1
|
Wendt G, Faul F. Binocular luster elicited by isoluminant chromatic stimuli relies on mechanisms similar to those in the achromatic case. J Vis 2024; 24:7. [PMID: 38536184 PMCID: PMC10985784 DOI: 10.1167/jov.24.3.7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
The phenomenon of binocular luster can be evoked by simple dichoptic center-surround stimuli showing a luminance contrast difference between the eyes. Previous findings support the idea that this phenomenon is mediated by a low-level conflict mechanism that integrates the monocular signals from different types of contrast detector cells. Also, isoluminant stimuli with different chromatic contrasts between eyes can trigger sensations of luster. Here, we investigate whether the lustrous impression in such purely chromatic stimuli depends on interocular contrast differences and in particular on interocular contrast polarity pairings in a similar way as in the achromatic case. In our experiments, we measured the magnitude of the lustrous response using a series of isoluminant dichoptic center-ring-surround stimuli with varying ring width whose chromatic properties were varied along the red-green and blue-yellow cardinal directions. The trends in the data were very similar to those of our former study with achromatic stimuli, indicating similar mechanisms in both cases. The empirical luster data could also be predicted fairly well by a chromatic version of our interocular conflict model (with overall R2 values between 0.577 and 0.639), for which two different receptive field models were used, simulating the behavior of color-sensitive double-opponent cells in V1.
Collapse
|
2
|
Kingdom FAA, Mohammad-Ali K, Breuil C, Chang-Ou D, Irgaliyev A. Detection of vertical interocular phase disparities using luster as cue. J Vis 2023; 23:10. [PMID: 37335571 DOI: 10.1167/jov.23.6.10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Interocular disparities in contrast generate an impression of binocular luster, providing a cue for their detection. Disparities in the carrier spatial phase of horizontally oriented Gabor patches also generate an impression of luster, so the question arises as to whether it is the disparities in local contrast that accompany the phase disparities that give rise to the luster. We examined this idea by comparing the detection of interocular spatial phase disparities with that of interocular contrast disparities in Gabor patches, in the latter case that differed in overall contrast rather than phase between the eyes. When bandwidth was held constant and Gabor spatial frequency was varied, the detection of phase and contrast disparities followed a similar pattern. However, when spatial frequency was fixed and Gabor envelope standard deviation (and hence number of modulation cycles) was varied, thresholds for detecting phase disparities followed a U-shaped function of Gabor standard deviation, whereas thresholds for contrast disparities, following an initial decline, were more-or-less constant as a function of Gabor standard deviation. After reviewing a number of possible explanations for the U-shape found with phase disparities, we suggest that the likely cause is binocular sensory fusion, the strength of which increases with the number of modulation cycles. Binocular sensory fusion would operate to reduce phase but not contrast disparities, thus selectively elevating phase disparity thresholds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederick A A Kingdom
- McGill Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, Montreal General Hospital, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Camille Breuil
- McGill Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, Montreal General Hospital, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Deuscies Chang-Ou
- McGill Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, Montreal General Hospital, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Artur Irgaliyev
- McGill Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, Montreal General Hospital, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sakano Y, Ando H. Conditions of a Multi-View 3D Display for Accurate Reproduction of Perceived Glossiness. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VISUALIZATION AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS 2022; 28:3336-3350. [PMID: 33651695 DOI: 10.1109/tvcg.2021.3063182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Visualizing objects as they are perceived in the real world is often critical in our daily experiences. We previously focused on objects' surface glossiness visualized with a 3D display and found that a multi-view 3D display reproduces perceived glossiness more accurately than a 2D display. This improvement of glossiness reproduction can be explained by the fact that a glossy surface visualized by a multi-view 3D display appropriately provides luminance differences between the two eyes and luminance changes accompanying the viewer's lateral head motion. In the present study, to determine the requirements of a multi-view 3D display for the accurate reproduction of perceived glossiness, we developed a simulator of a multi-view 3D display to independently and simultaneously manipulate the viewpoint interval and the magnitude of the optical inter-view crosstalk. Using the simulator, we conducted a psychophysical experiment and found that glossiness reproduction is most accurate when the viewpoint interval is small and there is just a small (but not too small) amount of crosstalk. We proposed a simple yet perceptually valid model that quantitatively predicts the reproduction accuracy of perceived glossiness.
