1
|
Georgiopoulos G, Kraler S, Mueller-Hennessen M, Delialis D, Mavraganis G, Sopova K, Wenzl FA, Räber L, Biener M, Stähli BE, Maneta E, Spray L, Iglesias JF, Coelho-Lima J, Tual-Chalot S, Muller O, Mach F, Frey N, Duerschmied D, Langer HF, Katus H, Roffi M, Camici GG, Mueller C, Giannitsis E, Spyridopoulos I, Lüscher TF, Stellos K, Stamatelopoulos K. Modification of the GRACE Risk Score for Risk Prediction in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes. JAMA Cardiol 2023; 8:946-956. [PMID: 37647046 PMCID: PMC10469286 DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.2741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
Importance The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score, a guideline-recommended risk stratification tool for patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), does not consider the extent of myocardial injury. Objective To assess the incremental predictive value of a modified GRACE score incorporating high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) T at presentation, a surrogate of the extent of myocardial injury. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospectively designed longitudinal cohort study examined 3 independent cohorts of 9803 patients with ACS enrolled from September 2009 to December 2017; 2 ACS derivation cohorts (Heidelberg ACS cohort and Newcastle STEMI cohort) and an ACS validation cohort (SPUM-ACS study). The Heidelberg ACS cohort included 2535 and the SPUM-ACS study 4288 consecutive patients presenting with a working diagnosis of ACS. The Newcastle STEMI cohort included 2980 consecutive patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Data were analyzed from March to June 2023. Exposures In-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality risk estimates derived from an updated risk score that incorporates continuous hs-cTn T at presentation (modified GRACE). Main Outcomes and Measures The predictive value of continuous hs-cTn T and modified GRACE risk score compared with the original GRACE risk score. Study end points were all-cause mortality during hospitalization and at 30 days and 1 year after the index event. Results Of 9450 included patients, 7313 (77.4%) were male, and the mean (SD) age at presentation was 64.2 (12.6) years. Using continuous rather than binary hs-cTn T conferred improved discrimination and reclassification compared with the original GRACE score (in-hospital mortality: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.835 vs 0.741; continuous net reclassification improvement [NRI], 0.208; 30-day mortality: AUC, 0.828 vs 0.740; NRI, 0.312; 1-year mortality: AUC, 0.785 vs 0.778; NRI, 0.078) in the derivation cohort. These findings were confirmed in the validation cohort. In the pooled population of 9450 patients, modified GRACE risk score showed superior performance compared with the original GRACE risk score in terms of reclassification and discrimination for in-hospital mortality end point (AUC, 0.878 vs 0.780; NRI, 0.097), 30-day mortality end point (AUC, 0.858 vs 0.771; NRI, 0.08), and 1-year mortality end point (AUC, 0.813 vs 0.797; NRI, 0.056). Conclusions and Relevance In this study, using continuous rather than binary hs-cTn T at presentation, a proxy of the extent of myocardial injury, in the GRACE risk score improved the mortality risk prediction in patients with ACS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Georgiopoulos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Vascular Biology and Medicine Theme, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- Department of Cardiovascular Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Simon Kraler
- Center for Molecular Cardiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Mueller-Hennessen
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Heidelberg/Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Dimitrios Delialis
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece
| | - Georgios Mavraganis
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece
| | - Kateryna Sopova
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Vascular Biology and Medicine Theme, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Heidelberg/Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology, Hemostaseology and Medical Intensive Care, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
- Department of Cardiovascular Research, European Center for Angioscience, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
- Department of Cardiology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Florian A. Wenzl
- Center for Molecular Cardiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lorenz Räber
- Department of Cardiology, Swiss Heart Center, Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Moritz Biener
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Barbara E. Stähli
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Eleni Maneta
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece
| | - Luke Spray
- Department of Cardiology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Juan F. Iglesias
- Department of Cardiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jose Coelho-Lima
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Vascular Biology and Medicine Theme, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Simon Tual-Chalot
- Biosciences Institute, Vascular Biology and Medicine Theme, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Olivier Muller
- Department of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - François Mach
- Department of Cardiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Norbert Frey
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Heidelberg/Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Daniel Duerschmied
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Heidelberg/Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology, Hemostaseology and Medical Intensive Care, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
- European Center for Angioscience, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Harald F. Langer
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Heidelberg/Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology, Hemostaseology and Medical Intensive Care, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
- European Center for Angioscience, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Hugo Katus
