Comparative effectiveness of oral prostacyclin pathway drugs on hospitalization in patients with pulmonary hypertension in the United States: a retrospective database analysis

Oral Prostacyclin Pathway Agents Used in PAH: A Targeted Literature Review

Purpose

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare and progressive pulmonary vascular disease that can result in right heart failure and death. Oral prostacyclins play an important role in the management of intermediate-low risk PAH. This targeted literature review (TLR) aimed to identify and compare evidence supporting use of oral prostacyclin pathway agents (PPAs: selexipag and oral treprostinil) in intermediate-low risk PAH.

Methods

A targeted literature review was conducted. Literature databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane reviews) were searched for studies describing clinical practice and treatment outcomes for oral treprostinil and selexipag globally, published in English (2012 to 2022). Electronic searches were supplemented by manual-searches of targeted conferences (2020 to 2022), and reference lists of identified publications were reviewed. One reviewer assessed studies for eligibility.

Results

In total, 95 publications met inclusion criteria: 47 full-text articles (selexipag n = 22; oral treprostinil n = 16; selexipag and oral treprostinil n = 9) and 48 conference materials. Selexipag and oral treprostinil target the prostacyclin pathway differently; their label-supporting trials had different primary endpoints (disease progression and hospitalization vs exercise capacity and disease progression), differing baseline therapy (0, 1 or 2 vs 0 or 1 baseline treatments), titration duration and dosing (personalized dose capped at 1600 ug twice daily (BID) vs increasing doses over time with no maximum dose), respectively. While both oral PPAs have demonstrated reduced risk of disease progression, only selexipag showed reduction in hospitalization rates. Oral PPAs have been shown to reduce healthcare costs in real-world clinical practice. This difference is reflected in labeled indications.

Conclusion

Given differences in trial- and real-world outcomes, number of prior therapies, and dosing, personalizing the choice of oral PPA is critical to maximizing the benefit for individual patients.

Hospitalization-related costs associated with oral agents targeting the prostacyclin pathway for pulmonary arterial hypertension

AIMS

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare, progressive, and ultimately fatal form of the broader condition pulmonary hypertension. ESC/ERS guidelines recommend therapy targeting the prostacyclin pathway for patients not achieving low-risk mortality status. Currently, only oral selexipag (OS) and oral treprostinil (OT) have this mechanism of action and are available in the United States (US). A recent database analysis has shown significantly lower hospitalization risk for patients treated with OS versus OT. Nevertheless, differences in hospitalization and treatment costs among PAH patients taking oral prostacyclin pathway agents (PPAs) in the US healthcare system remain unclear. This study aims to estimate the difference in costs for patients who achieve a stable maintenance dose from a US payer perspective.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We developed a cost calculator including direct medical costs from the US third-party payer perspective to estimate PAH-related hospitalizations and costs associated with oral PPA use over 2 years, in a hypothetical US payer plan with 1 million members. The treatment-eligible population was estimated from real-world epidemiological data. Treatment-specific hospitalizations were estimated from a study using the Optum Clinformatics administrative claims database. Influence of each model parameter was tested in one-way sensitivity analyses (OWSA), while scenario analysis tested the impact of key assumptions.

RESULTS

For 78 PAH patients included in the model, the base case scenario estimated total costs of $46,736,768 with 98 PAH-related admissions for OS, and total costs of $60,113,620 and 161 PAH-related admissions over 2 years for OT. Using OS was associated with 22.3% cost reduction and 39.1% hospitalizations averted; the number of patients needed treated with selexipag to avoid one hospital admission was 1.23. OWSA indicated medication cost was the most sensitive parameter, followed by population parameters.

LIMITATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS

OS use over 2 years would result in lower total, drug, and hospitalization-related costs compared with OT, thus providing financial savings for payers.

