Economics of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a systematic review

Neuroendocrine neoplasms: Consensus on a patient care pathway

People with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) face a multitude of challenges, including delayed diagnosis, low awareness of the cancer among healthcare professionals and limited access to multidisciplinary care and expert centres. We have developed the first patient care pathway for people living with NENs in England to guide disease management and help overcome these barriers. The pathway was developed in two phases. First, a pragmatic review of the literature was conducted, which was used to develop a draft patient care pathway. Second, the draft pathway was then updated following semi-structured interviews with carefully selected expert stakeholders. After each phase, the pathway was discussed among a multidisciplinary, expert advisory group (which comprised the authors and the Deputy Chief Operating Officer, West Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust), who reached a consensus on the ideal care pathway. This article presents the outputs of this research. The pathway identified key barriers to care and highlighted how these may be addressed, with many of the findings relevant to the rest of the UK and international audiences. NENs are increasing in incidence and prevalence in England, compounding pre-existing inequities in diagnosis and disease management. Effective integration of this pathway within NHS England will help achieve optimal, equitable care provision for all people with NENs, and should be feasible within the existing expert multidisciplinary teams across the country.

Computing the Cost of Care per Patient per Day for Patients With Metastatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

PURPOSE

Patients with well-differentiated, low-grade metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) usually have a long median survival and require complex, expensive care over many years at multidisciplinary centers. The cost burden for patients and institutions serves as a barrier to care. Understanding the drivers of these costs and whether intense monitoring adds value will help to optimize value-based care.

METHODS

We adapted the cost of care per patient per day (CCPD) validated methodology to measure cost while accounting for varying follow-up duration. We queried the Stanford NEN Database, which aggregates data from the electronic health record and other electronic sources, to study patients with metastatic NENs receiving regular care at Stanford. Current Procedural Terminology codes for services incurred during the monitoring period for each patient were mapped to the corresponding cost conversion factor and date in the Medicare fee schedule.

RESULTS

Two hundred two patients between 2010 and 2017 were studied with a mean CCPD of $119.11 in US dollars (USD); NEN-specific systemic therapy made up 55% of this cost. Somatostatin analogs were the costliest systemic therapy. Systemic therapy was the driver of cost differences among patients with various primary tumor types, stage of disease, tumor differentiation and grade, and functional hormone status. Patients in the most expensive CCPD group did not have a significant survival benefit (P = .66).

CONCLUSION

The CCPD methodology was effective in studying cancer care value in NENs. Systemic therapy, specifically somatostatin analogs, was the primary driver of cost, and intense monitoring and higher-cost care did not improve survival outcomes.

Systemic Therapy for Tumor Control in Metastatic Well-Differentiated Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE

To develop recommendations for systemic therapy for well-differentiated grade 1 (G1) to grade 3 (G3) metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs).

METHODS

ASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of relevant studies and develop recommendations for clinical practice.

RESULTS

Eight randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Somatostatin analogs (SSAs) are recommended as first-line systemic therapy for most patients with G1-grade 2 (G2) metastatic well-differentiated GI-NETs. Observation is an option for patients with low-volume or slow-growing disease without symptoms. After progression on SSAs, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is recommended as systematic therapy for patients with somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-positive tumors. Everolimus is an alternative second-line therapy, particularly in nonfunctioning NETs and patients with SSTR-negative tumors. SSAs are standard first-line therapy for SSTR-positive pancreatic (pan)NETs. Rarely, observation may be appropriate for asymptomatic patients until progression. Second-line systemic options for panNETs include PRRT (for SSTR-positive tumors), cytotoxic chemotherapy, everolimus, or sunitinib. For SSTR-negative tumors, first-line therapy options are chemotherapy, everolimus, or sunitinib. There are insufficient data to recommend particular sequencing of therapies. Patients with G1-G2 high-volume disease, relatively high Ki-67 index, and/or symptoms related to tumor growth may benefit from early cytotoxic chemotherapy. For G3 GEP-NETs, systemic options for G1-G2 may be considered, although cytotoxic chemotherapy is likely the most effective option for patients with tumor-related symptoms, and SSAs are relatively ineffective. Qualifying statements are provided to assist with treatment choice. Multidisciplinary team management is recommended, along with shared decision making with patients, incorporating their values and preferences, potential benefits and harms, and other characteristics and circumstances, such as comorbidities, performance status, geographic location, and access to care.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines.

