Exercise and fluid challenge during right heart catheterisation for evaluation of dyspnoea

Pulmonary hypertension associated with left heart disease

Left heart disease (LHD) is the most common cause of pulmonary hypertension (PH), which may be classified further as isolated post-capillary (ipcPH) or combined post- and pre-capillary PH (cpcPH). The 7th World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension PH-LHD task force reviewed newly reported randomised clinical trials and contemplated novel opportunities for improving outcome. Results from major randomised clinical trials reinforced prior recommendations against the use of pulmonary arterial hypertension therapy in PH-LHD outside of clinical trials, and suggested possible harm. Greater focus on phenotyping was viewed as one general strategy by which to ultimately improve clinical outcomes. This is potentially achievable by individualising ipcPH versus cpcPH diagnosis for patients with pulmonary arterial wedge pressure within a diagnostic grey zone (12-18 mmHg), and through a newly developed PH-LHD staging system. In this model, PH accompanies LHD across four stages (A=at risk, B=structural heart disease, C=symptomatic heart disease, D=advanced), with each stage characterised by progression in clinical characteristics, haemodynamics and potential therapeutic strategies. Along these lines, the task force proposed disaggregating PH-LHD to emphasise specific subtypes for which PH prevalence, pathophysiology and treatment are unique. This includes re-interpreting mitral and aortic valve stenosis through a contemporary lens, and focusing on PH within the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and amyloid cardiomyopathy clinical spectra. Furthermore, appreciating LHD in the profile of PH patients with chronic lung disease and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease is essential. However, engaging LHD patients in clinical research more broadly is likely to require novel methodologies such as pragmatic trials and may benefit from next-generation analytics to interpret results.

Utility and Validity of the HFA-PEFF and H2FPEF Scores in Patients With Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) represents a significant clinical challenge. Two diagnostic scoring tools have been developed to aid the noninvasive diagnosis of HFpEF: the HFA-PEFF (Heart Failure Association Pre-test assessment, Echocardiography and natriuretic peptide, Functional testing, Final etiology) and the H2FPEF scoring systems.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of these 2 scoring tools for the diagnosis of HFpEF against a gold standard of invasive evaluation in a cohort of patients with AF.

METHODS

The authors recruited consecutive patients with symptomatic AF and preserved ejection fraction who were scheduled for an AF ablation procedure. Gold-standard invasive diagnosis of HFpEF was performed at the AF ablation procedure using mean left atrial pressure at rest and following infusion of 500 mL fluid. Each participant was scored according to the noninvasive HFA-PEFF and H2FPEF scoring systems. Sensitivity and specificity analyses were performed to assess the accuracy of these scoring systems in diagnosing HFpEF.

RESULTS

In total, 120 participants were recruited. HFpEF was diagnosed invasively in 88 (73.3%) participants, whereas 32 (26.7%) had no HFpEF. Using the HFA-PEFF score, 38 (31.7%) participants had a high probability of HFpEF and 82 (68.3%) had low/intermediate probability of HFpEF. Using the H2FPEF tool, 72 (60%) participants had a high probability of HFpEF and 48 (40%) had intermediate probability. A high HFA-PEFF (≥5 points) score could diagnose HFpEF with a sensitivity of 40% and a specificity of 91%, and a high H2FPEF score (≥6 points) could diagnose HFpEF with a sensitivity of 69% and specificity of 66%. Overall diagnostic accuracy was similar using both tools (AUC: 0.663 vs 0.707, respectively; P = 0.636).

CONCLUSIONS

Against a gold standard of invasively diagnosed HFpEF, the HFA-PEFF and H2FPEF scores demonstrate only moderate accuracy in patients with AF and should be utilized with caution in this cohort of patients. (Characterising Left Atrial Function and Compliance in Atrial Fibrillation; ACTRN12620000639921).

Pulmonary hypertension in the setting of interstitial lung disease: Approach to management and treatment. A consensus statement from the Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute's Innovative Drug Development Initiative-Group 3 Pulmonary Hypertension

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) due to interstitial lung disease (ILD), a commonly encountered complication of fibrotic ILDs, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Until recently, the studies of pulmonary vasodilator therapy in PH-ILD have been largely disappointing, with some even demonstrating the potential for harm. This paper is part of a series of Consensus Statements from the Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute's Innovative Drug Development Initiative for Group 3 Pulmonary Hypertension, with prior publications covering pathogenesis, prevalence, clinical features, phenotyping, clinical trials, and impact of PH-ILD. It offers a comprehensive review of and a holistic approach to treatment of PH-ILD, including the management of underlying interstitial lung diseases, importance of treating the comorbidities, emphasis on importance of exercise and palliation of dyspnea, and review of the most up-to-date guidelines for referral for potential lung transplant work up. It also summarizes the prior, ongoing, and possibly future studies in treatment of the vascular derangement of this morbid condition.

