Real-world management of juvenile autoimmune liver disease

A reasoned approach to the treatment of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic inflammatory liver disease affecting all ages, characterised by elevated transaminase and immunoglobulin G levels, positive autoantibodies, interface hepatitis on histology and good response to immunosuppressive treatment. If untreated, it has a poor prognosis. The aim of this review is to analyse AIH therapeutic interventions with reference to our knowledge of the pathogenesis of AIH. Standard treatment, based on steroids and azathioprine, leads to disease remission in 80-90% of patients. Alternative first-line treatment with budesonide is effective in adults, but less so in the juvenile form of AIH; first-line treatment with ciclosporin does not provide convincing advantages compared to standard treatment. Second-line treatments are needed for patients not responding or intolerant to first-line standard management. Mycophenolate mofetil is the most widely used second-line drug, and has good efficacy particularly for patients intolerant to azathioprine, but is teratogenic. Only few and heterogeneous data on calcineurin inhibitors and m-TOR inhibitors are available. Biologicals, including anti-tumour necrosis factor- α and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, have given ambivalent results and may have severe side-effects. Clinical trials with new therapeutic options aiming at targeting B lymphocytes and proinflammatory cytokines, or expanding regulatory T cells to restore tolerance are ongoing.

Profiling the patient with autoimmune hepatitis on calcineurin inhibitors: a real-world-experience

OBJECTIVE

Therapy for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) consists of steroid induction therapy, followed by maintenance therapy with azathioprine. However, up to 20% of patients experience either insufficient response or intolerance on first-line therapy. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are frequently used when first-line therapy fails. Although a number of studies report on efficacy, less is known on the patient trajectory before switch to CNIs. Our aim was to describe the road toward CNI therapy in AIH patients.

METHODS

Patients with an AIH diagnosis who used CNIs as either second- or third-line treatment were included in the study. Reason for switch to CNI was assessed as either an insufficient response or intolerance to prior therapy. Efficacy was assessed by normalization of transaminases at last moment of follow-up.

RESULTS

Final analysis included 20 patients who were treated with CNIs. Ten patients were treated with tacrolimus and ten patients received cyclosporine. In patients who used CNI treatment as third-line therapy (n = 13), duration of first-line therapy was almost twice as long as duration of second-line therapy (2.58 years vs. 1.33 years; P = 0.67). Patients treated with tacrolimus had relatively high trough levels (7.6 ng/mL) and more (minor) adverse events. Fifty-five percent of patients had normalization of transaminases at last moment of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

CNI treatment in AIH as second- or third-line therapy is effective in ~50% of patients. The trajectory before switch varies considerably between patients.

Rapid Response to Treatment of Autoimmune Hepatitis Associated With Remission at 6 and 12 Months

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Changes in serum levels of transaminases immediately after initiation of treatment for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) might be associated with biochemical markers of remission and liver-related events. We assessed the outcomes of patients with vs without rapid response to treatment of AIH in a large international cohort.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study, collecting data from 2 independent cohorts of adults with AIH from 12 centers in 7 countries in Europe. We collected information on patient demographics; serologic, histologic, and biochemical analyses; and treatment. We used a receiver operating characteristic curve and Youden index to calculate the optimal percentage decrease in level of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) after 8 weeks of treatment that associated with normalization of transaminase levels after 26 weeks of treatment with predniso(lo)ne (primary outcome) in the first (discovery) cohort (n = 370). We evaluated the results in the second (validation) cohort (n = 370). Secondary outcomes were liver-related death or transplantation. We performed univariate and multivariable logistic and Cox regression with correction for confounders.

RESULTS

A significant decrease in level of AST after 8 weeks of treatment was significantly associated with normalization of transaminase levels at 26 and 52 weeks (P < .001); a decrease of more than 80% in level of AST was associated with optimal normalization. In both cohorts, rapid responders (≥80% decrease in level of AST after 8 weeks) were more likely to achieve normalization of transaminases at 26 and 52 weeks when compared to non-rapid responders. Rapid responders in the discovery cohort had lower risk of liver-related death or transplantation (adjusted hazard ratio 0.18; 95% CI 0.05-0.63; P = .007), although this was not confirmed in the validation cohort. Results from measurement of alanine aminotransferase did not differ significantly from those of AST for the primary outcome. Slow responders (without normalization of transaminases after 1 year) had the highest risk of liver transplantation or liver-related death.

CONCLUSIONS

In a retrospective study of patients with AIH, we found that a rapid response to treatment, based on level of AST after 8 weeks, associates with normalization of transaminase levels in the following year. Patients with a rapid response also have a lower risk of liver-related death or transplantation than patients without this rapid response.