Health care resource use and costs among patients with carcinoid syndrome in France: Analysis of the National Health Insurance Database

OBJECTIVES

Carcinoid syndrome (CS) develops in approximately 20% of patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NET). This study described healthcare resource utilization and its associated costs among patients with NET and CS, using the French national health care data system.

METHODS

Patients were included if they had a hospital stay associated with the code E34.0 "CS" and at least one delivery of a somatostatin analogue (SSA) between 01/01/2012 and 31/12/2016. The end of the analysis was either 31/12/2017 or the date of death, whichever occurred first. Mean overall costs were described by item of expenditure and by periods.

RESULTS

646 patients were included: 64yo, 55% men, 64% and 15% had NET from the small-intestine or lung, respectively. Among them, 309 patients were incident and 271 died during the study period. Mean overall cost per person per month (PPPM) was €2,892: €3,273 for the first year following diagnosis, €2,574 in "middle-years" and €5,039 within the year preceding death. The two most costly expenditure items were drugs (€1,695 PPPM) and hospital stays (€870 PPPM).

CONCLUSION

The first year following diagnosis and the year preceding death are the two periods representing the highest costs for CS care in France. Successful disease management may contribute to lower costs in the intermediate period.

Healthcare cost by primary tumour, functioning status and treatment among patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours: The LyREMeNET study

The annual prevalence of metastatic neuroendocrine tumours (mNETs) is rising, leading to significant healthcare costs. The present study aimed to describe healthcare resource use (HRU) and the corresponding costs among patients with mNETs, according to primary tumour location, functioning status and type of treatments. The LyREMeNET study included consecutive mNET patients with a diagnosis performed between January 2010 and December 2017, who were seen at least once in the ENETS center of excellence in Lyon. The median HRU and costs per patient were estimated, up to 3 years before and after the diagnosis. The Cancer database of the center was linked to the French national health data system. HRU and related costs were described per person per month (PPPM). Among 316 patients presenting with a mNET, 48.4% had a small-intestinal mNET, 32.3% had a pancreatic mNET and 39.2% had carcinoid syndrome. The mean overall cost increased from €615 to €2875 PPPM between the years preceding and following the diagnosis, and remained above €2500 in the two subsequent years. The two main cost drivers of total healthcare expenditure were drugs (€1161) and hospital stay (€662). Median costs of mNETs arising from pancreas and small intestine were €2325 and €2540 PPPM, respectively. Costs were higher in patients with a functional mNET (€2807 PPPM for carcinoid syndrome) and during peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) (€8835 PPPM). The highest overall cost was found during the first year following the diagnosis. Cost of care was higher for small intestine mNETs, for functional mNETs and during peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.