Identification of Subclinical Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction in Patients With Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) commonly coexist. We hypothesize that patients with symptomatic AF but without overt clinical HF commonly exhibit subclinical HFpEF according to established hemodynamic criteria.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to use invasive hemodynamics to investigate the prevalence and implications of subclinical HFpEF in AF ablation patients.

METHODS

Consecutive symptomatic AF ablation patients were prospectively recruited. Diagnosis of subclinical HFpEF was undertaken by invasive assessment of left atrial pressure (LAP). Participants had HFpEF if the baseline mean LAP was >15 mm Hg and early HFpEF if the mean LAP was >15 mm Hg after a 500-mL fluid challenge. LA compliance was assessed invasively by monitoring the LAP and LA diameter during direct LA infusion of 15 mL/kg normal saline. LA compliance was calculated as Δ LA diameter/ΔLAP. LA cardiomyopathy was further studied with exercise echocardiography and electrophysiology study. Functional impact was evaluated using cardiopulmonary exercise testing and the AF Symptom Severity questionnaire.

RESULTS

Of 120 participants, 57 (47.5%) had HFpEF, 31 (25.8%) had early HFpEF, and 32 (26.7%) had no HFpEF. Both HFpEF and early HFpEF were associated with lower LA compliance compared with those without HFpEF (P < 0.001). Participants with HFpEF and early HFpEF also displayed decreased LA emptying fraction (P = 0.004), decreased LA voltage (P = 0.001), decreased VO2peak (P < 0.001), and increased AF symptom burden (P = 0.002) compared with those without HFpEF.

CONCLUSIONS

Subclinical HFpEF is common in AF ablation patients and is characterized by a LA cardiomyopathy, decreased cardiopulmonary reserve and increased symptom burden. The diagnosis of HFpEF may identify patients with AF with the potential to benefit from novel HFpEF therapies. (Characterising Left Atrial Function and Compliance in Atrial Fibrillation; ACTRN12620000639921).

Hemodynamic Responses to Provocative Maneuvers during Right Heart Catheterization

Rationale: Current guidelines recognize the utility of provocative maneuvers during right heart catheterization to aid the diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension. Few studies have compared the performance of different provocation maneuvers. Objectives: To assess the hemodynamic correlation among three provocative maneuvers, including their effect on pulmonary hypertension classification. Methods: This prospective trial was conducted between October 2016 and May 2018. Adult patients underwent three provocative maneuvers during right heart catheterization: passive leg raise (PLR), load-targeted supine bicycle exercise, and rapid crystalloid fluid infusion. Patients were classified as follows: no pulmonary hypertension, precapillary pulmonary hypertension, isolated postcapillary pulmonary hypertension, combined pre- and postcapillary pulmonary hypertension, and uncategorized pulmonary hypertension. We assessed the hemodynamic changes associated with each maneuver. We also assessed whether provocative maneuvers led to hemodynamic reclassification of the patient to either postcapillary pulmonary hypertension with provocation or exercise pulmonary hypertension. Results: Eighty-five patients (mean age 62 ± 12 years, 53% women) were included. Correlation between exercise and fluid challenge was moderate to strong (0.49-0.82; P < 0.001) for changes in right atrial pressure, mean pulmonary arterial pressure, pulmonary arterial wedge pressure, and cardiac index from baseline. Correlation between PLR and exercise (0.4-0.65; P < 0.001) and between PLR and fluid challenge (0.45-0.6; P < 0.001) was moderate for changes in right atrial pressure, mean pulmonary arterial pressure, pulmonary arterial wedge pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, and cardiac index. Hemodynamic correlation between other provocative maneuvers was poor. Depending on provocative maneuver and classification criteria, there was significant variation in the number of patients reclassified as having exercise pulmonary hypertension (3-50%) or postcapillary pulmonary hypertension with provocation (11-48%). Conclusions: Hemodynamic determinations during exercise and fluid challenge showed moderate to strong hemodynamic correlation. Moderate hemodynamic correlation was seen between PLR and exercise or fluid challenge. Although some provocative maneuvers demonstrate good hemodynamic correlation, there is inconsistency when using these maneuvers to identify patients with postcapillary or exercise pulmonary hypertension.

