Detection of serrated lesions in proximal colon by simulated sigmoidoscopy vs faecal immunochemical testing in a multicentre, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial

Sessile serrated polyp detection rates after fecal immunochemical test or multitarget stool DNA test: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and study aims Published studies report a higher adenoma detection rate (ADR) for FIT-DNA as compared with FIT. Data are less replete about the performance of stool-based tests for sessile serrated polyp (SSP) detection. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the performance of FIT and FIT-DNA testing for SSP detection rate (SSPDR) in patients undergoing colonoscopy for follow up of positive noninvasive tests. Methods A comprehensive literature search of multiple databases (until September 2022) was performed to identify studies reporting SSPDR in patients with positive FIT or FIT-DNA tests. The outcome was overall colonoscopy detection of any SSPs and advanced serrated polyps (ASP: SSP ≥ 10 mm and/or dysplasia). Results Included were 482,405 patients (52.4% females) with a mean age of 62.3 ± 4.4 years from 23 studies. The pooled SSPDR for all positive stool-based tests was 5.3% and higher for FIT-DNA (15.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.3-25.7) versus FIT (4.1%, 95% CI 3.0-5.6; P = 0.0002). The overall pooled ASP detection rate was 1.4% (95% CI 0.81-2.3) and higher for FIT-DNA (3.8 %, 95% CI 1.7-8.6) compared with FIT (0.71%, 95% CI 0.36-1.4; P <0.01). SSPDR with FIT-DNA was also significantly higher than FIT when the FIT cutoff was >10 ug/g and in FIT-positive patients in studies conducted in North America ( P <0.05). Conclusions FIT-DNA outperformed FIT in both SSP and ASP detection including FIT with a lower threshold cutoff of >10 ug/g. Further comparative studies are needed to assess the impact of our findings on colorectal cancer reduction.

Alternative diagnoses and demographics associated with a raised quantitative faecal immunochemical test in symptomatic patients

Background

The faecal immunochemical test (FIT) has proven utility for colorectal cancer detection in symptomatic patients. However, most patients with a raised faecal haemoglobin (f-Hb) do not have colorectal cancer. We investigated alternative diagnoses and demographics associated with a raised f-Hb in symptomatic patients.

Methods

A retrospective, observational study was performed of patients with FIT submitted between August 2018 to January 2019 in NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde followed by colonoscopy. Colonoscopy/pathology reports were searched for alternative diagnoses. Covariables were compared using the χ² test. Multivariate binary logistic regression identified independent predictors of a raised f-Hb.

Results

1272 patients were included. In addition to colorectal cancer (odds ratio (OR), 9.27 (95% confidence interval (CI): 3.61–23.83; p < 0.001)), older age (OR, 1.52 (95% CI: 1.00–2.32; p = 0.05)), deprivation (OR, 1.54 (95% CI: 1.21–1.94; p < 0.001)), oral anticoagulants (OR, 1.78 (95% CI: 1.01–3.15; p = 0.046)), rectal bleeding (OR, 1.47 (95% CI: 1.15–1.88; p = 0.002)), advanced adenoma (OR, 7.52 (95% CI: 3.90–14.49; p < 0.001)), non-advanced polyps (OR, 1.78 (95% CI: 1.33–2.38; p < 0.001)) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (OR, 4.19 (95% CI: 2.17–8.07; p < 0.001)) independently predicted raised f-Hb. Deprivation (Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) 1-2: OR, 2.13 (95% CI: 1.38–3.29; p = 0.001)) independently predicted a raised f-Hb in patients with no pathology found at colonoscopy.

Conclusions

An elevated f-Hb is independently associated with older age, deprivation, anticoagulants, rectal bleeding, advanced adenoma, non-advanced polyps and IBD in symptomatic patients. Deprivation is associated with a raised f-Hb in the absence of pathology. This must be considered when utilising FIT in symptomatic patients.

Serrated Lesion Detection in a Population-based Colon Screening Program

BACKGROUND

Serrated lesions give rise to 15% to 30% of all colorectal cancers, driven predominantly by the sessile serrated polyp (SSP). Fecal immunochemical test (FIT), has low sensitivity for SSPs. SSP detection rate (SSPDR) is influenced by performance of both endoscopists and pathologists, as diagnosis can be subtle both on endoscopy and histology.

GOALS

To evaluate the SSPDR in a population-based screening program, and the influence of subspecialty trained pathologists on provincial reporting practices.

STUDY

The colon screening program database was used to identify all FIT-positive patients that received colonoscopy between January 2014 and June 2017. Patient demographics, colonoscopy quality indicators, pathologic diagnoses, and FIT values were collected. This study received IRB approval.

RESULTS

A total of 74,605 colonoscopies were included and 26.6% had at least 1 serrated polyp removed. The SSPDR was 7.0%, with 59% of the SSPs detected having a concurrent conventional adenoma. The mean FIT value for colonoscopies with only serrated lesions was less than that for colonoscopies with a conventional adenoma or colorectal cancer (P<0.0001). Centers with a gastrointestinal subspecialty pathologist diagnosed proportionally more SSPs (P<0.0001), and right-sided SSPs than centers without subspecialists.

CONCLUSIONS

Serrated lesions often occur in conjunction with conventional adenomas and are associated with lower FIT values. Knowledge of the characteristics of SSPs is essential for pathologists to ensure accurate diagnosis of SSPs.

Future Prospects of Colorectal Cancer Screening: Characterizing Interval Cancers

Tumors that are not detected by screening tests are known as interval cancers and are diagnosed clinically after a negative result in the screening episode but before the next screening invitation. Clinical characteristics associated with interval colorectal cancers have been studied, but few molecular data are available that describe interval colorectal cancers. A better understanding of the clinical and biological characteristics associated with interval colorectal cancer may provide new insights into how to prevent this disease more effectively. This review aimed to summarize the current literature concerning interval colorectal cancer and its epidemiological, clinical, and molecular features.

Simulated performance of flexible sigmoidoscopy-based screening for advanced neoplasia detection in a Greek population

BACKGROUND

Flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) is resource-conserving and may increase adherence to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening compared to total colonoscopy. We investigated the diagnostic performance of FS-based screening for advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN), including advanced adenomatous neoplasms (AANs), advanced serrated lesions (ASLs) and CRCs.

METHODS

Data from 2005 subjects undergoing average-risk screening colonoscopy in a single center in Greece were retrospectively reviewed. Sensitivities of FS-based screening for detecting AANs, ASLs, CRCs or any ACN were simulated on a per-lesion basis, assuming: 1) FS up to the sigmoid-descending junction (FS-1) or splenic flexure (FS-2); 2) colonoscopy referral criteria according to the 4 screening FS trials conducted in UK, Italy, Norway, and USA.

RESULTS

Overall, 114 ACNs (93 AANs, 17 ASLs, 4 CRCs) were detected in 102 (5.1%) subjects. The overall sensitivities of FS-1 and FS-2 alone for the detection of any ACN were 41.2% and 54.4%, respectively. Assuming different colonoscopy referral criteria, the estimated sensitivities for any ACN ranged from 48.2-50.9% for FS-1 and 60.5-64% for FS-2. The overall sensitivities were lower for ASLs (FS-1: 35.3-41.2%, FS-2: 41.2-52.9%) compared to those observed for AANs (FS-1: 48.4-51.6%, FS-2: 62.4-66.7%). The difference was particularly pronounced in women, in whom all 4 criteria led equally to a very low sensitivity for ASLs (30%).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of FS-based screening in Greek subjects would have led to the detection of 48-64% of all ACNs. An alarmingly low detection of ASLs among women may call for gender-specific colonoscopy referral strategies.