The clinical and cost implications of failed endoscopic hemostasis in gastroduodenal ulcer bleeding

Iatrogenic injury of duodenum: malady of a therapeutic misadventure

Endoscopic procedures are the front-runner of the management of bleeding duodenal ulcer. Rarely, surgical intervention is sought for acute bleeding, not amenable to endoscopic procedures. Oversewing of the gastroduodenal artery at ulcer crater by transduodenal approach is the most acceptable and recommended method of treatment. We describe a case of an intraoperative duodenal injury that occurred during an attempt to oversew the gastroduodenal artery after a duodenotomy, leading to an unsatisfactory and meagre duodenal stump. This case will highlight the intraoperative turmoil, postoperative complications and management of a series of anticipated but unfortunate events that have rendered us wiser in terms of surgical management of a bleeding duodenal ulcer.

Use of Doppler Probe in Nonvariceal Upper-Gastrointestinal Bleeding Is Less Costly and More Effective Than Standard of Care

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding is a common emergency and rebleeding is associated with an increased risk of death. Proper assessment of high-risk lesions and appropriate endoscopic hemostasis are required for the best outcomes. The endoscopic Doppler probe examination (DPE) allows for a more complete assessment of the stigmata of hemorrhage, providing better evaluation of the need for endoscopic hemostasis and determination of its completeness. We aimed to evaluate whether use of the DPE provides an additional advantage in cost and effectiveness compared with traditional endoscopic visual assessment (TEA) of high-risk stigmata in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

METHODS

We drew a decision tree representing the choice between DPE and TEA approaches for patients undergoing an index endoscopy for active nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Clinical probabilities were retrieved from randomized controlled trial data. Costs were expressed in 2017 US dollars. A third-party payer perspective was adopted. We performed deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. The adopted time horizon was 30 days after the index endoscopy.

RESULTS

We found that DPE is a dominant strategy over the TEA, in that DPE is more efficacious (92.6% of patients avoiding rebleeding vs 78.6% for TEA) and less expensive ($8502 vs $9104 for TEA). The economic dominance of DPE over TEA was robust to sensitivity analyses across all assumptions of the model when varied among ranges spanning 30% of their respective baseline values.

CONCLUSIONS

In a cost-effectiveness analysis, we found DPE to be an economically dominant strategy to TEA (the traditional approach) in the management of high-risk lesions in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. DPE was less costly and more effective.

Over-the-scope clip in peptic ulcer bleeding: clinical success in primary and secondary treatment and factors associated with treatment failure

Background and study aims  It is unclear if the clinical success rate of the over-the-scope-clip (OTSC) in peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB) is comparable when it is used in the first- or in the second-line of treatment. Patients and methods  Data on endoscopic treatment (first- vs. second-line) in PUB with OTSC and clinical data were analyzed. The primary outcome was the clinical success of hemostasis, defined as the absence of recurrent bleeding or further intervention. Secondary outcomes were factors associated with OTSC failure. Results  From April 2014 to March 2018, 100 patients (age 72 [20 - 98] y, female 36 %) with PUB in the stomach or the duodenum were treated endoscopically with the OTSC. The OTSC was used as a first-line procedure (primary-OTSC) in 66 pts. Successful hemostasis could be achieved in 90.9 %. After failure of an initial endoscopic treatment, 34 patients were treated with the OTSC (secondary-OTSC) and the treatment was successful in 94.1 %. Recurrent bleeding occurred in n = 10 for primary-OTSC (16.7 %) and in n = 7 pts in the secondary-OTSC (21.9 %) ( P  = 0.81). Clinical success in the primary-OTSC was 75.8 % and 73.5 % in the secondary-OTSC respectively. Conclusions  The OTSC has a high rate of initial bleeding control in first- and second line treatment of PUB. OTSC failure occurs more often in the duodenum than in the stomach and results in longer intensive care unit stay, higher amount of transfusions, and a higher reimbursement per case.