Diagnosis and outcome in a prehospital cohort of patients with bundle branch block and suspected acute myocardial infarction

New permanent bundle-branch block and long-term prognosis of patients with new onset ST-elevation myocardial infarction who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention

Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the potential predictive value of permanent RBBB and LBBB for longer-term prognosis in patients with new-onset STEMI who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods: Patients with new-onset STEMI that underwent emergency PCI at our department from June 2012 to September 2020 were included in the study. Gensini score (GS) was employed to evaluate the severity of coronary lesions. The primary endpoint of the study was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), the composite of cardiac mortality, recurrence of myocardial infarction, cardiac shock, stroke, stent thrombosis, or revascularization. We also set all-cause mortality as a secondary endpoint.

Results: Out of the 547 patients, 29 patients had new-onset permanent LBBB, 51 patients had new-onset permanent RBBB, and 467 patients had no bundle-branch block (BBB). The occurrence of no BBB, new permanent LBBB, or RBBB was not associated with the severity of coronary artery lesions as evaluated by the GS. After follow-up at an average of 43.93 months, MACCEs occurred in 52 patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients with new-onset RBBB were at greater risk for MACCEs compared to those with new onset LBBB (χ² = 5.107, p = 0.021). Also, an independent correlation was found between new permanent RBBB and LBBB and MACCEs risk. The adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were 6.862 [95% confidence interval (CI) of 3.764–12.510] for the new-onset permanent RBBB and 3.395 (95% CI of 1.280–9.005) for LBBB, compared to those with no BBB, respectively (both p < 0.05).

Conclusion: New onset permanent RBBB in patients with new onset STEMI who underwent PCI may be correlated independently with increased risk of poor long-term prognosis.

Clinical characteristics and the severity of coronary atherosclerosis of different subtypes of bundle-branch block

BACKGROUND

Right bundle-branch block (RBBB) and left bundle-branch block (LBBB) play a role in the pathogenesis and progression of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the clinical features and the severity of coronary artery disease associated with different subtypes of bundle-branch block, according to time of new appearance, is not well characterized in patients with no known CAD.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data pertaining to consecutive patients with RBBB or LBBB who underwent coronary angiography. The severity of coronary lesions was evaluated using the SYNTAX score. The differential effect of new-onset RBBB, old RBBB, new-onset LBBB, and old LBBB on the severity of CAD and its association with clinical characteristics was quantified. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of RBBB and LBBB on the degree of coronary atherosclerosis in patients without known CAD.

RESULTS

Out of the 243 patients, 72 patients had old LBBB, 37 had new-onset LBBB, 93 patients had old RBBB, and 41 patients had new-onset RBBB. On univariate analysis, age, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, creatinine, serum glucose, and glycosylated hemoglobin level were associated with high SYNTAX score (p < .05 for all). Patients in the new-onset RBBB, old RBBB, new-onset LBBB, and old LBBB groups showed significant differences in baseline characteristics and coronary atherosclerosis (p < .05 for all). However, there were no significant between-group differences with respect to the degree of coronary atherosclerosis as assessed by SYNTAX score.

CONCLUSIONS

New-onset RBBB, old RBBB, new-onset LBBB, and old LBBB were not associated with the severity of coronary lesions as assessed by SYNTAX score in patients without known CAD.

Right bundle brunch block in patients with acute myocardial infarction is associated with a higher in-hospital arrhythmic risk and mortality, and a worse prognosis after discharge

INTRODUCTION

Recently, the presence of right bundle brunch block (RBBB) in patients with persistent ischaemic symptoms has been suggested as an indication for emergent coronary angiography.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic impact of RBBB in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) before the implementation of the recent recommendations.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied consecutive patients admitted with AMI between 2011 and 2013. Patients with left bundle brunch block, pacemaker, or nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay were excluded. Patients with RBBB were compared with those without RBBB. Clinical characteristics, in-hospital evolution, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) during follow-up, defined as cardiovascular death, sustained ventricular arrhythmias, acute heart failure syndromes, recurrent myocardial infarction, or acute stroke, were analysed.

RESULTS

The analysis included 481 patients. Thirty two patients (6.7%) had RBBB. Patients with RBBB were older. During hospital admission, RBBB patients had a higher rate of sustained ventricular tachycardia and death. Survival curve analysis showed that patients with RBBB had a lower in-hospital survival rate (Log-rank, p = 0.004). After discharge, during a mean follow-up time of 24.3 ± 11.6 months, 53 patients (12%) died. Survival curve analysis showed a lower survival rate free of MACE for those patients with RBBB (Log-rank, p = 0.011). RBBB was independently associated with MACE occurrence (HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.07-4.43; p = 0.033), after adjusting for demographic data, coronary angiography findings, treatment performed, echocardiographic evaluation, and medical therapy.

