Adverse drug reactions due to cancer chemotherapy in a tertiary care teaching hospital

Drug-related problems among esophageal, gastric and colorectal cancer patients at the National and referral hospital in Kenya

INTRODUCTION

Cancer therapy has remarkable potential for drug-related problems due to the high cytotoxicity and narrow therapeutic index of most anti-neoplastic regimens. However, there is a lack of comprehensive studies on drug-related problems in patients with gastrointestinal cancer in Kenya. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the prevalence, types and predictors of drug-related problems among gastrointestinal cancer patients at Kenyatta National Hospital.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was used to assess the prevalence of drug-related problems among a random sample of 160 esophageal, 103 gastric, and 96 colorectal cancer patients. Data were collected using a researcher-administered questionnaire and data abstraction tool after training the data collectors. Patient-specific details such as socio-demographic features, histological cancer types, cancer stage, comorbidity types, and treatment regimen were recorded after the review of medical records and patient interviews. The potential of drug-related problems was determined as per the standard guidelines. The data were entered and analysed using version 26.0 SPSS statistical software.

RESULTS

Most esophageal (51.9%), gastric (59.2%), and colorectal (62.5%) cancer patients had a high prevalence of drug-related problems. The need for additional drug therapy and adverse drug reactions were the predominant categories of drug-related problems. Most adverse drug reactions identified had possible categories of causality score, mild severity levels, and definitely preventable types of adverse drug reactions among all gastrointestinal cancer patients. Comorbidity and advanced-stage disease were significant predictors of drug-related problems.

CONCLUSIONS

Drug-related problems were prevalent among gastrointestinal cancer patients in our setting. Comorbidity and advanced stages of disease were significant predictors of drug-related problems.

Current Scenario and Future Prospects of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) Monitoring and Reporting Mechanisms in the Rural Areas of India

BACKGROUND

Pharmacovigilance (PV) deals with the detection, collection, assessment, understanding, and prevention of adverse effects associated with drugs. The objective of PV is to ensure the safety of the medicines and patients by monitoring and reporting all adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with prescribed medicine usage. Findings have indicated that about 0.2- 24% of hospitalization cases are due to ADRs, of which 3.7% of patients have lethal ADRs. The reasons include the number of prescribed drugs, an increased number of new medicines in the market, an inadequate PV system for ADR monitoring, and a need for more awareness and knowledge about ADR reporting. Severe ADRs lead to enhanced hospital stays, increased treatment costs, risk of death, and many medical and economic consequences. Therefore, ADR reporting at its first instance is essential to avoid further harmful effects of the prescribed drugs. In India, the rate of ADR reporting is less than 1%, whereas worldwide, it is 5% due to a need for more awareness about PV and ADR monitoring among healthcare providers and patients. The main objective of this review is to highlight the current scenario and possible futuristic ways of ADR reporting methods in rural areas of India. We have searched the literature using PubMed, Google scholar, Indian citation index to retrieve the resources related to ADR monitoring and reporting in India's urban and rural areas. Spontaneous reporting is the most commonly used PV method to report ADRs in India's urban and rural areas. Evidence revealed that no effective ADR reporting mechanisms developed in rural areas causing underreporting of ADR, thus increasing the threat to the rural population. Hence, PV and ADR reporting awareness among healthcare professionals and patients, telecommunication, telemedicine, use of social media and electronic medical records, and artificial intelligence are the potential approaches for prevention, monitoring, and reporting of ADRs in rural areas.

Antitumoral Agent-Induced Constipation: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Constipation is a common symptom in patients receiving antitumoral treatment. The mechanisms underlying antitumoral agent-induced constipation (ATAIC) are poorly defined. This systematic review aimed to analyze and synthesize the available information related to the prevalence, etiology, and treatment of ATAIC.

METHODS

A systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted. The review included human studies written in English, French, or Spanish involving patients with cancer and containing information about the prevalence, etiology, and treatment of ATAIC.

RESULTS

A total of 73 articles were included. The reported prevalence ranged from 0.8% to 86.6%. Six studies reported an ATAIC prevalence of over 50%. The prevalence rates of constipation of grades 3 and 4 ranged between 0 and 11%. The importance of enteric neuronal integrity in gastrointestinal function was reported. The articles with the highest levels of evidence in relation to ATAIC treatment obtained in this systematic review studied treatments with acupuncture, sweet potato, osteopath, probiotics, and moxibustion.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of constipation in patients undergoing antitumoral treatment is very diverse. Studies specifically designed to report the prevalence of antineoplastic treatment-induced constipation are needed. The importance of enteric neuronal integrity in gastrointestinal function was described. Thus, neuroprotection could be an area of research for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced gastrointestinal disorders.

Implementation of pharmaceutical care service to elderly cancer patients in a tertiary care hospital in South India

PURPOSE

The goal of this study is to identify drug-related problems (DRPs) for elderly cancer patients receiving chemotherapy by implementing pharmaceutical care services.

