Serum endocan and endothelial dysfunction in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia survivors: a tertiary center experience

Endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphism (786T/C) in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia survivors

OBJECTIVES

To detect eNOS gene polymorphism and its relation to cardiovascular complications in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) survivors.

METHODS

CBC, renal and liver function tests, lipid profile, Carotid artery Intima Media Thickness (CIMT), and Brachial artery Intima Media Thickness (BIMT). eNOS gene polymorphism was done in 40 childhood ALL survivors and 40 controls.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between survivors and control groups regarding 786 T/C polymorphism. There was a significant increase in serum cholesterol, TGs, LDL, VLDL, and HbA1c in the TC and CC group more than in the TT group, while there was a significant decrease in serum HDL in the TC and CC group more than in the TT group. There was no significant difference as regards echocardiography findings between different polymorphisms of 786 T/C, but there was a significant difference between 786 T/C groups with regard to the carotid and brachial arteries intima media thickness (IMT) measurements being significantly higher in the TC and CC group more than in the TT group.

CONCLUSION

Carotid and brachial arteries intima media thickness measurements were higher in the survivors when compared to healthy controls. eNOS gene polymorphism may play a role in modifying or developing CVD in pediatric ALL survivors.

Endocan in Acute Leukemia: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives

Endocan is a soluble dermatan sulfate proteoglycan expressed by endothelial cells and detected in serum/plasma. Its expression is increased in tumors/tumor vessels in several human malignancies, and high expression (high serum/plasma levels or tumor levels) has an adverse prognostic impact in several malignancies. The p14 endocan degradation product can also be detected in serum/plasma, but previous clinical studies as well as previously unpublished results presented in this review suggest that endocan and p14 endocan fragment levels reflect different biological characteristics, and the endocan levels seem to reflect the disease heterogeneity in acute leukemia better than the p14 fragment levels. Furthermore, decreased systemic endocan levels in previously immunocompetent sepsis patients are associated with later severe respiratory complications, but it is not known whether this is true also for immunocompromised acute leukemia patients. Finally, endocan is associated with increased early nonrelapse mortality in (acute leukemia) patients receiving allogeneic stem cell transplantation, and this adverse prognostic impact seems to be independent of the adverse impact of excessive fluid overload. Systemic endocan levels may also become important to predict cytokine release syndrome after immunotherapy/haploidentical transplantation, and in the long-term follow-up of acute leukemia survivors with regard to cardiovascular risk. Therapeutic targeting of endocan is now possible, and the possible role of endocan in acute leukemia should be further investigated to clarify whether the therapeutic strategy should also be considered.

Endothelial Dysfunction in Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Narrative Review

Assessment of endothelial dysfunction in cancer survivors may have a role in the early identification of non-communicable diseases and cardiovascular late effects. Oncological therapies may impair endothelial function. Therefore, in patients such as childhood cancer survivors who could benefit from early cardioprotective pharmacological interventions, it is essential to monitor endothelial function, even if the optimal methodology for investigating the multifaceted aspects of endothelial dysfunction is still under debate. Biochemical markers, as well as invasive and non-invasive tools with and without pharmacological stimuli have been studied. Human clinical studies that have examined lifestyle or cancer treatment protocols have yielded evidence showing the involvement of lipid and lipoprotein levels, glycemic control, blood pressure, adiposity, inflammation, and oxidative stress markers on the state of endothelial health and its role as an early indicator of cardiometabolic risk. However, with regards to pharmacological interventions, cautious interpretation of the result attained whilst monitoring the endothelial function is warranted due to methodological limitations and substantial heterogeneity of the results reported in the published studies. In this narrative review, an overview of evidence from human clinical trials examining the effects of cancer therapies on endothelial disease is provided together with a discussion of endothelial function assessment using the different non-invasive techniques available for researchers and clinicians, in recent years.