Fecal incontinence and parity in the Dutch population: A cross-sectional analysis

Global Prevalence of Fecal Incontinence in Community-Dwelling Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Fecal incontinence (FI) can considerably impair quality of life. Through a systematic review and meta-analysis, we sought to determine the global prevalence and geographic distribution of FI and to characterize its relationship with sex and age.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases to identify population-based surveys of the prevalence of FI.

RESULTS

Of the 5175 articles identified, the final analysis included 80 studies; the median response rate was 66% (interquartile range [IQR], 54%-74%). Among 548,316 individuals, the pooled global prevalence of FI was 8.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.8%-9.2%); by Rome criteria, it was 5.4% (95% CI, 3.1%-7.7%). FI prevalence was greater for persons aged 60 years and older (9.3%; 95% CI, 6.6%-12.0%) compared with younger persons (4.9%; 95% CI, 2.9%-6.9%) (odds ratio [OR], 1.75; 95% CI, 1.39-2.20), and it was more prevalent among women (9.1%; 95% CI, 7.6%-10.6%) than men (7.4%; 95% CI, 6.0%-8.8%]) (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.06-1.28). The prevalence was highest in Australia and Oceania, followed by North America, Asia, and Europe, but prevalence could not be estimated in Africa and the Middle East. The risk of bias was low, moderate, and high for 19 (24%), 46 (57%), and 15 (19%) studies, respectively. Exclusion of studies with high risk of bias did not affect the prevalence of FI or heterogeneity. In the meta-regression, the high study heterogeneity (I2 = 99.61%) was partly explained by age.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 1 in 12 adults worldwide have FI. The prevalence is greater among women and older people.

Anal and urinary incontinence in nulliparous women - Prevalence and associated risk factors

OBJECTIVE

To establish the prevalence and risk factors of urinary and anal incontinence in nulliparous women.

STUDY DESIGN

Thirty-one catholic convents were sent a validated questionnaire to determine the prevalence and severity of urinary incontinence, and a similarly structured questionnaire to assess anal incontinence. Multivariable regression models were used to determine independent risk factors associated with the likelihood of urinary incontinence or anal incontinence.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Urine/faecal/flatal incontinence and symptom severity.

RESULTS

Of 202 nuns, 167 (83%) returned the questionnaire. Twenty-two women were excluded due to history of childbirth. Of 145 nulliparous women, 56.2% reported urinary incontinence and 53.8% reported anal incontinence. Women aged 66-76 years had significantly increased odds of experiencing urinary incontinence in comparison to women aged 40-65 years: OR: 2.35 (95% CI: 1.02-5.45) (p = 0.04). The risk of urinary incontinence was increased in women with a body mass index ≥ 30 in comparison to those with a body mass index < 19: OR: 6.25 (95% CI: 1.03-38.08) (p = 0.04). With regards to anal incontinence, although none of the differences with age and body mass index groups reached statistical significance, there was a trend towards women in higher body mass index groups having an increased prevalence of anal incontinence. Current/previous hormonal replacement therapy was also associated with significantly increased odds of experiencing urinary incontinence: OR: 2.53 (95% CI: 1.01-6.36), (p = 0.04). However, when adjusting for age and body mass index, there was no significant association with urinary incontinence.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights that while childbirth is an important risk factor, urinary incontinence and anal incontinence also occur in over 50% of nulliparous women. Additional studies are required to identify other risk factors that may be associated with incontinence in this population.

Strong agreement between interview-obtained and self-administered Wexner and St. Mark's scores using a single questionnaire

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

St Mark's incontinence score (SMIS) and the Wexner score have been constructed and validated as interview-based scoring systems. We developed a single questionnaire from which a separate SMIS or Wexner score could be derived. This study aimed to demonstrate the level of agreement between self-administered (sSMIS and sWexner) and interview-based (iSMIS and iWexner) scores using this questionnaire.

METHODS

One hundred five consecutive patients (30 male) seen in the incontinence outpatient clinics at the Østfold Hospital Trust, Sarpsborg, and University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, completed the self-administered incontinence questionnaire prior to the appointment. Following clinical investigation, the patients were interviewed about their symptoms according to the SMIS and Wexner scores, with the interviewers blinded to the results from self-reported questionnaire. Agreement between total scores and between subscores of the various items were determined using interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and kappa statistics, respectively.

RESULTS

The self-administered questionnaire was incomplete in six cases (5.7%) and the interview-based was incomplete in two cases. Agreement was almost perfect between the iSMIS and sSMIS and between the iWexner score and sWexner score (ICC 0.90 and 0.92, respectively). Agreement was substantial to almost perfect for all items in both scoring systems, with kappa values ranging from 0.64-0.94. Mean iSMIS was 9.48 versus 9.53 for sSMIS (p = 0.90) and 8.26 versus 8.44 for the iWexner and sWexner score, respectively (p = 0.42).

CONCLUSION

The SMIS and Wexner scores can be completed by the patients using a single questionnaire, and the derived SMIS and Wexner scores are highly consistent with scores obtained by interview.

Subtypes and symptoms of fecal incontinence in the Dutch population: a cross-sectional study

PURPOSE

To study the distribution of subtypes and symptoms of fecal incontinence in the general Dutch population.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional study in a representative sample of the general Dutch population. All respondents (N = 1259) completed the Groningen Defecation and Fecal Continence questionnaire. We assigned the respondents to a so-called healthy subgroup (n = 1008) and a comorbidity subgroup (n = 251). The latter subgroup comprised the respondents who reportedly suffered from chronic diseases and who had undergone surgery known to influence fecal continence. We defined fecal incontinence according to the Rome IV criteria.

RESULTS

The combination of urge fecal incontinence and soiling was the most frequent form of fecal incontinence in the total study group, the "healthy" subgroup, and the comorbidity subgroup (49.0, 47.3, and 51.5%). Passive fecal incontinence was the least frequent form of fecal incontinence in all three groups (4.0, 5.4, and 2.2%). The prevalence and severity of fecal incontinence was significantly higher in the comorbidity subgroup than in the "healthy" subgroup. Only in the comorbidity subgroup did the fecally incontinent respondents feel urge sensation significantly less often before defecating than their fecally continent counterparts (16.5 versus 48.8%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Urge fecal incontinence combined with soiling is commonest in the general Dutch population. Chronic diseases and bowel and pelvic surgery both increase and aggravate fecal incontinence.