate of these patients from the time of metastasis is 8%. Since immunotherapy has the potential to be the most specific and efficient method in the treatment of tumors, it is considered an attractive and promising research field in the treatment of UM. This review highlights recent advances in UM immunotherapy and provides new immunological approaches on how to overcome the challenges of UM immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atefeh Eteghadi
- Department of Tissue Engineering and Applied Cell Sciences, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Maryam Ebrahimi
- Medical Nanotechnology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Saeed Heidari Keshel
- Department of Tissue Engineering and Applied Cell Sciences, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Medical Nanotechnology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Khan SA, Almalki WH, Arora S, Kesharwani P. Recent approaches for the treatment of uveal melanoma: Opportunities and challenges. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 193:104218. [PMID: 38040071 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most prevalent primary intraocular cancer in adult population. Primary methods for treatment of UM involves surgery Proton Beam Therapy (PBT), Plaque Brachytherapy, phototherapy, and Charged Particle Radiation Therapy (CPT). It has been found that approximately 50 % of patients diagnosed with UM ultimately experience development of metastatic disease. Furthermore, it has been identified that majority of the patient experience metastasis in liver with a prevalence of 95 %. Management of metastatic UM (MUM) involves various therapeutic modalities, including systemic chemotherapy, molecular targeted therapy, immunotherapy and liver directed interventions. We outline gene mutation in UM and addresses various treatment modalities, including molecular targeted therapy, miRNA-based therapy, and immunotherapy. Additionally, inclusion of ongoing clinical trials aimed at developing novel therapeutic options for management of UM are also mentioned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sauban Ahmed Khan
- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi 110062, India
| | - Waleed H Almalki
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Swaranjeet Arora
- Department of Finance and Management, Lal Bahadur Shastri Institute of Management, 11/07 Dwarka Sector 11, Near Metro Station, New Delhi, Delhi 110075, India
| | - Prashant Kesharwani
- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi 110062, India.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pham JP, On L, Ardolino L, Hurwitz J, Salaun H, Sim HW, Joshua AM. Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibition in metastatic uveal melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Melanoma Res 2023; 33:316-325. [PMID: 37199712 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
Metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) has historically been associated with short survival and limited effective treatments. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been trialed in mUM; however, robust conclusions regarding their efficacy are difficult to draw given small study sizes and heterogeneous patient populations. Five databases were searched using a combination of 'ICI' and 'mUM' headings, and data on patient demographics, objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were extracted. Pooled ORR was calculated using a random effects model and the inverse variance method. Available Kaplan-Meier OS and PFS curves were used to construct summary OS and PFS plots, from which median values were derived. Pooled ORR was 9.2% overall (95% CI 7.2-11.8) [4.1% for anti-CTLA4 (95% CI 2.1-7.7), 7.1% for anti-PD(L)1 (95% CI 4.5-10.9) and 13.5% for anti-CTLA4 plus anti-PD1 (95% CI 10.0-18.0)]. Median OS was 11.5 months overall (95% CI 9.5-13.8) [8.0 months for anti-CTLA4 (95% CI 5.5-9.9), 11.7 months for anti-PD(L)1 (95% CI 9.0-14.0) and 16.0 months for ipilimumab plus anti-PD1 (95% CI 11.5-17.7) ( P < 0.001)]. Median PFS was 3.0 months overall (95% CI 2.9-3.1). ICIs have limited efficacy in mUM and a recommendation for their use must consider the balance of benefit and risk for individual patients if no other options are available. Further biomarker profiling studies may be helpful in assessing which patients will benefit from ICIs, in particular the addition of ipilimumab to anti-PD1 therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James P Pham
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, St. Vincent's Hospital Sydney
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst
| | - Lawrence On
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst
- Department of Ophthalmology, Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Luke Ardolino
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, St. Vincent's Hospital Sydney
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst
| | - Joshua Hurwitz
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, St. Vincent's Hospital Sydney
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst
| | - Helene Salaun
- Department of Medical Oncology, PSL Research University, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Hao-Wen Sim
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, St. Vincent's Hospital Sydney
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst
- Department of Medical Oncology, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown
| | - Anthony M Joshua
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, St. Vincent's Hospital Sydney
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, North Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vavolizza RD, Petroni GR, Mauldin IS, Chianese-Bullock KA, Olson WC, Smith KT, Dengel LT, Haden K, Grosh WW, Kaur V, Varhegyi N, Gaughan EM, Slingluff CL. Phase I/II clinical trial of a helper peptide vaccine plus PD-1 blockade in PD-1 antibody-naïve and PD-1 antibody-experienced patients with melanoma (MEL64). J Immunother Cancer 2022; 10:e005424. [PMID: 36100309 PMCID: PMC9472210 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2022-005424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A vaccine containing 6 melanoma-associated peptides to stimulate helper T cells (6MHP) is safe, immunogenic, and clinically active. A phase I/II trial was designed to evaluate safety and immunogenicity of 6MHP vaccines plus programmed death 1 (PD-1) blockade. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS Participants with advanced melanoma received 6MHP vaccines in an incomplete Freund's adjuvant (6 vaccines over 12 weeks). Pembrolizumab was administered intravenously every 3 weeks. Tumor biopsies at baseline and day 22 were analyzed by multiplex immunohistochemistry. Primary end points were safety (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events V.4.03) and immunogenicity (ex vivo interferon-γ ELISpot assay). Additional end points included changes in the tumor microenvironment (TME) and clinical outcomes. RESULTS Twenty-two eligible participants were treated: 6 naïve to PD-1 antibody (Ab) and 16 PD-1 Ab-experienced. Median follow-up was 24.4 months. Most common treatment-related adverse events (any grade) included injection site reactions, fatigue, anemia, lymphopenia, fever, elevated aspartate aminotransferase, pruritus, and rash. Treatment-related dose-limiting toxicities were observed in 3 (14%) participants, which did not cross the study safety bound. A high durable T cell response (Rsp) to 6MHP was detected in only one participant, but twofold T cell Rsps to 6MHP were detected in 7/22 (32%; 90% CI (16% to 52%)) by week 13. Objective clinical responses were observed in 23% (1 complete response, 4 partial responses), including 4/6 PD-1 Ab-naïve (67%) and 1/16 PD-1 Ab-experienced (6%). Overall survival (OS) was longer for PD-1 Ab-naïve than Ab-experienced participants (HR 6.3 (90% CI (2.1 to 28.7)). In landmark analyses at 13 weeks, OS was also longer for those with T cell Rsps (HR 6.5 (90% CI (2.1 to 29.2)) and for those with objective clinical responses. TME evaluation revealed increased densities of CD8+ T cells, CD20+ B cells, and Tbet+ cells by day 22. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with the 6MHP vaccine plus pembrolizumab was safe, increased intratumoral lymphocytes, and induced T cell Rsps associated with prolonged OS. The low T cell Rsp rate in PD-1 Ab-experienced participants corroborates prior murine studies that caution against delaying cancer vaccines until after PD-1 blockade. The promising objective response rate and OS in PD-1 Ab-naïve participants support consideration of a larger study in that setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rick Daniel Vavolizza
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Gina R Petroni
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Ileana S Mauldin
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | | | - Walter C Olson
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Kelly T Smith
- Cancer Center and Office of Research Core Administration, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Lynn T Dengel
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Kathleen Haden
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - William W Grosh
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Varinder Kaur
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Nikole Varhegyi
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Elizabeth M Gaughan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Craig L Slingluff
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Recent Advances and Challenges in Uveal Melanoma Immunotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14133094. [PMID: 35804863 PMCID: PMC9264803 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2022] [Revised: 06/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults. Although it can be controlled locally, half of the patients still develop metastases. To date, there have been no standard therapeutic strategies for the prevention or treatment of metastases. Existing therapies, such as chemotherapy and targeted therapies, induce only minimal responses. This review focuses on newly published research on immunotherapy. We highlight expanding treatments and their clinical outcomes, as well as propose promising new treatments and feasible checkpoints. Based on these findings, we provide innovative insights into feasible strategies for the treatment of patients with uveal melanoma. Abstract Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults. Compared to cutaneous melanoma (CM), which mainly harbors BRAF or NRAS mutations, UM predominantly harbors GNAQ or GNA11 mutations. Although primary UM can be controlled locally, approximately 50% of patients still develop metastases. To date, there have been no standard therapeutic strategies for the prevention or treatment of metastases. Unfortunately, chemotherapy and targeted therapies only induce minimal responses in patients with metastatic UM, with a median survival time of only 4–5 months after metastasis detection. Immunotherapy agents, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, have achieved pioneering outcomes in CM but have shown limited effects in UM. Researchers have explored several feasible checkpoints to identify options for future therapies. Cancer vaccines have shown little in the way of therapeutic benefit in patients with UM, and there are few ongoing trials providing favorable evidence, but adoptive cell transfer-related therapies seem promising and deserve further investigation. More recently, the immune-mobilizing monoclonal T-cell receptor against the cancer molecule tebentafusp showed impressive antitumor effects. Meanwhile, oncolytic viruses and small molecule inhibitors have also gained ground. This review highlights recent progress in burgeoning treatments and provides innovative insights on feasible strategies for the treatment of UM.
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhang Z, Su J, Li L, Du W. Identification of Precise Therapeutic Targets and Characteristic Prognostic Genes Based on Immune Gene Characteristics in Uveal Melanoma. Front Cell Dev Biol 2021; 9:666462. [PMID: 34124047 PMCID: PMC8187912 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.666462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The tumor microenvironment is an important factor for the immunotherapy of tumor patients. The sequenced transcriptome data can be used to describe the tumor microenvironment and various immune subtypes. We exploited published data on patients with uveal melanoma (UVM) to identify immune subtypes. Based on the immune-related gene sets of 80 patients with UVM in the TCGA database, we used consensus clustering to identify two immune subgroups. In the two immune subtypes, we analyzed clinical characteristics and immune infiltration. Class1 has low immune infiltration, contains memory B cells, Th2 cells, Th17 cells, eosinophils, natural killer cells, and has a better prognosis. Class2 has higher immune infiltration. CD8+ T cells, Th1 cells, MDSCs, and Dendritic cells are enriched in class2, which has strong cytolytic activity, high expression of immune checkpoint genes, and poor outcome. Moreover, we have developed and verified an immune characteristic model that can predict the prognosis of patients well. Through this model, we screened prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (PTGS2) as the therapeutic target of UVM. Treatment of choroidal melanoma cell line (OCM1) cells with celecoxib (an inhibitor of PTGS2) effectively inhibits cell growth, proliferation, and promotes apoptosis. Our results show the immunological heterogeneity of UVM patients and also provide an ideal therapeutic target for the future treatment design of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Li Li
- State Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology, Department of Cell Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medicine, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wenjing Du
- State Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology, Department of Cell Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medicine, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|