METHODS

In this interventional study, patients were followed after each cycle till 12 weeks. The MOATT-MASCC teaching tool was used to educate patients about their therapy. The outcome measures included the occurrences of any DRPs such as inappropriate medication dose, dosage form, route of administration, therapeutic duplication, failure of the patient to adhere to the medication regimen, adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and to resolve it.

RESULTS

On 186 patients, there were 38% ADRs, 16% DDIs, 6% non-adherence to therapy, 4% medical conditions for which no medication was prescribed, and 1% therapeutic duplication and transcribing error was identified. A total of 226 ADRs were documented. Nausea and vomiting were the most frequently occurring ADRs (24%) and platinum compounds caused the highest number of ADRs. Assessments of causality showed that the majority of cases are 'probable' (50%). In evaluating the severity of ADRs, 53% of ADRs were 'moderate' and 51% of ADRs were 'probably' preventable. Upon assessing the DDIs, 35% of the prescriptions had 'monitor therapy'. All of the DRPs, that were identified were notified to the treating oncologists and resolved without any disagreement.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmaceutical care is essential for elderly cancer patients. Oncologists and pharmacists should work together to identify and manage DRPs as well as educate patients about their disease. This will help in improved patient care and a better therapeutic outcome.

Realm of proteomics in breast cancer management and drug repurposing to alleviate intricacies of treatment

Breast cancer, a multi-networking heterogeneous disease, has emerged as a serious impediment to progress in clinical oncology. Although technological advancements and emerging cancer research studies have mitigated breast cancer lethality, a precision cancer-oriented solution has not been achieved. Thus, this review will persuade the acquiescence of proteomics-based diagnostic and therapeutic options in breast cancer management. Recently, the evidence of breast cancer health surveillance through imaging proteomics, single-cell proteomics, interactomics, and post-translational modification (PTM) tracking, to construct proteome maps and proteotyping for stage-specific and sample-specific cancer subtyping have outperformed conventional ways of dealing with breast cancer by increasing diagnostic efficiency, prognostic value, and predictive response. Additionally, the paradigm shift in applied proteomics for designing a chemotherapy regimen to identify novel drug targets with minor adverse effects has been elaborated. Finally, the potential of proteomics in alleviating the occurrence of chemoresistance and enhancing reprofiled drugs' effectiveness to combat therapeutic obstacles has been discussed. Owing to the enormous potential of proteomics techniques, the clinical recognition of proteomics in breast cancer management can be achievable and therapeutic intricacies can be surmountable.

Development of evidence-based indicators for the detection of drug-related problems among ovarian cancer patients

Background: Antineoplastic drugs produce serious drug-related problems and their management is challenging. DRPs are critical, for saving on therapeutic costs, particularly in resource poor settings within low-middle-income countries such as India. Indicators are clues that helps to detect DRPs within the healthcare organization and minimize overall harm from medications. Indicators enable healthcare professionals to determine the future therapeutic course. And enable healthcare professionals to take a proactive stand, and stay informed and empowered to both prevent and manage DRPs. This study aims to develop evidence-based indicators for detecting potential drug-related problems in ovarian cancer patients. Patients and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in the Department of Oncology of a tertiary care teaching hospital in South India. Based on literature search, we developed a list of indicators, which were validated by a Delphi panel of multidisciplinary healthcare professionals (16 members). Based on 2 years of ovarian cancer data, we performed a feasibility test retrospectively and classified the DRPs according to the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe classification of DRPs version-9.1. Results: The feasibility test identified 130 out of 200 indicators. A total of 803 pDRPs were identified under four main categories: drug selection problem, drug use problem, adverse drug reaction and drug-drug interaction The most frequently observed were ADR 381 (47.45%), DDIs 354 (44.08%), and drug selection problems 62 (7.72%). Conclusion: Indicators developed by us effectively identified pDRPs in ovarian cancer patients, which can potentially help healthcare professionals in the early detection, timely management, and attenuating severity of DRPs. Identifying the pDDIs can potentially improve interdisciplinary involvement and task sharing, including enhanced pharmacists' participation within the healthcare team.

Quality of life and wellbeing among breast cancer patients in Lahore, Pakistan

Background

Breast cancer has a high incidence rate, emphasizing the necessity of enhanced information on health-related quality of life (HrQOL) in this population of patients. The aim of this study was to identify the factors influencing the QOL experienced by patients in Pakistan.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted on women with breast cancer, and four instruments were used on a random sample of 130 Pakistani women: FACIT-B Version 4 questionnaire,WHO causality assessment scale, Naranjo's algorithm, and a demographic/clinical characteristics section. Data analysis included descriptive analysis, independent sample t-test, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) test.