The use of biologics in the treatment of autoimmune liver disease

Introduction: Autoimmune liver diseases include autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and juvenile autoimmune hepatitis (JAIH). The pathophysiologic features of each disease vary, but generally include presence of autoantibodies, cytokine abnormalities, and/or T and B cell autoreactivity.Areas covered: This article compares conventional therapy with newer biologics available for treatment of autoimmune liver diseases. Conventional therapy involves the use of immunosuppressive agents, or other treatment modalities for specific autoimmune liver diseases such as ursodeoxycholic acid and fibrates for PBC. Biologics were developed to target the production of autoantibodies by B cells, the presence of proinflammatory cytokines, adhesion molecules or T and B cell activation.Expert opinion: Despite the promise of biologics being able to target specific cellular and humoral pathways, results have been generally poor, and safety has not been as expected. Cases of autoimmune hepatitis have also developed with the use of these biologicals. Reasons for the lack of success of biologics in treating autoimmune liver disease has led to a reevaluation of our understanding of underlying pathogenesis, demonstrating that while our knowledge of the immunity has improved over the past two decades, it is far from complete.

Predniso(lo)ne Dosage and Chance of Remission in Patients With Autoimmune Hepatitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) commonly receive induction therapy with predniso(lo)ne followed by maintenance therapy with azathioprine. European Association for Study of the Liver clinical practice guidelines advise a predniso(lo)ne dose range of 0.50-1 mg/kg/day, which leaves room for practice variation. We performed a multicenter study to determine the efficacy of different dose ranges of predniso(lo)ne induction therapy in a large European cohort of patients with AIH.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study using a comparative effectiveness design. We collected data from 451 adults with AIH who began treatment from 1978 through 2017 at 9 centers in 5 European countries. We assigned patients to a high-dose group (initial predniso(lo)ne dose ≥0.50 mg/kg/day; n = 281) or a low-dose group (<0.50 mg/kg/day; n = 170). Logistic regression was performed to determine difference in outcomes between the groups. The primary outcome was normal serum levels of transaminases at 6 months after initiation of therapy.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in rates of normalization of transaminases between the high-dose predniso(lo)ne group and the low-dose group (70.5% vs 64.7%; P = .20). After multivariable logistic regression with correction for confounders, there was no difference in the likelihood of normalization of transaminases between the groups (odds ratio, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.78-1.87; P = .38). Patients given an initial high dose of predniso(lo)ne received more predniso(lo)ne over time than patients started on a lower dose (median doses over 6 months: 3780 mg vs 2573 mg) (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

In a retrospective study of patients with AIH in Europe, we found that the dose of predniso(lo)ne to induce remission in patients with AIH is less relevant than assumed. An initial predniso(lo)ne dose below 0.50 mg/kg/day substantially decreases unnecessary exposure to predniso(lo)ne in patients with AIH.

Position statement on access to care in rare liver diseases: advancements of the European reference network (ERN) RARE-LIVER

The European Reference Network for rare liver diseases (ERN RARE-LIVER) is a Europe-wide network of paediatric and adult hepatologists from expert centres in close collaboration with patient advocates from the various disease-areas covered in our ERN. The ERN is focused on providing more equitable care across Europe and creates a network of both medical specialists and patient experts in rare liver disease. This position paper summarizes the achievements of the first year and plots the route for the near future for ERN RARE-LIVER, as discussed during a strategy meeting that took place 27 and 28 February 2018 in Nijmegen, the Netherlands. ERN RARE-LIVER has established itself as a group with experts, hospitals and patients. One of the tools to improve communication is the clinical patient management system (CPMS) that allows access to expert consultation by European physicians confronted with a patient with rare liver disease. ERN RARE-LIVER will function as the platform to improve healthcare by initiating registries, foster research efforts and coordinate development of clinical guidelines in Europe.

Association Between Black Race and Presentation and Liver-Related Outcomes of Patients With Autoimmune Hepatitis

INTRODUCTION & AIMS

Small studies have found that black patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) present with more aggressive disease. We aimed to characterize the presentation and outcome in black and white patients with AIH.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study, collecting information from databases of patients with AIH attending the Institute of Liver studies at King's College Hospital, London (1971-October 2015, the Royal Free Hospital, London (1982 through December 2016) and the multicenter Dutch Autoimmune Hepatitis Study Group cohort (2006-August 2016). We identified 88 black patients with AIH and we compared their clinical characteristics and outcomes to 897 white patients with AIH.

RESULTS

Black patients presented at a younger age (median 38 years vs 45 years) (P = .007), had higher IgG levels (mean 31.0 mg/dL vs 27.5 mg/dL) (P = .04), but there were no significant differences between groups in auto-antibody profiles, International AIH Group scores, or sex distribution of disease. A higher proportion of black patients had systemic lupus erythematosus (10%) than white patients (2%) (P ≤ .001). There was no significant difference in proportions of patients with a response to standard therapy (86% for black patients vs 91% for white patients; P = .20) or in rate of relapse (57% vs 50%; P = .3). Despite this, black patients had an increased risk of liver transplantation and liver-related death (hazard ratio 2.4, 95% confidence interval, 1.4-4.0; P < .001). Overall mortality was similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In a comparison of black and white patients with AIH in Europe, we found that black patients present at a younger age, have higher levels of IgG levels, and a greater proportion have SLE. We also found black patients to have a greater risk of liver transplantation and liver-related mortality, indicating more aggressive disease.