Prognostic relevance of pericardial effusion in STEMI patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a 10-year single-centre experience

Implantable-cardioverter-defibrillator after ST-elevation myocardial infarction: when and how frequently is it implanted and what is the rate of appropriate interventions? Insight from Trieste registry

BACKGROUND

There are limited data on implantable-cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). Therefore, we evaluated when and how frequently an ICD is implanted after pPCI, the rate of appropriate ICD interventions, and predictors of ICD implantation.

METHODS

We analyzed STEMI patients treated with pPCI at the University Hospital of Trieste, Italy, between January 2010 and December 2019. We cross-matched patients' data with those present in the Trieste ICD registry.

RESULTS

Among 1805 consecutive patients treated with pPCI, 3.6% underwent ICD implantation during a median follow-up of 6.7 [interquartile range (IQR) 4.3-9.2] years. At 12 months, the mean number of ICD implantations was 2.3/100 patients [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.7-3.1] and remained stable over time (at 24 months: 2.5/100 patients, 95% CI 2.0-3.5 and at 36 months: 2.6/100 patients, 95% CI 2.3-3.8); 83.1% of ICDs were implanted for primary prevention, and more than half (55%) were implanted in patients with ejection fraction more than 35% at the moment of STEMI discharge. The rate of appropriate ICD interventions was 16.9% at a median follow-up of 5.7 years (IQR 3.3-8.3 years) after ICD implantation. At 12 months, the mean number of appropriate ICD interventions was 5/100 patients and 7/100 patients after 24 months. In patients with ejection fraction more than 35% at STEMI discharge (median ejection fraction 43%; IQR 40-48), independent predictors of ICD implantation were male sex, anterior STEMI and troponin peak more than 100 000 ng/dl.

CONCLUSION

The rate of ICD implantations after pPCI is low; however, the rate of appropriate ICD interventions is high. A relevant subgroup of patients received ICD implantations at follow-up despite a nonsevere ejection fraction at discharge after STEMI. Among these patients, those with high troponin release deserve strict follow-up and full optimal medical treatment.

[Cardiac ruptures in acute myocardial infarction]

Presented in the article are the generalized data of the Russian and foreign literature addressing the currently important problem of myocardial ruptures as one of the most dangerous complications of infarction, also analysing the results of clinical studies on interconnection of heart ruptures with systemic thrombolytic therapy and with a percutaneous coronary intervention. This is followed by describing the mechanisms that may lead to myocardial rupture during thrombolytic therapy and surgical endovascular treatment, underlying the necessity of pharmacological pre- and post-conditioning for prevention of reperfusion myocardial lesions. The article also touches upon the clinical and instrumental diagnosis of myocardial ruptures, as well as approaches to surgical treatment depending on the type of rupture and necessity of myocardial revascularization.

Long-Term Prognostic Significance of High-Sensitive Troponin I Increase during Hospital Stay in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries

Background and Objectives: A topic already widely investigated is the negative prognostic value regarding the extent of high sensitive troponin I (hs-TnI) increases among patients with myocardial infarction (MI) and obstructive coronary atherosclerosis compared to a group of patients with MI and non-obstructive coronary atherosclerosis (MINOCA). Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value concerning the extent of hs-TnI increase on clinical outcomes among patients with a MINOCA working diagnosis. Materials and Methods: We selected 337 consecutive patients admitted to hospital with a working diagnosis of MINOCA. The patients were divided in three groups according to the extent of hs-TnI increase during hospitalization (increase ≤5-times above the limit of the upper norm, >5 and ≤20-times, and >20-times). The study endpoints included all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE; cerebral stroke and transient ischemic attacks, MI, coronary artery revascularization, either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting and all-cause mortality). Results: During the mean follow-up period of 516.1 ± 239.8 days, using Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis, significantly higher mortality rates were demonstrated among patients from the group with the greatest hs-TnI increase compared to the remaining groups (p = 0.01) and borderline values for MACCE (p = 0.053). Multivariable cox regression analysis did not confirm hs-TnI among factors related to increased MACCE or all-cause mortality rates. Conclusion: While a relationship between clinical outcomes and the extent of the hs-TnI increase among patients with a MINOCA working diagnosis remains, it does not seem to be not as strong as it is in patients with obstructive coronary atherosclerosis.