Results

The patients' mean age was 49.10 (standard deviation (SD) 10.89); 98.5% were married. The mean score was 18.34 for physical wellbeing (SD 5.92; interquartile range (IQR) 11), 16.33 for social/family wellbeing (SD 6.3; IQR 11.25), 13.6 for emotional wellbeing (SD 3.55; IQR 6), 17.13 for functional wellbeing (SD 3.73; IQR 6), and 24.86 for breast cancer subscale (SD 3.64; IQR 4). The study found that the age, entitlement, recurrence, marital status, salary, number of doses, duration of cancer treatment, and chemotherapy sessions were significantly related to QOL terms in the assessment of the FACIT-B scale. The WHO causality evaluation scale determined that 78.1% of the responses were "probable" and 20.1% were "possible". According to Naranjo's algorithm assessment scale, 80% of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were "probable", whereas 18.4% were declared "possible". Chemotherapy-induced anemia was the most often reported ADR in 64.6% of patients, followed by chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (61.5%).

Conclusion

Healthcare practitioners must acknowledge and take into account the significance of QOL in addition to therapy for breast cancer patients in order to enhance their health. The findings of this study will aid in filling gaps in current unknown knowledge and identifying sites where patients require additional assistance. Because cancer and chemotherapy clearly have a negative impact on individuals' QOL, oncologists must concentrate on strategies that help cancer patients during their sickness and treatment while also enhancing self-care and QOL. Those with cancer will benefit from emotional wellbeing and adaptation to their disease.

Development and validation of a comprehensive needs assessment tool to assess the burden of cancer chemotherapy patients attending a tertiary care hospital

INTRODUCTION

In India in 2020, there were an estimated 1.39 million cancers present in the country. Chemotherapy patients experience several problems such as ADRs (adverse drug reactions), and because of this, many dropouts have been happening. Also, there is a lack of communication between the patient and care providers (doctors).

OBJECTIVES

Development and validation of a comprehensive needs assessment tool to assess the burden of chemotherapy on patients attending tertiary level health care facilities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Development and validation of comprehensive needs assessment in cancer chemotherapy involve several steps, including problem statement and literature review regarding the problem, domain generation, development of the preliminary questionnaire, face validation, statistical validation, and final draft of the tool.

RESULTS

A total of 10 experts are involved in face validation. The majority (80%) of the experts agreed with the grammar, clarity, and content of the tool. A few experts (20%) disagreed regarding the construction of the questionnaire, the appropriate level of understanding for the participants, and the content of the tool and suggested changes in the physical and psychological domains. The questionnaire has been re-structured according to the expert's suggestion before going for statistical validation. Internal consistency of the CNAT-CC was optimal, with a satisfactory Cronbach's alpha of 0.7 for the total scale.

DISCUSSION

The current study was focused on the development and validation of needs assessment in cancer chemotherapy patients. The CNAT-CC promises to be a comprehensive needs assessment tool that applies to a comparatively vast majority of patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy.

An Account of Acute Adverse Drug Reactions Occurring in a Day-Care Chemotherapy Unit of a Tertiary Care Cancer Hospital—A Prospective Observational Study

Introduction Acute adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in day-care chemotherapy are not uncommon and are easily manageable on most occasions. However, sometimes they may lead to untoward events. It is paramount to document and analyze such events in contemporary medical oncology practice for the best utilization and planning of available personnel and resources.

Objective Our objective was to analyze the acute ADRs occurring in day-care cancer chemotherapy settings.

Materials and Methods ADRs reported in a day-care cancer chemotherapy setting, during the administration of chemotherapy, were prospectively observed and analyzed from 01 June 2020 to 31 December 2020. ADRs were classified into anaphylactic, allergic, and gastrointestinal (GI) (nausea/vomiting/heart burns/chest tightness). All ADRs were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 5.0. Suspected drugs, time to reaction, and corrective measures were analyzed.

Results During the study period, a total of 10,120 sessions of day-care chemotherapy were administered. ADRs were noticed in 118 cases (1.18%). Among the reported ADRs, the mean and median age of the patients in this study was 52 years (21–88). Women outnumbered men (n = 81, 68.64% vs n = 37, 31.36%). Anaphylactic reactions (50.92%) were the most common followed by allergic (25.15%) and GI reactions (23.93%). No grade IV reaction was observed. Oxaliplatin-induced allergic reactions (n = 28, 23.73%) were noted most frequently. In majority of sessions (n = 93, 78.81%), the same chemotherapy regimen was readministered and completed uneventfully after the administration of antihypersensitivity medications.

Conclusion Serious ADRs are rare in current day-care chemotherapy administration. Most acute ADRs were of mild grade and successfully managed with antihypersensitivity medication.

Evaluation of Factors Associated with Adverse Drug Events in South Korea Using a Population-Based Database

This retrospective study aims to investigate the factors associated with the occurrence of ADEs using nationally representative claims data. All patients with at least one claim with diagnosis codes denoting potential ADE between 1 July 2015 and 31 December 2015 were included. Potential ADE was defined as ADE identified in the claims data, because it was not verified. The index date was defined as the date of the first claim with potential ADEs. Demographic data were collected at the index date, while data on comorbidities and number of medications used were collected six months before the index date. Multivariate logistic regression was used to explore the association between potential ADEs and several factors, including sex, age group, insurance type, comorbidities, and number of prescribed medications. Patients with potential ADEs were older, had more chronic diseases, and used more medications than those without potential ADEs. In the multivariate analysis, occurrence of potential ADEs was associated with age (≥65 years, odds ratio [OR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08–1.21), Medical Aid program (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.27–1.47), Charlson Comorbidity Index scores (≥5, OR 2.87, 95% CI 2.56–3.20), and use of six or more medications (6–10 medications, OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.79–1.99). Age, Medical Aid program, comorbidities, and number of medications were associated with occurrence of potential ADEs.