Collapse
|
4
|
Wendt G, Faul F. A simple model of binocular luster. J Vis 2022; 22:6. [PMID: 36074478 PMCID: PMC9469037 DOI: 10.1167/jov.22.10.6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The dichoptic combination of simple center–surround stimuli showing a contrast difference between eyes can trigger a lustrous impression in the fused percept, particularly when the contrast polarities in the two input images are of opposite sign. Recent developments suggest that the phenomenon of binocular luster results from a neural conflict between ON and OFF visual pathways at an early binocular level. Support for this idea was found in a previous study in which the empirical luster judgments strongly correlated with the predictions of an interocular conflict model which was based on such ON–OFF pairings. However, our original model could not account for the fact that weaker lustrous sensations can also be evoked by stimuli showing contrast polarities of same sign between eyes. In the present study we present an improved model that also includes ON–ON and OFF–OFF pairings. The predictive power of this model was tested in a series of four experiments, using a total of about 500 different center–ring–surround configurations as test stimuli. We found that, overall, our modified version accounts for more than 80% of the variance in the empirical luster judgments and that the former problems could be largely resolved. Our results further suggest a nonlinear transducer function for the binocular conflict signals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gunnar Wendt
- Institut für Psychologie, Universität Kiel, Kiel, Germany.,
| | - Franz Faul
- Institut für Psychologie, Universität Kiel, Kiel, Germany.,
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wendt G, Faul F. Binocular luster - A review. Vision Res 2022; 194:108008. [PMID: 35182893 DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2022.108008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Binocular luster is a visual phenomenon that can be elicited by dichoptic stimuli showing an interocular difference in color or luminance contrast. For instance, when the two eyes are presented with simple center-surround stimuli in which the center patch in one eye is brighter and in the other eye darker than the common surround, the center patch in the fused percept assumes a lustrous appearance reminiscent of metal or graphite. Soon after the discovery of this phenomenon in the mid-19th century, it was intensively studied and several explanations were proposed. After this initial phase, however, research interest waned significantly. Stimulated by new insights into related phenomena and the underlying physiological mechanisms, the last 20 years have seen an increase in research activity in this field, which has considerably expanded our understanding of binocular luster. In this paper, we provide a detailed review of research on binocular luster over the past 170 years. We present and discuss the existing findings in a number of separate sections, dealing with 1) the phenomenology of binocular luster, 2) different theories that have been proposed, 3) several factors influencing the lustrous impression, 4) the relationship between binocular luster and binocular rivalry, 5) the current understanding of its neural basis, and 6) potential applications based on binocular luster.
Collapse
|
6
|
Venkataramanan K, Gawde S, Hathibelagal AR, Bharadwaj SR. Binocular fusion enhances the efficiency of spot-the-difference gameplay. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0254715. [PMID: 34283852 PMCID: PMC8291752 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Spot-the-difference, the popular childhood game and a prototypical change blindness task, involves identification of differences in local features of two otherwise identical scenes using an eye scanning and matching strategy. Through binocular fusion of the companion scenes, the game becomes a visual search task, wherein players can simply scan the cyclopean percept for local features that may distinctly stand-out due to binocular rivalry/lustre. Here, we had a total of 100 visually normal adult (18-28 years of age) volunteers play this game in the traditional non-fusion mode and after cross-fusion of the companion images using a hand-held mirror stereoscope. The results demonstrate that the fusion mode significantly speeds up gameplay and reduces errors, relative to the non-fusion mode, for a range of target sizes, contrasts, and chromaticity tested (all, p<0.001). Amongst the three types of local feature differences available in these images (polarity difference, presence/absence of a local feature difference and shape difference in a local feature difference), features containing polarity difference was identified as first in ~60-70% of instances in both modes of gameplay (p<0.01), with this proportion being larger in the fusion than in the non-fusion mode. The binocular fusion advantage is lost when the lustre cue is purposefully weakened through alterations in target luminance polarity. The spot-the-difference game may thus be cheated using binocular fusion and the differences readily identified through a vivid experience of binocular rivalry/lustre.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kavitha Venkataramanan
- Brien Holden Institute of Optometry and Vision Sciences, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Swanandi Gawde
- Brien Holden Institute of Optometry and Vision Sciences, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Amithavikram R Hathibelagal
- Brien Holden Institute of Optometry and Vision Sciences, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
- Prof Brien Holden Eye Research Centre, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Shrikant R Bharadwaj
- Brien Holden Institute of Optometry and Vision Sciences, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
- Prof Brien Holden Eye Research Centre, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
The role of contrast polarities in binocular luster: Low-level and high-level processes. Vision Res 2020; 176:141-155. [PMID: 32890940 DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2020.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Revised: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
The binocular fusion of two center-surround configurations, where one center is brighter, the other darker than the common surround, leads to a strong impression of luster in the central patch. Without reversed contrast polarities of the center patches, this impression is much weaker or even absent. However, we observed that in the latter case the perceived luster can be considerably enhanced by enclosing both centers with a thin ring of fixed luminance. Compared to the standard stimulus, this center-ring-surround configuration shows much less binocular rivalry and the luster has also a different, more glass-like material quality. In a psychophysical experiment, we examined how the magnitude of the lustrous response depends on the width of the ring, both in stimuli with reversed and consistent contrast polarities. It has been proposed that binocular luster results from a neuronal conflict between ON and OFF visual pathways. To test this hypothesis with respect to our data, we developed a simple model to estimate the amount of interocular conflict resulting from a given binocular stimulus pair and applied it to all stimuli used in the experiment. We found strong correlations between the interocular conflict measure and the strength of luster observed in the experiment, suggesting that a common low-level mechanism determines the magnitude of the lustrous response. Regarding the differences in the perceived material quality of the lustrous impressions, we discuss evidence indicating that high-level processes are involved that promote the visual system's interpretation of the ring-stimuli as a certain depth-segmented 3D scene.
Collapse
|