Comparison between thermodilution and Fick methods for resting and exercise-induced cardiac output measurement in patients with chronic dyspnea

Studies comparing thermodilution (TD) and the direct Fick method (dFM) for cardiac output (CO) measurement are rare. We compared CO measurements between TD (2-5 cold water injections), the dFM, and indirect Fick method (iFM) at rest and during exercise, and assessed the effect of averaging different numbers of TD measurements during exercise. This retrospective study included 300 patients (52.3% women, mean age 66 ± 11 years) having pulmonary hypertension (76.0%) or unexplained dyspnea. Invasive hemodynamic and gas exchange parameters were measured at rest (supine; n = 300) and during unloaded cycling (semi-supine; n = 275) and 25-W exercise (semi-supine; n = 240). All three methods showed significant differences in CO measurement (ΔCO) at rest (p ≤ 0.001; ΔCO > 1 L/min: 45.0% [iFM vs. dFM], 42.0% [iFM vs. TD], and 45.7% [TD vs. dFM]). ΔCO (TD vs. dFM) was significant during unloaded cycling (p < 0.001; ΔCO > 1 L/min: 56.6%) but not during 25-W exercise (p = 0.137; ΔCO > 1 L/min: 52.8%). ΔCO (TD vs. dFM) during 25-W exercise was significant when using one or two (p ≤ 0.01) but not three (p = 0.06) TD measurements. Mean ΔCO (TD [≥3 measurements] vs. dFM) was -0.43 ± 1.98 and -0.06 ± 2.29 L/min during unloaded and 25-W exercise, respectively. Thus, TD and dFM CO measurements are comparable during 25-W exercise (averaging ≥3 TD measurements), but not during unloaded cycling or at rest. Individual ΔCOs vary substantially and require critical interpretation to avoid CO misclassification.

Correlation of Hemodynamic and Respiratory Parameters in Invasive Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing (iCPET)

Background: Invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing (iCPET) is an integral part in the advanced diagnostic workup of pulmonary hypertension (PH). Our study evaluated the relation between hemodynamic and respiratory parameters at two different resting conditions and two defined low exercise levels with a close synchronization of measurements in a broad variety of dyspnea patients. Subjects and methods: We included 146 patients (median age 69 years, range 22 to 85 years, n = 72 female) with dyspnea of uncertain origin. Invasive hemodynamic and gas exchange parameters were measured at rest, 45° upright position, unloaded cycling, 25 and 50 W exercise. All measurements were performed in a single RHC procedure. Results: Oxygen uptake (VO2/body mass) correlated significantly with cardiac index (all p ≤ 0.002) at every resting and exercise level and with every method of cardiac output measurement (thermodilution, method of Fick). Mean pulmonary arterial pressure (PAPmean) correlated with all respiratory parameters (respiratory rate, partial end-tidal pressures of oxygen and carbon dioxide [petCO2 and petO2], ventilation/carbon dioxide resp. oxygen ratio [VE/VCO2, VE/VO2], and minute ventilation [VE], all p < 0.05). These correlations improved with increasing exercise levels from rest via unloaded cycling to 25 W. There was no correlation with right atrial or pulmonary arterial wedge pressure. Summary: In dyspnea patients of different etiologies, the cardiac index is closely linked to VO2 at every level of rest and submaximal exercise. PAPmean is the only pressure that correlates with different respiratory parameters, but this correlation is highly significant and stable at rest, unloaded cycling and at 25 W.

[Invasive Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing: A Review]

Right heart catheterization (RHC) is the internationally standardized reference method for measuring pulmonary hemodynamics under resting conditions. In recent years, increasing efforts have been made to establish the reliable assessment of exercise hemodynamics as well, in order to obtain additional diagnostic and prognostic data. Furthermore, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), as the most comprehensive non-invasive exercise test, is increasingly performed in combination with RHC providing detailed pathophysiological insights into the exercise response, so-called invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing (iCPET).In this review, the accumulated experience with iCPET is presented and methodological details are discussed. This complex examination is especially helpful in differentiating the underlying causes of unexplained dyspnea. In particular, early forms of cardiac or pulmonary vascular dysfunction can be detected by integrated analysis of hemodynamic as well as ventilatory and gas exchange data. It is expected that with increasing validation of iCPET parameters, a more reliable differentiation of normal from pathological stress reactions will be possible.