Inspiratory muscle training in addition to conventional physical rehabilitation in hospitalized patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) in addition to conventional physical rehabilitation on muscle strength, functional capacity, mobility, hemodynamics, fatigue, and quality of life in hospitalized patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

METHODS

We conducted a randomized controlled trial in 57 inpatients with hematological diseases undergoing HSCT. Conventional inpatient physical rehabilitation was delivered to the IMT (n = 27) and control (CON; n = 30) groups according to usual care, and the first group additionally performed IMT. The IMT was prescribed according to clinical and laboratory parameters at 40% of maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), 5 days/week throughout the hospitalization, in sessions of 10-20 min. The primary outcome was MIP and the secondary outcomes were maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), peripheral muscle strength (handgrip and sit-to-stand tests), functional capacity (6-min step test), mobility (timed up and go test), blood pressure, quality of life (EORTC-QLQ-C30), and fatigue (FACT-F) at admission and hospital discharge.

RESULTS

The population was predominately autologous HSCT. The IMT group significantly increased the MIP (P < 0.01) and decreased both fatigue (P = 0.01) and blood pressure (P < 0.01) compared with control. No differences were found between admission and hospital discharge in peripheral and expiratory muscle strength, functional capacity, mobility, and quality of life in both groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the effectiveness of IMT as part of rehabilitation for HSCT inpatients, improving inspiratory muscle strength, and reducing fatigue and blood pressure.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03373526 (clinicaltrials.gov).

Exposure to Antineoplastic Drugs in Occupational Settings: A Systematic Review of Biological Monitoring Data

The high toxicity of antineoplastic drugs (ADs) makes them dangerous not only for patients, but also for exposed workers. Therefore, the aim of this review was to provide an updated overview of the biological monitoring of occupational AD exposure in order to extrapolate information useful to improve risk assessment and management strategies in workplaces. Several studies demonstrated that remarkable portions of healthcare workers may have traces of these substances or their metabolites in biological fluids, although with some conflicting results. Nurses, directly engaged in AD handling, were the occupational category at higher risk of contamination, although, in some cases, personnel not involved in AD-related tasks also showed quantifiable internal doses. Overall, further research carried out on greater sample sizes appears necessary to gain deeper insight into the variability retrieved in the reported results. This may be important to understand the impact of the extent of ADs use, different handling, procedures, and cleaning practices, spill occurrence, training of the workforce, as well as the adoption of adequate collective and personal protective equipment in affecting the occupational exposure levels. This may support the achievement of the greatest clinical efficiency of such therapies while assuring the health and safety of involved workers.

Retrospective Observational Study to Evaluate Causality, Preventability and Severity of Adverse Drug Reaction Associated with Anticancer Drugs in A Tertiary Care Hospital in Northern India

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy has high efficacy, but it is associated with several adverse drug reactions (ADRs).

OBJECTIVES

A retrospective observational study to explore the prevalence, causality, and preventability of ADRs of anticancer agents was conducted.

METHODS

The study was carried out at Punjab Institute of Medical Sciences Jalandhar, Punjab after obtaining IEC approval. The data was collected from cancer patients undergoing treatment at the hospital. The causality assessment of the collected data was done by using WHO causality assessment criteria. The preventability and severity of the reported ADRs were also assessed.

RESULTS

From 50 medical records, a total of 47 ADRs were recorded among 25 patients out of which 16 were females and the rest were males. The cancer cases observed were breast carcinoma, leukaemia, lung, colon, and ovarian cancer. The highest number of ADRs were observed with alkylating agents, followed by taxanes, antimetabolites, kinase inhibitors, and monoclonal antibodies. The most affected organ systems were the gastrointestinal system, blood, and lymphatic system. According to the causality assessment, the majority of the ADRs were of the "possible" category. Preventability analysis showed that 85.11% of ADRs were unavoidable reactions, while 14.89% of ADRs were possibly avoidable. Severity analysis of ADRs showed that 87.23% of ADRs were mild and 12.77% were of moderate severity. The majority of the ADRs were unavoidable and mild to moderate in severity.

CONCLUSION

Since the majority of the ADRs were of the unavoidable category, indicate that the treatment regimens are acceptable as per the current clinical management of cancer patients.

Adverse Drug Reaction Profile of Anticancer Agents in a Tertiary Care Hospital: An Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Anti-cancer agents are known to be toxic, leading to a number of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). ADRs not only increase the financial burden on patient/healthcare system but also decrease quality of life. Understanding the burden of ADR will help strengthen the knowledge on patient safety and thereby in implementing intervention strategies to reduce it.