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Heidelberg/Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Marco Roffi
- Department of Cardiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Giovanni G. Camici
- Center for Molecular Cardiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christian Mueller
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Basel and University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Evangelos Giannitsis
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ioakim Spyridopoulos
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Vascular Biology and Medicine Theme, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- Department of Cardiology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas F. Lüscher
- Center for Molecular Cardiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals and Imperial College and Kings College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Konstantinos Stellos
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Heidelberg/Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology, Hemostaseology and Medical Intensive Care, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
- Department of Cardiovascular Research, European Center for Angioscience, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
- Biosciences Institute, Vascular Biology and Medicine Theme, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Kimon Stamatelopoulos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Vascular Biology and Medicine Theme, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Clinical Manifestation of Cardiac Rupture in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Early Versus Late Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Glob Heart 2022; 17:69. [PMID: 36199564 PMCID: PMC9524297 DOI: 10.5334/gh.1155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Cardiac rupture is one of the fatal complications of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) in the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) era. The present study aims to identify risk factors of cardiac rupture among patients suffering from STEMI, treated with early and late PPCI. Methods: This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study involving STEMI patients with cardiac rupture (CR group), matched with STEMI patients without CR (control group) in a 1:5 ratio. They were divided into the early (≤ 6 h) and the late (> 6 h) PCI groups. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized to identify risk factors for cardiac rupture. Results: Seventy-four patients in the CR and 370 in the control group were included. Multivariable regression identified lateral infarction (OR = 11.89, 95% CI 2.22–63.81, p < 0.01) in the early PCI phase as a significant risk factor for cardiac rupture. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grade 0-1 (early PCI: OR = 4.16, 95% CI 1.33-13.0, p = 0.01; late PCI: OR = 4.46, 95% CI 1.59–12.54, p < 0.01) was a risk factor for both early and late PCI groups. In contrast, TIMI grade 2 was associated with a higher rupture risk within the late (OR = 16.87, 95% CI 3.83–74.19, p < 0.001) but not for the early (OR = 5.44, 95% CI 0.76–39.07, p = 0.09) PCI groups. STEMI combined with Killip IV was associated with a higher rupture risk for the late PCI group (OR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.03–1.99, p = 0.04). Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) was protective against cardiac rupture within early PPCI (OR = 0.18, 95% CI 0.04–0.89, p = 0.04). In contrast, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were associated with lower rupture risks in both the early and late groups (early PCI: OR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.17–0.87, p = 0.02; late PCI: OR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.15–0.75, p < 0.01). Conclusions: No reflow or slow blood flow is associated with a higher risk of cardiac rupture in early and late PCI patients. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors are beneficial in preventing heart rupture, and the use of IABP in early PPCI is also helpful in preventing heart rupture.
Collapse
|
3
|
Yildiz BS, Cetin N, Gunduz R, Bilge A, Ozgur S, Orman MN. Effect of Coronary Thrombus Aspiration in Non ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients on Three-Year Survival- Does it add any Benefit? Angiology 2022; 73:565-578. [PMID: 35104154 DOI: 10.1177/00033197211053404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
We assessed the effect of thrombus aspiration (TA) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on in-hospital and 3-year mortality in consecutive non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (n = 189) and unstable angina pectoris (n = 148) patients (n = 337) between 2011 and 2016. In total, 153 patients (45.4%) underwent TA. The number of patients with postoperative thrombolysis in terms of myocardial infarction grade 3 blood flow (P < .001) and myocardial blush grade 3 (P < .001) were significantly higher in all TA groups. At 6-, 12- and 24-month post-PCI, the mean left ventricular ejection fraction was significantly higher in the all TA groups versus the stand alone PCI group (P < .001). Thrombus aspiration was associated with a significant improvement both in epicardial flow, myocardial perfusion and left ventricular ejection fraction. Thrombus aspiration during PCI in all acute coronary syndrome (except ST segment elevation) patients was associated with better survival compared with stand alone PCI group at 3-year follow-up (P = .019).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bekir S Yildiz
- Department of Cardiology, Celal Bayar University Faculty of Medicine, Manisa, Turkey
| | - Nurullah Cetin
- Department of Cardiology, Celal Bayar University Faculty of Medicine, Manisa, Turkey
| | - Ramazan Gunduz
- Department of Cardiology, Manisa City Hospital, Manisa, Turkey
| | - Adnan Bilge
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Celal Bayar University Faculty of Medicine, Manisa, Turkey
| | - Su Ozgur
- Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Mehmet N Orman
- Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shammas NW, Radaideh Q, Shammas WJ, Daher GE, Rachwan RJ, Radaideh Y. The role of precise imaging with intravascular ultrasound in coronary and peripheral interventions. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2019; 15:283-290. [PMID: 31496717 PMCID: PMC6689566 DOI: 10.2147/vhrm.s210928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2019] [Accepted: 07/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Angiography remains a widely utilized imaging modality during vascular procedures. Angiography, however, has its limitations by underestimating the true vessel size, plaque morphology, presence of calcium and thrombus, plaque vulnerability, true lesion length, stent expansion and apposition, residual narrowing post intervention and the presence or absence of dissections. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has emerged as an important adjunctive modality to angiography. IVUS offers precise imaging of the vessel size, plaque morphology and the presence of dissections and guides interventional procedures including stent sizing, assessing residual narrowing and stent apposition and expansion. IVUS-guided treatment has shown to yield superior outcomes when compared to angiography-only guided therapy. The cost-effectiveness of the routine use of IVUS during vascular procedures needs to be further studied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Qais Radaideh
- Midwest Cardiovascular Research Foundation , Davenport, IA, USA
| | - W John Shammas
- Midwest Cardiovascular Research Foundation , Davenport, IA, USA
| | - Ghassan E Daher
- Midwest Cardiovascular Research Foundation , Davenport, IA, USA
| | | | - Yazan Radaideh
- Midwest Cardiovascular Research Foundation , Davenport, IA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Manolis AS. Is Atherothromboaspiration a Possible Solution for the Prevention of No-Reflow Phenomenon in Acute Coronary Syndromes? Single Centre Experience and Review of the Literature. Curr Vasc Pharmacol 2019; 17:164-179. [DOI: 10.2174/1570161116666180101150956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2017] [Revised: 11/23/2017] [Accepted: 11/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Background: Intracoronary thrombus in acute Myocardial Infarction (MI) confers higher
rates of no-reflow with attendant adverse consequences. Earlier Randomized-Controlled-Trials (RCTs)
of routine thromboaspiration during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) indicated a clinical benefit,
but more recent RCTs were negative. However, data of selective use of this adjunctive approach
remain scarce.
</P><P>
Objective: The aim of this single-centre prospective study was to report the results of selective thromboaspiration
during PCI in patients with intracoronary thrombi, and also to provide an extensive literature
review on current status of thromboaspiration.
</P><P>
Methods: The study included 90 patients (77 men; aged 59.3±12.7 years) presenting with acute MI (STElevation
MI (STEMI) in 74, non-STEMI in 16) who had intracoronary thrombi and were submitted to
thromboaspiration.
</P><P>
Results: Total (n=67) or subtotal (n=18) vessel occlusions were present in 85 (94%) patients. Thromboaspiration
and subsequent PCI were successful in 89/90 (98.9%) patients, with coronary stenting in 86
(96.6%). In 4 patients with residual thrombus, a mesh-covered stent was implanted. IIb/IIIa-inhibitors
were administered in 57 (63.3%) patients. No-reflow occurred in only 1 (1.1%) patient. The postprocedural
course was uneventful. Review of the literature revealed several early observational and
RCTs and meta-analyses favouring manual, not mechanical, thrombectomy. However, newer RCTs and
meta-analyses significantly curtailed the initial enthusiasm for the clinical benefits of routine use of
thromboaspiration.
</P><P>
Conclusion: Selective thromboaspiration for angiographically visible thrombi in MI patients undergoing
PCI, as an adjunct to mechanical reperfusion and to IIb/IIIa-inhibitors, may be an option since this
manoeuvre may improve procedural and clinical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonis S. Manolis
- Third Department of Cardiology, Athens University School of Medicine, Sotiria Hospital, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vrints CJM. Improving diagnosis, reperfusion therapy and secondary prevention in acute myocardial infarction. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE 2018; 7:495-496. [DOI: 10.1177/2048872618804940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
|
7
|
Klingenberg R, Aghlmandi S, Liebetrau C, Räber L, Gencer B, Nanchen D, Carballo D, Akhmedov A, Montecucco F, Zoller S, Brokopp C, Heg D, Jüni P, Marti Soler H, Marques-Vidal PM, Vollenweider P, Dörr O, Rodondi N, Mach F, Windecker S, Landmesser U, von Eckardstein A, Hamm CW, Matter CM, Lüscher TF. Cysteine-rich angiogenic inducer 61 (Cyr61): a novel soluble biomarker of acute myocardial injury improves risk stratification after acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 2018; 38:3493-3502. [PMID: 29155984 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2017] [Accepted: 10/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims We aimed to identify a novel biomarker involved in the early events leading to an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and evaluate its role in diagnosis and risk stratification. Methods and results Biomarker identification was based on gene expression profiling. In coronary thrombi of ACS patients, cysteine-rich angiogenic inducer 61 (Cyr61, CCN1) gene transcripts were highly up-regulated compared with peripheral mononuclear cells. In a murine ischaemia-reperfusion model (I/R), myocardial Cyr61 expression was markedly increased compared with the controls. Cyr61 levels were determined in human serum using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Cohorts of ACS (n = 2168) referred for coronary angiography, stable coronary artery disease (CAD) (n = 53), and hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) patients (n = 15) served to identify and evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic performance of the biomarker. Cyr61 was markedly elevated in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients compared with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction/unstable angina or stable CAD patients, irrespective of whether coronary thrombi were present. Cyr61 was rapidly released after occlusion of a septal branch in HOCM patients undergoing transcoronary ablation of septal hypertrophy. Cyr61 improved risk stratification for all-cause mortality when added to the reference GRACE risk score at 30 days (C-statistic 0.88 to 0.89, P = 0.001) and 1 year (C-statistic 0.77 to 0.80, P < 0.001) comparable to high-sensitivity troponin T (30 days: 0.88 to 0.89, P < 0.001; 1 year: 0.77 to 0.79, P < 0.001). Similar results were obtained for the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or myocardial infarction. Conversely, in a population-based case-control cohort (n = 362), Cyr61 was not associated with adverse outcome. Conclusion Cyr61 is a novel early biomarker reflecting myocardial injury that improves risk stratification in ACS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roland Klingenberg
