The treatment of achalasia patients with esophageal varices: an international study

Review article: Oesophageal disorders in chronic liver disease

BACKGROUND

Oesophageal disorders and chronic liver disease are common worldwide and significantly impact quality of life. The intricate link between these conditions, including how oesophageal disorders like GERD, Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal cancer affect and are affected by chronic liver disease, remains poorly understood.

AIMS

To review the relationship between oesophageal disorders and chronic liver disease, evaluating epidemiology, pathophysiology and therapeutic factors.

METHODS

We reviewed the literature on the relationship between oesophageal disorders and chronic liver disease, including cirrhosis, using the PubMed database RESULTS: Oesophageal disorders such as gastroesophageal reflux disease, Barrett's oesophagus, oesophageal cancer, oesophageal motor disorders and oesophageal candidiasis are prevalent among individuals with cirrhosis, exacerbating the burden of liver disease. These diseases have a multifaceted symptomatology and pathogenic basis, posing a significant challenge in cirrhotic patients that necessitates careful diagnosis and management. Additionally, therapies frequently used for these diseases, such as proton pump inhibitors, require careful consideration in cirrhotic patients due to potential adverse effects and altered pharmacokinetics. Managing oesophageal disorders in cirrhotic patients requires a cautious approach due to possible interactions with medications and the risk of adverse effects. Furthermore, symptoms associated with these conditions are often exacerbated by common interventions in patients with cirrhosis, such as band ligation for oesophageal varices.

CONCLUSIONS

Oesophageal disorders are common in cirrhosis and increase the disease burden. These conditions require careful management due to complex symptoms and treatment risks. Proton pump inhibitors and other therapies must be used cautiously, as cirrhosis interventions can worsen symptoms.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy in the presence of small esophageal varices

Video 1XXX.

Ultrarapid Development of Ruptured Esophageal Varices in a Patient With a History of Heller Myotomy

Esophageal varices commonly affect cirrhotic patients as a result of elevated portal system resistance. Blood pools within esophageal portosystemic collateral vessels, which can eventually rupture, leading to life-threatening hemorrhage. To prevent this, cirrhotic patients without a history of varices undergo endoscopic surveillance for varices every 2-3 years. We present an unusual case of variceal hemorrhage in a patient who was seen to have no varices on endoscopic evaluation only a month earlier.

Safe Use of POEM in a Patient With Decompensated Cirrhosis and Severe Achalasia

Patients with both achalasia and decompensated cirrhosis can often present a therapeutic challenge because portal hypertension has generally been considered a contraindication to definitive therapies for achalasia. This case report depicts a patient who presented with progressive dysphagia, weight loss, and large-volume ascites; was diagnosed with type II achalasia and decompensated cirrhosis without esophageal varices; and underwent peroral endoscopic myotomy after preprocedural transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement. Our case highlights the importance of multidisciplinary care and need for definitive therapies for these complex patients at high risk of malnutrition and sarcopenia.

Evaluating the Non-conventional Achalasia Treatment Modalities

Introduction

Achalasia is a primary esophageal dysmotility disorder. Despite the high volume of studies addressing the conventional treatments for achalasia, few are debated regarding the non-conventional treatments, such as cardiectomy, cardioplasty, endoluminal substances injection (ethanolamine oleate, polidocanol, botulinum toxin), stents, and certain drugs (beta-agonists, anticholinergic, nitrates, calcium channel blockers, and phosphodiesterase inhibitors).

Methods

A critical review was performed.

Results

Endoscopic, surgical, and pharmacological treatments were included. A qualitative synthesis was presented.

Conclusion

Non-conventional therapeutic options for treating achalasia encompass medical, endoscopic, and surgical procedures. Clinicians and patients need to know all the tools for the management of achalasia. However, several currently available studies of non-conventional treatments lack high-quality evidence, and future randomized trials are still needed.