OBJECTIVES

1. To study the pattern of Adverse drug reaction of anticancer agents of patients admitted in the oncology ward. 2. To assess the causality, severity, and preventability of the adverse drug reactions observed.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional, observational study carried out in 200 adult patients in the daycare center for chemotherapy. Details of ADRs noted in the previous and current cycles were noted. Causality assessment was done using Naranjo and WHO scale. For severity and preventability assessment Hartwig Siegel and Modified Schumock Thorton scale were used respectively.

RESULTS

Out of the total 732 ADRs encountered, alopecia was the most common ADR. The average number of ADRs observed per patient was 3.66 + 1.59(mean + SD). The maximum number of ADRs were seen in Paclitaxel-carboplatin 3 weekly regimen. Nausea and alopecia were the most common ADRs reported with most regimens. On causality assessment, 95(12.97%) were definitely related according to Naranjo's Causality scale, while 15.71% were certainly related according to WHO scale. Of all the ADRs recorded,47.81% were of moderate-intensity while 52.18% were of mild intensity. The majority of ADRs were not preventable, 87.59%.

CONCLUSION

Alopecia was the most common ADR reported. Most of the ADRs could be causally related to drugs. These ADRs were mild to moderate in severity and were not preventable. There is need to identify the underlying factors that predispose patients to these ADRs and target them in future research.

Clinical application of comfort nursing in elderly patients with advanced lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

To explore the clinical effect of comfort nursing in elderly patients with advanced lung cancer (ALC).

METHODS

Eighty-six elderly patients with ALC treated in our hospital were selected as clinical subjects for this prospective study. The patients were randomly divided into the control group (n=43, received routine nursing) and the observation group (n=43, received additional comfort nursing based on routine nursing) according to a digital table method. The scores of pressure ulcer scale (Braden), Morse fall scale (MFS), numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain, activity of daily living (ADL) scale, incidence of complications and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The scores of Braden and ADL scale of the two groups were significantly improved (all P<0.05) under different nursing methods. The improvement of patients in the observation group was better than that in the control group after nursing, and the difference was statistically significant (all P<0.01). Compared with those before nursing, the scores of MFS and NRS in the two groups were decreased, and the improvements in the observation group were more obvious (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the control group (83.72%) was significantly higher (P<0.05) than that in the observation group (65.12%). The nursing satisfaction of patients in the control group (76.74%) was significant lower (P<0.05) than that in the observation group (93.02%).

CONCLUSION

Comfort nursing has a positive clinical effect in elderly patients with ALC. It can improve the patients' quality of life and reduce the incidence of pain and complications, which has high patient satisfaction and obvious clinical effects.

Pattern, severity, and outcome of adverse drug reactions in a tertiary care hospital: an evidence from a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

Study aim to describe the spontaneous reporting of the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) among the patients admitted to medicine department of a tertiary care hospital.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was conducted over a period of four months at the medicine department. On the daily basis, all the patients aged >18 years admitted to the internal medicine department were followed and analyzed for occurrence of ADRs. Naranjo scale was used to determine causal relationship between the ADRs and suspected drugs. The nature of ADRs and its severity was assessed using the Hartwig scale.

RESULTS

A total of 4,530 patients were screened for the ADRs, out of which 90 ADRs were developed in the 89 patients. The overall incidence of ADRs was found to be 1.96% in the studied population. The most common ADRs encountered during the study period were type A (augmented). The least number of ADRs were observed in the age group of 31-40 years. Furthermore, the more significant number of male patients suffered from a severe type of ADRs as compared to females. Sixteen ADRs were of the mucocutaneous type of reaction followed by dizziness in 12 cases. The higher number of patients recovering from the ADRs was in the age group 41-60 years. The outcomes of ADRs were not found to be statistically significant with gender and age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a strong need to extend the monitoring and reporting of the ADRs to ensure the patient safety. However, the overall incidence of ADRs appeared to be less in our study, highlighting the need for strengthening reporting system of ADRs. The results indicate that elderly patients are at significant risk of developing ADRs.

Chemical risk in hospital settings: Overview on monitoring strategies and international regulatory aspects

Chemical risk in hospital settings is a growing concern that health professionals and supervisory authorities must deal with daily. Exposure to chemical risk is quite different depending on the hospital department involved and might origin from multiple sources, such as the use of sterilizing agents, disinfectants, detergents, solvents, heavy metals, dangerous drugs, and anesthetic gases. Improving prevention procedures and constantly monitoring the presence and level of potentially toxic substances, both in workers (biological monitoring) and in working environments (environmental monitoring), might significantly reduce the risk of exposure and contaminations. The purpose of this article is to present an overview on this subject, which includes the current international regulations, the chemical pollutants to which medical and paramedical personnel are mainly exposed, and the strategies developed to improve safety conditions for all healthcare workers.

