Propofol sedation without endotracheal intubation is safe for endoscopic submucosal dissection in the esophagus and stomach

Continuous cuff pressure control on middle-aged and elderly patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection of the esophagus effect of airway injury

OBJECTIVE

Assessment of the effect of continuous cuff pressure control on airway injury in middle-aged and elderly patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).

METHOD

A total of 104 eligible middle-aged and elderly patients requiring esophageal ESD from July 2022-September 2023 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University were selected and randomly divided into two groups: the group undergoing general anesthesia tracheal intubation with continuous control of cuff pressure after intubation (Group A, n = 51) and the group undergoing general anesthesia tracheal intubation with continuous monitoring without control of cuff pressure (Group B, n = 53). After endotracheal intubation in Group A, under the guidance of an automatic cuff pressure controller, the air was used to inflate the tracheal cuff until the cuff pressure was 25-30cmH2O. The cuff pressure after intubation was recorded, and then the cuff pressure parameters were directly adjusted in the range of 25-30cmH2O until tracheal extubation after the operation. After endotracheal intubation, patients in Group B inflated the tracheal cuff with clinical experience, then monitored and recorded the cuff pressure with a handheld cuff manometer and instructed the cuff not to be loosened after being connected to the handheld cuff manometer-continuous monitoring until the tracheal extubation, but without any cuff pressure regulation. The patients of the two groups performed esophageal ESD. The left recumbent position was taken before the operation, and the cuff's pressure was recorded. Then, insert the gastrointestinal endoscope to find the lesion site and perform appropriate CO2 inflation to display the diseased esophageal wall for surgical operation fully. After determining the location, the cuff pressure of the two groups was recorded when the cuff pressure was stable. After the operation, the upper gastrointestinal endoscope was removed and the cuff pressure of the two groups was recorded. Postoperative airway injury assessment was performed in both groups, and the incidence of sore throat, hoarseness, cough, and blood in sputum was recorded. The incidence of postoperative airway mucosal injury was also observed and recorded in both groups: typical, episodic congestion spots and patchy local congestion.

RESULT

The incidence of normal airway mucosa in Group A was higher than that in Group B (P < 0.05). In comparison, the incidence of occasional hyperemia and local plaque congestion in Group A was lower than in Group B (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Continuous cuff pressure control during operation can reduce airway injury in patients with esophageal ESD and accelerate their early recovery after the operation.

Indications, contraindications, and safety aspects of procedural sedation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is a steadily increasing demand for procedural sedation outside the operating room, frequently performed in comorbid high-risk adult patients. This review evaluates the feasibility and advantages of sedation vs. general anesthesia for some of these new procedures.

RECENT FINDINGS

Generally, sedation performed by experienced staff is safe. Although for some endoscopic or transcatheter interventions sedation is feasible, results of the intervention might be improved when performed under general anesthesia. For elected procedures like intra-arterial treatment after acute ischemic stroke, avoiding general anesthesia and sedation at all might be the optimal treatment.

SUMMARY

Anesthesiologists are facing continuously new indications for procedural sedation in sometimes sophisticated diagnostic or therapeutic procedures. Timely availability of anesthesia staff will mainly influence who is performing sedation, anesthesia or nonanesthesia personal. While the number of absolute contraindications for sedation decreased to almost zero, relative contraindications are becoming more relevant and should be tailored to the individual procedure and patient.