Treosulfan-based conditioning for inborn errors of immunity

Treosulfan vs busulfan conditioning for allogeneic bmt in children with nonmalignant disease: a randomized phase 2 trial

Optimal conditioning prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for children with non-malignant diseases is subject of ongoing research. This prospective, randomized, phase 2 trial compared safety and efficacy of busulfan with treosulfan based preparative regimens. Children with non-malignant diseases received fludarabine and either intravenous (IV) busulfan (4.8 to 3.2 mg/kg/day) or IV treosulfan (10, 12, or 14 g/m2/day). Thiotepa administration (2 × 5 mg/kg) was at the investigator's discretion. Primary endpoint was freedom from transplantation (treatment)-related mortality (freedom from TRM), defined as death between Days -7 and +100. Overall, 101 patients (busulfan 50, treosulfan 51) with at least 12 months follow-up were analyzed. Freedom from TRM was 90.0% (95% CI: 78.2%, 96.7%) after busulfan and 100.0% (95% CI: 93.0%, 100.0%) after treosulfan. Secondary outcomes (transplantation-related mortality [12.0% versus 3.9%]) and overall survival (88.0% versus 96.1%) favored treosulfan. Graft failure was more common after treosulfan (n = 11), than after busulfan (n = 2) while all patients were rescued by second procedures except one busulfan patient. CTCAE Grade III adverse events were similar in both groups. This study confirmed treosulfan to be an excellent alternative to busulfan and can be safely used for conditioning treatment in children with non-malignant disease.

Effect of busulfan and treosulfan on gonadal function after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in children and adolescents with nonmalignant diseases is not exposure-dependent

With an increasing number of young patients surviving into adulthood after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), gonadal dysfunction becomes an important late effect with significant impact on quality of life. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the exposure of busulfan (BU) and treosulfan (TREO) in relation to gonadal function in pediatric patients transplanted for a nonmalignant disease between 1997 and 2018. In the BU cohort, 56 patients could be evaluated and gonadal dysfunction occurred in 35 (63%) patients. Lower BU exposure (cumulative area under the curve cAUC <70 mg*h/L) was not associated with a reduced risk of gonadal dysfunction (OR 0.92 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25-3.49, p=0.90). In the TREO cohort, 32 patients were evaluable and gonadal insufficiency occurred in 9 patients (28%). Lower TREO exposure (AUC <1750 mg*h/L on day 1) was not associated with a reduced risk of gonadal dysfunction (OR 1.6 95%CI 0.16-36.6, p=0.71). Our data do not support the premise that reduced intensity BU-based conditioning lowers the risk for gonadal toxicity and it is unlikely that TDM-based reduced treosulfan exposure will further limit the risk for gonadal dysfunction.

Personalized hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for inborn errors of immunity

Patients with inborn errors of immunity (IEI) have been transplanted for more than 50 years. Many long-term survivors have ongoing medical issues showing the need for further improvements in how hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is performed if patients in the future are to have a normal quality of life. Precise genetic diagnosis enables early treatment before recurrent infection, autoimmunity and organ impairment occur. Newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) is established in many countries. For newly described disorders the decision to transplant is not straight-forward. Specific biologic therapies are effective for some diseases and can be used as a bridge to HSCT to improve outcome. Developments in reduced toxicity conditioning and methods of T-cell depletion for mismatched donors have made transplant an option for all eligible patients. Further refinements in conditioning plus precise graft composition and additional cellular therapy are emerging as techniques to personalize the approach to HSCT for each patient.