Drug therapy problems and health related quality of life among patients with colorectal cancer in a Kenyan tertiary health facility

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer is the third most common form of cancer in males and the second in females globally. The ill-health due to cancer and use of multiple therapies may result in drug related problems and also affect the health-related quality of life of the patients.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize drug therapy problems and health-related quality of life among patients with colorectal cancer at Kenyatta National Hospital.Methodology: A descriptive prospective cross-sectional study design was used and simple random sampling utilized to select seventy- one participants. The participants were interviewed and their responses captured using World Health Organisation Quality of Life-BREF and a structured questionnaire. The data were analysed using STATA version 15.0. Data was summarized using descriptive statistic such as mean, range and standard deviation. Association between variables was determined using linear regression model at 0.05% level of significance. Ethical approval was granted by the relevant authorities to conduct the study.

RESULTS

Patients were predominantly females (52.1%), had a mean age of 55.9± 14.4 years. The main drug therapy problems were adverse drug reactions (45.1%). Approximately two thirds (67.6%) of the participants complained of gastrointestinal problems followed by cardiovascular diseases (29.6%). Quality of life assessment indicated that psychological health had the highest score at 60.5%. On linear regression analysis, the presence of anemia (p = 0.021), coverage (p = 0.038), and cardiovascular problems (p = 0.034) were significantly associated with the overall health-related quality of life.

CONCLUSION

The health-related quality of life was is dependent on several patient related factors. Interventions regarding prevention of drug therapy problems should be considered alongside other measures used to manage colorectal cancer.

Chemotherapy-Related Adverse Drug Reaction and Associated Factors Among Hospitalized Paediatric Cancer Patients at Hospitals in North-West Ethiopia

BACKGROUND

One of the prevalent treatment modalities for cancer is chemotherapy. Adverse drug reactions, however, are becoming the world's major public health problem. More than half (54.5 percent) of cancer patients need hospitalization for further management, in addition to the increased health-care costs of treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate adverse drug reactions associated with chemotherapy and related factors in hospitalized paediatric cancer patients in Ethiopia's north-west hospitals.

METHODS

From July 1, 2017, to August 13, 2019, a cross-sectional study was carried out among 311 paediatric cancer patients at Gondar Comprehensive University, Specialized Hospital and Felegehiwot referral hospital. The data were entered into Epi Info version 7 and exported for further analysis to Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS). To identify associated variables, both the bi-variate and multi-variate logistic regression analyses were computed. Variables with a P-value of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant in the multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The overall adverse drug reaction in this study was 41.5 percent ((95% CI: 35.8-47.2%)). Patients who received concomitant medications were at higher risk of experiencing adverse drug reactions (AOR: 2.60 (95% CI: 1.54-4.40)), according to the multivariate logistic regression analysis. Similarly, there was a risk of developing adverse drug reactions in patients taking four or more chemotherapy agents (AOR: 2.67 (95% CI: 1.52-4.68)). In addition, regimens based on etoposide (AOR: 1.99 (95% CI: 0.93-4.27)), mercaptopurine (AOR: 3.91 (95% CI: 1.06-14.46)) and doxorubicin (AOR: 2.32 (95% CI: 1.30-4.15)) were at higher risk for adverse drug reactions in patients.

CONCLUSION

Adverse drug reactions developed in a significant proportion of the study patients (2 out of 5 patients). Therefore, for pediatric cancer patients on concomitant medications and for patients on etoposide, mercaptopurine and doxorubicin drug regimens, efficient prevention and management of adverse drug reactions should be sought.

Frequency, nature, severity and preventability of adverse drug reactions arising from cancer chemotherapy in a teaching hospital

Background:

An adverse drug reaction (ADR) is defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as “Any response to a drug which is noxious, unintended and occurs at doses used in man for prophylaxis, diagnosis or therapy”. Cancer chemotherapy is associated with the occurrence of ADRs, which is a worldwide problem. Monitoring and reporting of these ADRs are essential to safeguard the patient and to manage it accordingly. The outcome would create alertness and prevent their recurrence. Hence, we have undertaken a hospital-based study to study the frequency and nature of ADRs due to chemotherapeutic agents.

Methods:

A total of 500 patients developed ADRs due to cancer chemotherapy from 13^th April 2018 to 18^th September 2019. Demographics of the patient, drugs taken, and ADRs encountered were recorded in a predesigned form.

Results:

A total of 665 ADRs were recorded from 500 patients. Anemia was the most common ADR encountered followed by nausea/vomiting and leucopenia. Leukemia (s) were common cancer observed followed by lung and breast cancers. The most common drugs implicated were cisplatin, paclitaxel, carboplatin, and doxorubicin. Naranjo's scale showed 92% of ADRs as probable and 7% as possible. Severity scale showed 80.2% of ADRs were of moderate (level 3 and 4) severity, 11.6% of mild (level 1 and 2) severity, and 8.2% of level 5 severity. A total of 26.8% of ADRs were deemed preventable and 73.2% were not preventable.

