A primer on common supplements and dietary measures used by patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Key Focus Areas in Pouchitis Therapeutic Status: A Narrative Review

Pouchitis, as the most common complication after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), has an incidence from 7% to 46%. Pouchitis treatment still represents one of the biggest gaps of knowledge in the treatment of diseases. This review has focused on achievements and challenges in the treatment of pouchitis. A combined assessment of symptoms, endoscopic findings, histologic results, quick biomarkers, and fecal calprotectin test were determined to be valuable diagnostic criteria. Conventional therapy was described as a modification of bacterial flora, mainly with antibiotics and more recently with probiotics such as bifidobacteria, lactobacilli, and streptococci. Other therapeutic approaches such as anti-tumor necrosis factor, infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, tacrolimus, tofacitinib, thiopurines, corticosteroids, prolyl hydroxylase-containing enzymes, povidone-iodine, dextrose spray, fecal microbiota transplantation, herbal medicines, and leukocyte apheresis have been discussed. Changes in dietary components, and administration of complementary and alternative medicine, probiotics, and fecal transplantation in addition to conventional therapies were also shown to affect the outcome of disease. Due to the potential significant impairment in quality of life caused by pouchitis, it is essential to address the gaps in knowledge for both patients and physicians in its treatment. Therefore, well-designed and adequately powered studies should assess the optimal treatment for pouchitis.

Potential Diagnostic Role of Hepcidin in Anemic Patients Affected by Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Anemia is the main extraintestinal comorbidity of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). Differentiating the type of anemia in these disorders is still a challenge. Hepcidin could be a promising biomarker to identify iron deficiency anemia (IDA), anemia of chronic disease (ACD) and the concomitant presence of both IDA and ACD.

METHODS

To evaluate the potential role of hepcidin dosage in the management of anemia in IBD patients, we performed a systematic review by a comprehensive literature analysis of original papers reporting the dosage of hepcidin in IBD patients. In all the articles reviewed, the dosage of ferritin was reported, and the correlation between hepcidin and ferritin has been used to compare these two biomarkers.

RESULTS

A total of 12 articles concerning the dosage of hepcidin in IBD were included, comprising in total of 976 patients. The results of the hepcidin values in IBD patients when compared with controls were conflicting. In fact, four articles described an increase in this biomarker, three showed a decrease and five did not find significant differences. The correlation with ferritin was positive and significant. In three studies, some differences between hepcidin dosages and ferritin levels indicate a possible role when IDA and ACD could be present at the same time.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the contradictory data of the studies, the diagnostic role of hepcidin as a biomarker remains elusive in IBD patients. These differences could be due to the clinical characteristics of the patients enrolled that should be better defined in the future. A suitable clinical trial should be designed to outline the possible role of hepcidin in differentiating IDA, ACD and concomitant IDA and ACD in IBD patients. At the moment, ferritin still remains the best marker to diagnose these conditions, in addition to hemoglobin, transferrin saturation and CRP as recommended by the ECCO guidelines.