Comparison of Healthcare Encounters and Drug Persistence in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Receiving Oral Selexipag, Inhaled Iloprost, or Parenteral Treprostinil: A Retrospective Database Analysis

Background: Agents targeting the prostacyclin (PGI₂) pathway are important in managing pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). No head-to-head clinical trials have compared outcomes between the 3 different PGI₂-pathway drugs most commonly available in countries with advanced healthcare: oral selexipag, inhaled iloprost, and parenteral (subcutaneous or intravenous) treprostinil. Objectives: To conduct retrospective database analyses to describe characteristics of patients with PAH initiating therapy with these agents and compare the rate and risk of healthcare facility encounters and drug persistence. Methods: Data were obtained from the Optum™ Clinformatics® Data Mart and Truven™ Health Analytics® MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters databases from July 1, 2008, to September 30, 2020 (Optum™), or October 31, 2020 (Truven™). Patients were categorized into index-drug cohorts based on first pharmacy claims for selexipag, inhaled iloprost, or parenteral treprostinil. Eligible patients were ≥18 years of age with ≥1 ICD-9-CM or ICD-10-CM diagnosis code indicating pulmonary hypertension and no diagnosis code suggesting Group 3-5 pulmonary hypertension. Rates of hospitalization (inpatient admissions), emergency room visits, or outpatient visits per person-year were calculated. Drug persistence was measured as time to discontinuation of index drug. Multivariable analyses were performed to compare outcomes with selexipag vs inhaled iloprost and parenteral treprostinil, adjusting for baseline characteristics using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Results: Overall, 583 patients were included in the Optum™ sample and 482 in the Truven™ sample. Mean (SD) age was 61.7 (14.5) and 49.3 (11.3) years, respectively; 74.4% and 75.7% of patients, respectively, were women. In the pooled samples, after adjustment for baseline characteristics, selexipag had a lower risk than inhaled iloprost or parenteral treprostinil for hospitalization (relative rate ratio [95% CI], 0.40 [0.22, 0.75], and 0.26 [0.17, 0.39]) and outpatient visits (0.66 [0.56, 0.78] and 0.76 [0.66, 0.88]). Trends toward lower risk of emergency room visits did not attain statistical significance. Drug discontinuation risk was 16% and 36% lower with selexipag vs parenteral treprostinil and inhaled iloprost, respectively. Conclusions: In real-world use, selexipag appears to be associated with lower rates of hospitalization and outpatient visits than inhaled iloprost or parenteral treprostinil. Further research is required to identify factors underlying these differences.

Efficacy and safety of selexipag, an oral prostacyclin receptor agonist for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the effect and safety of selexipag in the treatment of pulmonary hypertension and to explore the effect of selexipag on cardiac function indexes in PAH patients.

METHODS

Electronic databases, including the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PubMed databases, were searched. Endnote software X9 was used for study selection, and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used for literature screening and quality assessment. Data analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software, and GRADE was used to assess the evidence level.

RESULTS

Ten studies were finally selected in accordance with the standard. A total of 10 papers were included. A total of 1322 patients were included, including 723 in the trial group and 599 in the control group. Patients with PAH treated with selexipag were included in the trial group, and patients with PAH treated with placebo were included in the control group. The results of the study showed that selexipag was effective in reducing mortality in patients (WMD=0.70, 95% CI: 0.53-0.94, P = 0.02). Selexipag effectively increased the 6-min walk distance (WMD=33.79, 95% CI: 2.69-64.90, P=0.03). Selexipag also effectively increased the 6-min distance between baseline and follow-up (WMD = 15.28, 95% CI: 7.76-22.80, P < 0.0001). Selexipag effectively reduced PVR (WMD = -230.96, 95% CI: 445.94 to -15.97, P = 0.04). Selexipag significantly reduced PVR between baseline and follow-up (WMD = -139.62, 95% CI: 215.32 to -63.91, P = 0.0003). The adverse reactions of selexipag were mild with headache, diarrhea and nausea reported as the main symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Selexipag is a new drug with mild adverse reactions and is safe for the treatment of PAH. This drug significantly prolongs the level of 6MWD in PAH patients, reduces the fatality rate, improves WHO FC and reduces PVR. The effects of this drug on CI, mPAP, MRAP, SvO₂ and other indicators still need to be further confirmed.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

CRD42021245557.