Conclusions:

Our study provides safety data regarding the usage of anti-cancer drugs. Hence, it creates alertness among the treating doctors to prevent its recurrence.

RETRACTED: The role of antibiotics in the preparation of antitumor drugs under fuzzy system

This article has been retracted. A retraction notice can be found at https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-219320.

Functional Capacity Change Impacts the Quality of Life of Hospitalized Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare the quality of life (QOL) of patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation who improved their functional capacity during hospitalization (increased functional capacity group) with that of patients who maintained or decreased functional capacity during hospitalization (decreased functional capacity group).

DESIGN

This observational, longitudinal study included 27 hospitalized patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Patients were divided into increased functional capacity group (16 patients) and decreased functional capacity group (11 patients). Functional capacity (6-min step test), peripheral muscle strength (sit-to-stand test and handgrip strength), and QOL (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer) were assessed at admission and at hospital discharge.

RESULTS

Increased functional capacity patients had increased functional capacity and peripheral muscle strength of the lower and upper limbs at hospital discharge (P < 0.01, <0.01, and 0.02, respectively). The patients in the increased functional capacity group demonstrated an increase in global health and reduced symptoms at discharge (P = 0.02 and 0.03, respectively). No significant differences were observed between groups in the functional domain.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, who have improved functional capacity at discharge, also experience an improved QOL, with no such improvement noted among patients who have stable or reduced functional capacity. We recommend that the treatment protocol for hospitalized patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation include an exercise program aimed at improving functional capacity.

Serious adverse effects occurring after chemotherapy: A general cancer registry-based incidence survey

AIMS

Pharmaco-epidemiological surveys enable the frequency of serious adverse effects-and also the determining factors of their occurrence and seriousness-to be quantified. Few studies systematically gathering post-chemotherapy adverse effects data have been conducted. The objective was to assess the incidence of post-chemotherapy serious adverse effects on the basis of cancer registry data.

METHODS

The population was composed of new invasive cancer cases, with the exception of haematopoietic tumours and cutaneous carcinomas. These cancers were identified in 2012 among patients living at the time of diagnosis in a region covered by a general cancer registry and by a French regional pharmacovigilance centre, and treated with neo-adjuvant and/or adjuvant first-intention chemotherapy, followed or not by radiotherapy. The study was based on a sample of 1000 patients from the registry, followed by the collection of serious adverse effects and the required information to constitute a pharmacovigilance file.

RESULTS

Chemotherapy was associated with a particularly high incidence of serious adverse effects, affecting 44.5% (41.4-47.5%) of the patients. The highest incidence rates were observed when patients were exposed to topo-isomerase II inhibitors such as etoposide and bleomycin (69.2%), vinca-alkaloids (66.7%), topo-isomerase I inhibitors (54.5%) and platinum derivatives (52.0%). The clinical context was also linked to incidence, especially in case of metastases (53.3%) and comorbidities (51.3%). Substantial differences were found according to localisation, with a particularly high incidence in bronchial-pulmonary cancers (59.0%).

CONCLUSION

The high overall incidence rate of serious adverse effects should motivate a reinforcement of information about drug toxicities and improve knowledge by drawing on patient reporting.

Surveillance of adverse drug reactions and drug-drug interactions with pediatric oncology patients in a south Indian tertiary care hospital

OBJECTIVE

The present study was conducted to evaluate the pattern of occurrence of adverse drug reactions and drug-drug interaction in a pediatric oncology unit of a tertiary care hospital.

METHODS

A prospective, observational study was conducted in the Department of Pediatric Oncology, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Hospital, India. Patients were monitored actively for the occurrences of any adverse drug reaction during the study period. Patient's demographic details, clinical, and treatment data were collected for drug-drug interaction analysis. The detected adverse drug reaction was assessed for causality, severity, and preventability. Drug-drug interaction identified was rated based on their level of urgency and the nature of actions necessary to respond to an interaction.

RESULTS

Of 176 patients, 118 were detected for the occurrence of various adverse drug reaction. The majority of the cases were suffering with acute lymphocytic leukemia (67.9%). Vincristine was noted for a maximum number of adverse drug reaction in cytotoxic drugs. Rash is the most frequently occurred reaction. Assessment of causality showed that the majority of cases are "probable" (60.16%). In evaluating the severity of adverse drug reactions, 57.6% reactions were moderately severe and 74.5% of the reactions were preventable. Upon assessing the drug-drug interaction, 38.13% of the prescription needs to be monitored and 10 drug-drug interactions were under the risk category of "X." The majority of the adverse drug reaction was moderately severe in nature and those were preventable.

CONCLUSION

Since pediatrics are vulnerable population, they must have a thorough surveillance system for adverse drug reaction and drug-drug interaction; thereby, a positive impact on the medication-use system and improved patient care can be achieved.