Evaluating cost-effectiveness in the management of neuroendocrine neoplasms

The rapid evolution of novel, costly therapies for neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN) warrants formal high-quality cost-effectiveness evaluation. Costs of individual investigations and therapies are high; and examples are presented. We aimed to review the last ten years of standalone health economic evaluations in NEN. Comparing to published standards, EMBASE, Cochrane library, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), NHS Economic Evaluation Database and the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Database were searched for health economic evaluations (HEEs) in NEN published between 2010 and October 2019. Of 12 economic evaluations, 11 considered exclusively pharmacological treatment (3 studies of SSAs, 7 studies of sunitinib, everolimus and/or 177Lu-DOTATATE and 1 study of telotristat ethyl) and 1 compared surgery with intraarterial therapy. 7 studies of pharmacological treatment had placebo or best supportive care as the only comparator. There remains a paucity of economic evaluations in NEN with the majority industry funded. Most HEEs reviewed did not meet published health economic criteria used to assess quality. Lack of cost data collected from patient populations remains a significant factor in HEEs where clinical expert opinion is still often substituted. Further research utilizing high-quality effectiveness data and rigorous applied health economic analysis is needed.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of 68Ga DOTA-TATE PET/CT, 111In-Pentetreotide SPECT/CT and CT for Diagnostic Workup of Neuroendocrine Tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are relatively rare neoplasms arising from the hormone-producing neuroendocrine system that can occur in various organs such as pancreas, small bowel, stomach and lung. As the majority of these tumors express somatostatin receptors (SSR) on their cell membrane, utilization of SSR analogs in nuclear medicine is a promising, but relatively costly approach for detection and localization. The aim of this study was to analyze the cost-effectiveness of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT (Gallium-68 DOTA-TATE Positron emission tomography/computed tomography) compared to ¹¹¹In-pentetreotide SPECT/CT (Indium-111 pentetreotide Single Photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography) and to CT (computed tomography) alone in detection of NETs. A decision model on the basis of Markov simulations evaluated lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) related to either a CT, SPECT/CT or PET/CT. Model input parameters were obtained from publicized research projects. The analysis is grounded on the US healthcare system. Deterministic sensitivity analysis of diagnostic parameters and probabilistic sensitivity analysis predicated on a Monte Carlo simulation with 30,000 reiterations was executed. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) was determined to be $ 100,000/QALY. In the base-case investigation, PET/CT ended up with total costs of $88,003.07 with an efficacy of 4.179, whereas CT ended up with total costs of $88,894.71 with an efficacy of 4.165. SPECT/CT ended up with total costs of $89,973.34 with an efficacy of 4.158. Therefore, the strategies CT and SPECT/CT were dominated by PET/CT in the base-case scenario. In the sensitivity analyses, PET/CT remained a cost-effective strategy. This result was due to reduced therapy costs of timely detection. The additional costs of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT when compared to CT alone are justified in the light of potential savings in therapy costs and better outcomes.

A literature-based treatment algorithm for low-grade neuroendocrine liver metastases

BACKGROUND

The optimal timing of treatment of liver metastases from low-grade neuroendocrine tumors (LG-NELM) varies significantly due to numerous treatment modalities and the literature supporting various treatment(s). This study sought to create and validate a literature-based treatment algorithm for LG-NELM.

METHODS

A treatment algorithm to maximize overall survival (OS) was designed using peer-reviewed articles evaluating treatment of LG-NELM. This algorithm was retrospectively applied to patients treated for LG-NELM at our institution. Deviation was determined based on whether or not a patient received treatment consistent with that recommended by the algorithm. Patients who did and did not deviate from the algorithm were compared with respect to OS and number of treatments.

RESULTS

Applying our algorithm to a 149-patient cohort, 57 (38%) deviated from recommended treatment. Deviation occurred in the form of alternative (28, 49%) versus additional procedures (29, 51%). Algorithm deviators underwent significantly more procedures than non-deviators (median 1 vs. 2, p < 0.001). Cox model indicated no difference in OS associated with algorithm deviation (HR 1.19, p = 0.58) when controlling for age and tumor characteristics.

CONCLUSION

This literature-based algorithm helps standardize treatment protocols in patients with LG-NELM and can reduce cost and risk by minimizing unnecessary procedures. Prospective implementation and validation is required.

An Update on Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: From Mysteries to Paradigm Shifts

Although neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) were once thought to be rare and mostly "benign" diseases, they are now being redefined in light of recently discovered molecular information. NENs constitute a spectrum of variably differentiated neoplasms, ranging from well-differentiated tumors with a protracted course over many years to very aggressive neuroendocrine carcinomas. Although the majority of NEN are non-functional lesions, some of these tumors, do produce a hormonal hypersecretion syndrome. Their reappraisal has led scientist to unveil previously unknown oncogenic pathways and connections that resulted in a new category in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) and a revised version of the World Health Organization Classification (WHO 2018). Complex diseases like NEN require a multidisciplinary approach that includes the perspectives of endocrinologists, medical and surgical oncologists, radiation oncologists, imaging specialists and pathologists. There are currently virtually thousands of ongoing trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of several molecular targeted therapies. The purpose of this review was to critically evaluate recent information regarding the pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of NEN.