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital of Zurich and Center for Molecular Cardiology, University of Zurich, Rämistr. 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland and Wagistr. 12, CH-8952 Schlieren, Switzerland.,Department of Cardiology, Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Center, Kerckhoff-Klinik, Benekestr. 2-8, D-61231 Bad Nauheim, Germany.,DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Rhine-Main, Benekestr. 2-8, D-61231 Bad Nauheim, Germany
| | - Soheila Aghlmandi
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Finkenhubelweg 11, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland.,CTU Bern, University of Bern, Finkenhubelweg 11, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland.,Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University Hospital of Basel, Spitalstr. 12, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Liebetrau
- Department of Cardiology, Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Center, Kerckhoff-Klinik, Benekestr. 2-8, D-61231 Bad Nauheim, Germany.,DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Rhine-Main, Benekestr. 2-8, D-61231 Bad Nauheim, Germany
| | - Lorenz Räber
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, University Hospital of Bern, Freiburgstr. 18, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Baris Gencer
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, University Hospital of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, CH-1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland
| | - David Nanchen
- Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 44, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - David Carballo
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, University Hospital of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, CH-1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland
| | - Alexander Akhmedov
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital of Zurich and Center for Molecular Cardiology, University of Zurich, Rämistr. 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland and Wagistr. 12, CH-8952 Schlieren, Switzerland
| | - Fabrizio Montecucco
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, University Hospital of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, CH-1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland.,First Clinic of Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, 6, Viale Benedetto XV, IT-16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Stefan Zoller
- Bioinformatics, Genetic Diversity Center, Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Universitätsstr. 16, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Chad Brokopp
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Regenerative Medicine Center, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Zurich, Wagistr. 12, CH-8952 Schlieren, Switzerland
| | - Dik Heg
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Finkenhubelweg 11, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland.,CTU Bern, University of Bern, Finkenhubelweg 11, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Peter Jüni
- Applied Health Research Centre (AHRC), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, 209 Victoria St, Toronto, ON M5B 1T8, Canada
| | - Helena Marti Soler
- Department of General Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Pedro-Manuel Marques-Vidal
- Department of General Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Peter Vollenweider
- Department of General Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Oliver Dörr
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Giessen, Klinikstr. 33; D-35392 Giessen, Germany
| | - Nicolas Rodondi
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Gesellschaftsstr. 49, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland.,Department of General Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Bern, Freiburgstr. 18, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - François Mach
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, University Hospital of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, CH-1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland
| | - Stephan Windecker
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, University Hospital of Bern, Freiburgstr. 18, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ulf Landmesser
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital of Zurich and Center for Molecular Cardiology, University of Zurich, Rämistr. 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland and Wagistr. 12, CH-8952 Schlieren, Switzerland.,Department of Cardiology, Charité Campus Benjamin-Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, D-12200 Berlin, Germany
| | - Arnold von Eckardstein
- Institute of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital of Zurich, Rämistr. 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christian W Hamm
- Department of Cardiology, Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Center, Kerckhoff-Klinik, Benekestr. 2-8, D-61231 Bad Nauheim, Germany.,DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Rhine-Main, Benekestr. 2-8, D-61231 Bad Nauheim, Germany.,Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Giessen, Klinikstr. 33; D-35392 Giessen, Germany
| | - Christian M Matter
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital of Zurich and Center for Molecular Cardiology, University of Zurich, Rämistr. 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland and Wagistr. 12, CH-8952 Schlieren, Switzerland
| | - Thomas F Lüscher
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital of Zurich and Center for Molecular Cardiology, University of Zurich, Rämistr. 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland and Wagistr. 12, CH-8952 Schlieren, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|