A retrospective analysis of reporting of adverse drug reactions to oncology drugs: An experience from a national center of clinical excellence

INTRODUCTION:

Adverse drug reaction (ADR) is a public health problem which constitutes one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In India, only a few studies reported cancer chemotherapy-induced ADRs. The objectives of the present study were to assess the organ system involved, frequency, severity, and preventability of the ADRs occurred.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Data on ADRs of retrospective cohorts were extracted from the filled ADR forms received from the department of radiation oncology. Descriptive statistic was used to summarize and analyze the available data, namely patient demography, causality, severity, and preventability of the event.

RESULTS:

A total of 191 chemotherapy-induced ADR reports were received from 164 patients during the period March 2015 to August 2017. Almost three-fourth of the ADRs occurred in patients who were receiving regimens involving multiple drugs. Taxanes, alkylating agents, and platinum compounds were the common drug groups involved. The skin (n = 90) was the most frequently involved organ with alopecia and hyperpigmentation as most common manifestations. The severity (Hartwig and Siegel) and preventability scales (Modified Schumock and Thornton) indicated that most reactions were mild (54.45%) in nature and the majority of them were preventable. More than two-third (69%) of the reactions were related “possible” to the suspected drug as determined by the World Health Organization causality assessment.

CONCLUSION:

Chemotherapy-related ADRs among cancer patients are worrisome. It has a negative impact on patient quality of life and in addition increases cost of therapy. It is found that timely reporting of chemotherapy-related ADRs and having an effective ADR monitoring system in place ensure preventability of the ADRs in many cases. Oncologists, Radiotherapists and Onco-surgeons should be actively involved in ADR reporting (Onco-Pharmacovigilance) and exchange constructive information, update and educate each other about appropriate use of anticancer drugs. Onco-pharmacovigilance is the need of the hour and could be of immense value in reducing morbidity and mortality if practiced with utmost importance.

A UHPLC-MS/MS-based method for the simultaneous monitoring of eight antiblastic drugs in plasma and urine of exposed healthcare workers

Exposure of healthcare workers to anticancer drugs requires the combined action of environmental and biological monitoring to assess the effective level of exposure to these chemicals, to improve awareness and to avoid adverse health effects on this category of workers. Cancer chemotherapeutic drugs show different mechanisms of action due to diverse chemical structures; consequently, they differ in hydrophobicity, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Therefore, the appearance, accumulation and elimination of each of these molecules in body fluids and tissues might be extremely variable; this prompts the need for a rapid and versatile analytical protocol for the biological monitoring of possible exposure of workers involved in the manipulation, administration and disposal of cancer chemotherapeutic drugs. In this paper we describe the development, optimization and validation of a UHPLC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous quasi-quantitative analysis of eight widely used antineoplastic drugs, which can be used for the analysis of both urine and blood samples. This methodology was applied to the biological monitoring of healthcare workers exposed to different extents to antiblastic drugs at the University Hospital "San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona" in Salerno (Italy), and allowed to identify two subjects exposed to irinotecan out of a total of fifteen workers analyzed.

Assessment of drug therapy problems among patients with cervical cancer at Kenyatta National Hospital, Kenya

Background

Although cervical cancer is preventable, it is still the second leading cause of cancer deaths among women in the world. Further, it is estimated that around 5–10% of hospital admissions are due to drug related problems (DRPs), of which 50% are avoidable. In cancer therapy, there is an immense potential for DRPs due to the high toxicity of most chemotherapeutic regimens. Hence, this study sought to assess DRPs among patients with cervical cancer at Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH).

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted at the oncology units of KNH. A total of 81 study participants were recruited through simple random sampling. Data were collected from medical records and interviewing patients. The appropriateness of medical therapy was evaluated by comparing with National Compressive Cancer Network and European Society for Medical Oncology practice guideline of cervical cancer treatment protocol. The degree of adherence was determined using eight-item Morisky medication adherence scale. The likelihood of drug interaction was assessed using Medscape, Micromedex and Epocrates drug interaction checkers. The data were entered in Microsoft Excel and analysed using statistical software STATA version 13.0. Descriptive statistics such as mean, percent and frequency were used to summarise patients’ characteristics. Univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression were used to investigate the potential predictors of DRPs.

Result

A total of 215 DRPs were identified from 76 patients, translating to a prevalence of 93.8% and a mean of 2.65 ± 1.22 DRPs. The predominant proportion of DRPs (48.2%) was identified in patients who had been treated with chemoradiation regimens. Adverse drug reactions 56(69.1%) and drug interactions 38(46.9%) were the most prevalent DRPs. Majority (67.9%) of the study population were adherent to their treatment regimens. Forgetfulness 18(69.2%), expensive medications 4(15.4%) and side effects of medications 4(15.4%) were the main reasons for medication non-adherence. Patients with advanced stage cervical cancer were 15.4 times (AOR = 15.4, 95% CI = 1.3–185.87, p = 0.031) more likely to have DRPs as compared to patients with early stage disease.

Conclusion

Adverse drug reactions, drug interactions, and need of additional drug therapy were the most common DRPs identified among cervical cancer patients. Advanced stage cervical cancer was the only predictor of DRPs.