CONCLUSION

Patients with RBBB had a higher rate of in-hospital mortality and arrhythmic events, and an increased risk of MACE during follow-up.

Association of QRS duration with left ventricular volume and ejection fraction after anterior myocardial infarction assessed by gated single photon emission computed tomography

BACKGROUND

Even intermediate QRS prolongation without bundle branch block is associated with worse clinical outcome after myocardial infarction (MI). We assessed the association of QRS duration with left ventricular (LV) volume and ejection fraction after anterior MI by using quantitative gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).

METHODS

Eighty-two patients with prior anterior MI were enrolled. Intermediate QRS prolongation was defined as QRS duration ≥100 ms without bundle branch block. Quantitative analysis of thallium SPECT was performed on the redistribution image. LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), end-systolic volume (LVESV) and ejection fraction (LVEF) were obtained.

RESULTS

There were 25 patients with intermediate QRS prolongation and 57 patients with normal QRS duation. Compared to patients with normal QRS duration, patients with intermediate QRS prolongation had larger LVEDV (137.4 ± 75.1 ml vs 87.9 ± 43.6 ml, p = .004), larger LVESV (89.9 ± 69.6 ml vs 49.2 ± 35.5 ml, p = .009) and lower LVEF (39.3 ± 14.6% vs 47.6 ± 12.0%, p = .02). QRS duration was positively associated with LVEDV (r = 0.49, p < .001) and LVESV (r = 0.47, p < .001), and was inversely associated with LVEF (r= -0.32, p < .001). Multivariate analysis showed that male sex (β = 0.22, p = .04), QRS duration (β = 0.34, p = .002) and number of abnormal Q waves (β = 0.37, p < .001) were associated with LVEDV. QRS duration (β= -0.32, p = .003) and number of abnormal Q waves (β = -0.40, p < .001) were associated with LVEF.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that QRS duration as well as number of abnormal Q waves is independently associated with LV volume and ejection fraction after anterior MI.

A comparison of rescue and primary percutaneous coronary interventions for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction

Objective

To perform a comparative analysis of in-hospital results obtained from patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), who underwent rescue or primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim is to determine rescue PCI as a practical option for patients with no immediate access to primary PCI.

Methods

From the Cardiology PCI Clinic of the National Hospital of Sri Lanka (NHSL), we selected all consecutive patients presenting with acute STEMI </ = 24 h door-to-balloon delay for primary PCI and </ = 72 h door-to-balloon delay, (90 min after failed thrombolysis) for rescue PCI, from March 2013 to April 2015 and their in-hospital results were analyzed, comparing rescue and primary PCI patients.

Results

We evaluated 159 patients; 78 underwent rescue PCI and 81 underwent primary PCI. The culprit left anterior descending (LAD) vessel (76.9% vs. 58.8%; P = 0.015) was more prevalent in rescue than in primary patients. Thrombus aspiration was less frequent in rescue group (19.2% vs. 40.7%; p = 0.004). The degree of moderate-to-severe left ventricular dysfunction reflected by the ejection fraction <40% (24.3% vs. 23.7%; P = 0.927) and prevalence of multivessel disease (41.0% vs. 43.8%; P = 0.729) revealed no significant difference. Coronary stents were implanted at similar rates in both strategies (96.2% vs. 92.6%; P = 0.331). Procedural success (97.4% vs. 97.5%; P = 0.980) and mortality rates (5.1% vs. 3.8%; P = 0.674), were similar in the rescue and primary groups.

Conclusion

In-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) are similar in both rescue and primary intervention groups, supporting the former as a practical option for patients with no immediate access to PCI facilities.

Left ventricular ejection fraction and mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and bundle branch block

BACKGROUND

The aim of our study is to assess the effect of bundle branch block (BBB) on mortality and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients treated in the current era of percutaneous reperfusion therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, a total of 1123 STEMI patients treated in the University Medical Center Groningen from January 2011 until May 2013 were included. The follow-up duration was 2-4 years. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed within 2 weeks after STEMI.

RESULTS

In total, 23 (2.0%) patients presented with left BBB and 49 (4.4%) patients presented with right BBB. Two-year mortality after STEMI was 25.0% (n=18) in patients with BBB and 9.2% (n=97, P<0.001) in patients without BBB. Patients with BBB had more frequently a severely reduced LVEF (<30%) [20.0% (n=6) compared with 4.2% (n=21), P=0.002] and less frequently a normal LVEF [16.7% (n=5) compared with 35.7% (n=179), P=0.046]. After multivariable analysis, BBB did not remain an independent predictor of mortality, but was an independent predictor of reduced LVEF.

CONCLUSION

The presence of a BBB was an independent predictor of a reduced LVEF. However, we found no effect of BBB on 2-year mortality in the current era of percutaneous reperfusion therapy.

Prehospital diagnosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction

Primary percutaneous intervention (PPCI) is the preferred treatment in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) if this can be performed in a timely manner. The