Prognostic impact of percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: A report from SWEDEHEART

Multi-domain lifestyle intervention in older adults after myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the PIpELINe randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Traditional cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is effective in improving physical performance and prognosis after myocardial infarction (MI). Anyway, it is not consistently recommended to older adults, and its attendance rate is low. Previous studies suggested that alternative, early and tailored exercise interventions are feasible and effective in improving physical performance in older MI patients. Anyway, the demonstration that they are associated also with a significant reduction of hard endpoints is lacking.

AIM

To describe rationale and design of the "Physical activity Intervention in Elderly patients with myocardial Infarction" (PIpELINe) trial.

METHODS

The PIpELINe trial is a prospective, randomized, multicentre study with a blinded adjudicated evaluation of the outcomes. Patients aged ≥ 65 years, admitted to hospital for MI and with a low physical performance one month after discharge, as defined as short physical performance battery (SPPB) value between 4 and 9, will be randomized to a multi-domain lifestyle intervention (including dietary counselling, strict management of cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors, and exercise training) or health education. The primary endpoint is the one-year occurrence of the composite of cardiovascular death or re-hospitalization for cardiovascular causes.

RESULTS

The recruitment started in March 2020. The estimated sample size is 456 patients. The conclusion of the enrolment is planned for mid-2023. The primary endpoint analysis will be available for the end of 2024.

CONCLUSIONS

The PIpELINe trial will show if a multi-domain lifestyle intervention is able to reduce adverse events in older patients with reduced physical performance after hospitalization for MI.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04183465.

Association of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide with mortality in elderly (≥80 years) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the role of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in the prognostication of patients ≥80 years of age undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

BACKGROUND

Elderly patients with coronary artery disease in need of PCI represent a growing patient population. Advanced risk prediction in this frail and comorbid patient population is important.

METHODS

A total of 460 consecutive patients ≥80 years of age undergoing PCI for acute (ACS) or chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) at the University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland, between January 2016 and December 2018 and with available baseline NT-proBNP levels were included in the analysis. Patients were stratified according to baseline NT-proBNP levels. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at a median follow-up of 33 (interquartile range: 3-392) days.

RESULTS

Median baseline NT-proBNP levels were 1411 (457-3984) ng/L. All-cause mortality was 7.8% in the lowest and 27.8% in the highest NT-proBNP quartile group (p < 0.001). In patients with ACS, all-cause mortality was 4.8% and 30.4% in the lowest and the highest NT-proBNP quartile (p < 0.001), and corresponding rates in patients with CCS were 11.1% and 22.2% (p = 0.38). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, baseline NT-proBNP levels were independently associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.00, 95% confidence interval: 1.00-1.00, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline NT-proBNP levels were identified as independent predictor of mortality in elderly (≥80 years) patients undergoing PCI. Hence, baseline NT-proBNP allows for the identification of a high-risk elderly patient subset.

Physiology-guided revascularization versus optimal medical therapy of nonculprit lesions in elderly patients with myocardial infarction: Rationale and design of the FIRE trial

BACKGROUND

Myocardial infarction (MI) in elderly patients is associated with unfavorable prognosis, and it is becoming an increasingly prevalent condition. The prognosis of elderly patients is equally impaired in ST-segment elevation (STE) or non-STE (NSTE), and it is markedly worsened by the common presence of multivessel disease (MVD). Given the limited evidence available for elderly patients, it has not yet been established whether, as for younger patients, a complete revascularization strategy in MI patients with MVD should be advocated. We present the design of a dedicated study that will address this research gap.

METHODS AND DESIGN

The FIRE trial is a prospective, randomized, international, multicenter, open-label study with blinded adjudicated evaluation of outcomes. Patients aged 75 years and older, with MI (either STE or NSTE), MVD at coronary artery angiography, and a clear culprit lesion will be randomized to culprit-only treatment or to physiology-guided complete revascularization. The primary end point will be the patient-oriented composite end point of all-cause death, any MI, any stroke, and any revascularization at 1 year. The key secondary end point will be the composite of cardiovascular death and MI. Quality of life and physical performance will be evaluated as well. All components of the primary and key secondary outcome will be tested also at 3 and 5 years. The sample size for the study is 1,400 patients.

IMPLICATIONS

The FIRE trial will provide evidence on whether a specific revascularization strategy should be applied to elderly patients presenting MI and MVD to improve their clinical outcomes.