Vertebral body segmentation with GrowCut: Initial experience, workflow and practical application

Focal osteoporosis defect is associated with vertebral compression fracture prevalence in a bone mineral density-independent manner

Introduction

Focal osteoporosis defect has shown a high association with the bone fragility and osteoporotic fracture prevalence. However, no routine computed tomography (CT)‐based vertebral focal osteoporosis defect measurement and its association with vertebral compression fracture (VCF) were discussed yet. This study aimed to develop a routine CT‐based measurement method for focal osteoporosis defect quantification, and to assess its association with the VCF prevalence.

Materials and Methods

A total of 205 cases who underwent routine CT scanning, were retrospectively reviewed and enrolled into either the VCF or the control group. The focal bone mineral content loss (focal BMC loss), measured as the cumulated demineralization within bone void space, was proposed for focal osteoporosis defect quantification. Its scan‐rescan reproducibility and its correlation with trabecular bone mineral density (BMD) and apparent microarchitecture parameters were evaluated. The association between focal BMC loss and the prevalence of VCF was studied by logistic regression.

Results

The measurement of focal BMC loss showed high reproducibility (RMSSD = 0.011 mm, LSC = 0.030 mm, ICC = 0.97), and good correlation with focal bone volume fraction (r = 0.79, P < 0.001), trabecular bone separation (r = 0.76, P < 0.001), but poor correlation with trabecular BMD (r = 0.37, P < 0.001). The focal BMC loss was significantly higher in the fracture group than the control (1.03 ± 0.13 vs. 0.93 ± 0.11 mm; P < 0.001), and was associated with prevalent VCF (1.87, 95% CI = 1.31–2.65, P < 0.001) independent of trabecular BMD level.

Discussion

As a surrogate measure of focal osteoporosis defect, focal BMC Loss independently associated with the VCF prevalence. It suggests that focal osteoporosis defect is a common manifestation that positively contributed to compression fracture risk and can be quantified with routine CT using focal BMC Loss.

Geometric and volumetric relationship between human lumbar vertebrae and "Black-bone" MRI-based models

BACKGROUND

This study will examine the differences between human lumbar vertebrae, three-dimensional (3D) scans of these bones, 3D models based on 'Black-bone' magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, and 3D-printed models.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

3D mesh models were created from the "Black-bone" MRI data from two cadaveric human spines, and then 3D printed. Four models were analysed and compared: anatomic bones, 3D-scanned models, MRI models and 3D-printed models.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between when comparing the average of all measurements between all model types (p = 0.81). The mean dice coefficient was 0.91 (SD 0.016) and the mean Hausdorff distance was 0.37 mm (SD 0.04 mm) when comparing the MRI model to the 3D-scanned model. The mean volumes for the MRI model and the 3D scanned model were 10.42 and 10.04 ml (p = 0.085), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The 'Black-bone' MRI could be a valid radiation-free alternative to computed tomography for the 3D printing of lumbar spinal biomodels.