Differential effects of donor lymphocyte infusion upon treatment response and GVHD according to relapse level and donor sources in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome

Explorations of post-gDLI low-dose cyclophosphamide for preventing severe aGVHD

OBJECTIVE

Relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a serious life-threatening complication. The granulocyte colony-stimulated factor mobilized donor lymphocyte infusions (gDLI) combined with chemotherapy is currently a commonly used treatment method. Nevertheless, gDLI may cause so severe acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) as to impact prognosis. Posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has been the backbone for GVHD prophylaxis by inducing tolerance to minor histocompatibility antigens in recipients, while the application of post-gDLI low-dose cyclophosphamide (PDCy) for GVHD prophylaxis has not yet been attempted.

METHODS

To explore this possibility, a retrospective study was conducted. 20 patients relapsing after HSCT were administered 20 mg/kg/d cyclophosphamide（Cy）on day 3 (for matched related transplantation) or on days 3 and 4 (for haplo-identical or unrelated transplantation) after gDLI to prevent aGVHD (the PDCy group). Furthermore, through propensity score matching, 58 matched controls received other (for HID and URD) or no (for MSD) immunosuppressive therapy for GVHD prophylaxis (the Non-Cy group).

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 4.8 (0-37.1) months, the PDCy group had lower cumulative incidence of severe aGVHD (III-IV, 5 % vs 31 %, p = 0.02; II-IV, 25 % vs 52 %, p = 0.04), but no significant differences existed in 4-month OS (64 % vs 59 %, p = 0.51), 4-month CIR (20 % vs 47 %, p = 0.11), rates of objective response (68.8 % vs 54.5 %, p = 0.6) (hematological or extramedullary relapse), MRD complete response (25 % vs 42 % p = 1) and MRD response (25 % vs 50 %, p = 0.6) (molecular relapse) between the PDCy group and the Non-Cy group. The PDCy regimen didn't increase the incidence of adverse infection, hemorrhagic cystitis, and cardiac events.

CONCLUSION

On the premise of safety, the PDCy regimen could effectively protest against severe aGVHD after gDLI while preserving therapeutic response rates. However, the research results still require verification through longer follow-up and large prospective randomized studies.

Limited Efficacy of Venetoclax Combination Regimens in Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Extramedullary Relapse

The recently approved BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) has achieved promising outcomes in new and relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Although its use is not well established in R/R AML with extramedullary disease (EMD), some reports have shown promising outcomes. We retrospectively analyzed 11 patients of R/R AML with EMD (with (n = 4) or without (n = 7) concurrent marrow involvement), who were treated with VEN plus decitabine (n = 9) or low-dose cytarabine (n = 2) between May 2020 and October 2020 in Seoul St. Mary's Hospital. The median number of prior treatment lines was 3 (1-6), and most (n = 9, 81.8%) had multiple sites of EMD. Nine patients (81.8%) received concurrent therapy for extramedullary (EM) involvement sites with radiotherapy (RT) (n = 4), surgery (n = 1), and both of them (n = 4). Among 11 patients, 4 patients (36.4%) had either marrow or EM responses to VEN combination; EM response was seen in 1 patient (9.1%, partial response) who had received concurrent RT (25 Gy, 10 fx) during the 1st cycle of VEN combination, and other 3 patients showed marrow response without EM response. After median follow-up of 27.0 months, the median overall survival was estimated to be 5.4 months. To conclude, VEN combination regimens have shown only modest efficacy in EM recurrence of AML with little impact on eliciting EM response.

A Multicenter Phase 2 Clinical Trial of 10-Day Decitabine, Dose-Escalated Donor Lymphocyte Infusion, and Ruxolitinib for Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Post-transplantation relapse of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes has a poor prognosis. Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is one treatment approach. However, efficacy is limited, and toxicity, mostly in the form of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), is frequent. We tested a novel approach using 10-day decitabine, dose-escalated DLI, and ruxolitinib in a multicenter phase 2 trial aimed at increasing the efficacy of DLI and reducing its toxicity. Up to four 28-day cycles were administered. The primary endpoint was 6-month overall survival (OS). Of the 14 patients who started cycle 1, 13 received 1 DLI, 6 received 2 DLIs, and 1 received 3 4 DLIs. A preplanned interim analysis after enrolling 14 patients suggested futility, and the trial was closed to accrual. The final analysis showed a 6-month OS of 36% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18 to 72), a 1-year progression-free survival of 7% (95% CI, 1% to 47%), a 6-month cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD of 57% (95% CI, 26% to 80%), and a 1-year nonrelapse mortality of 14% (95% CI, 2% to 38%). The combined modality treatment studied in this trial was ineffective and did not reduce DLI toxicity.

Ruxolitinib on acute graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after modified donor lymphocyte infusion

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of ruxolitinib on acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) prophylaxis and its impact on graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect in patients after modified donor lymphocyte infusion (mDLI).

METHODS

We retrospectively included patients with relapsed leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) who received ruxolitinib prophylaxis between October 2018 and April 2020. The incidence of aGVHD, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment safety were evaluated.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients were followed up for a median time of 8 months (range: 1-26 months). The incidence of aGVHD on Day 30 after mDLI was 41.2% and ranged from Grade 1 to 4; ten of 17 patients (58.8%) achieved a complete response (CR), and two (11.8%) had a partial response (PR). Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation rate was 23.5%, and the median time from mDLI to CMV reactivation was 48.5 days. The mean DFS and OS after mDLI were 1.0 (95% CI 0.0-3.5) and 9.0 (95% CI 1.2-16.8) months, respectively. The causes of death for 10 patients were leukemia relapse (n = 5), aGVHD and septic shock (n = 3), intracranial lesion (n = 1), and COVID-19 (n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

We reported encouraging results of ruxolitinib monotherapy in the prevention of aGVHD and maintenance of GVL for post-transplantation relapsed patients, even though being at high risk with poor initial prognosis.