Guideline of guidelines: management of recurrent urinary tract infections in women

OBJECTIVE

To compare recurrent urinary tract infection (rUTI) guidelines from major urological and non-urological organisations internationally and identify areas of consensus and discrepancy.

METHODS

PubMed, Google Scholar and the official webpages of major urological, gynaecological, infectious diseases and general practice organisations were searched for rUTI guidelines in March 2022. Nine guidelines were included for review: European Association of Urology, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, American Academy of Family Physicians, Mexican College of Gynaecology and Obstetrics Specialists, Swiss Society of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, German Association of Scientific Medical Societies, and the combined American Urological Association/Canadian Urological Association/Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogenital Reconstruction.

RESULTS

The definition and evaluation of rUTIs, and antibiotic prophylaxis strategies, were mostly consistent across guidelines, and emphasised the importance of obtaining urine cultures and limiting cystoscopy and upper tract imaging in women without risk factors. Variable recommendations were noted for symptomatic treatment, self-initiated antibiotics, and antibiotic-sparing preventative strategies such as cranberry, vaginal oestrogen, immunoactive prophylaxis with OM-89, intravesical glycosaminoglycan instillation, and phytotherapeutics. Recent randomised evidence supports the use of methenamine hippurate. Either continuous or post-coital prophylactic antibiotics were supported by all guidelines. None of the guidelines were tailored to the management recurrent complicated UTI.

CONCLUSION

Multiple rUTI guidelines were identified and mostly limited their recommendations to otherwise healthy non-pregnant women with uncomplicated cystitis. Variation was noted, particularly in antibiotic-sparing preventative strategies. Some conflicting recommendations are due to more recent guidelines including updated evidence. Future guidelines should consider recommendations to assist management of complex patient groups, such as recurrent complicated UTI.

Efficacy of antimicrobial intravesical treatment for uncomplicated recurrent urinary tract infections: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Intravesical antimicrobials (IVA) provide a localized modality of treatment for recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs). Owing to the sporadic use of these treatments, we conducted a systematic review on the efficacy of IVA in the management of uncomplicated rUTIs.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted for all English language articles from inception to April 2021 utilizing the Cochrane and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses standards with the following databases: PubMed, OVID Embase, Biomed Central, and Scopus. References were cross-examined for further articles. Risk of bias was assessed in the articles included using the Cochrane and Joanna Briggs Institute tools.

RESULTS

The initial search resulting in 476 titles led to 15 full-text articles. Of the 13 in the final review (2 RCTs), 3 used gentamicin and 10 used hyaluronic acid IVA. These included 764 participants, mostly women, with a mean age range of 27-80 (median: 53.1). There was a reduction in UTI frequency in 12 out of 13 studies, with 10 studies showing a statistically significant decrease. Dosages of 80 mg of gentamicin per instillation and both 40 mg and 800 mg of hyaluronic acid per instillation were found to be effective in reducing the frequency of UTIs in most studies. Eleven participants reported gentamicin-resistant infections after IVA treatment. Despite high levels of bias in selected categories, the 13 studies were designated to be of high quality for inclusion.

CONCLUSIONS

The IVAs gentamicin and hyaluronic acid with chondroitin sulphate demonstrated efficacy in the management of uncomplicated rUTIs, mostly in women.

Rationalising the use of investigation for urinary tract infections: Analysis of 700 patients and proposal for a diagnostic algorithm

AIMS

To evaluate the diagnostic yield of investigations performed on patients with a history of urinary tract infections (UTI).

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent cystoscopy and imaging for a history of UTI between 2014 and 2019 in a single UK teaching hospital. Data were collected on demographics, cystoscopy and radiological findings requiring further management. The cohort was stratified by age, gender and a confirmed history of recurrent UTI (rUTI). The subsequent algorithm was re-tested in a second cohort to validate its use.

RESULTS

Seven hundred patients were included in the primary analysis-427 female and 273 males. Three hundred and thirty-one met the criteria of rUTI. The median age was 64 years (18-97). Imaging abnormalities were equally frequent in men 6.3% (15/241) and women 8% (30/380) and the majority noted in patients aged ≥55 years, 30/45 (66.7%). Amongst those who did not meet the definition of rUTI, abnormal imaging was identified in 5%-7% regardless of age group and gender. Cystoscopy abnormalities (n = 24) were twice more likely in males, 5.5%(15/273) than females, 2%(9/427). About 88%(21/24) were identified in patients ≥55 years. There were no positive findings in women <55 years. Applying baseline imaging but confining cystoscopy to those aged ≥55 years and men with a confirmed history of rUTI would have saved 44% of procedures, missed no abnormalities with an overall diagnosis detection rate of 9.8% (69/700). This algorithm was validated in a separate cohort of 63 patients; applying it would have saved 46% (29/63) of cystoscopies with a positive diagnostic rate of 9.5% and no missed findings.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge this is one of the largest studies reporting the outcomes of investigations for UTI and rUTI. Our result suggests that imaging is a useful baseline assessment, but cystoscopy should be limited to specific subgroups. We propose and validate a simple decision algorithm to manage investigations for referrals for UTI in secondary care.