Outcomes of endometrial assessment in women with unscheduled bleeding on hormone replacement therapy

Management of unscheduled bleeding on HRT: A joint guideline on behalf of the British Menopause Society, Royal College Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, British Gynaecological Cancer Society, British Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy, Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Health, Royal College of General Practitioners and Getting it Right First Time

Unscheduled bleeding on hormone replacement therapy (HRT) can affect up to 40% of users. In parallel with the increase in HRT prescribing in the UK, there has been an associated increase in referrals to the urgent suspicion of cancer pathway for unscheduled bleeding. On behalf of the British Menopause Society (BMS) an expert review panel was established, including primary and secondary care clinicians with expertise in the management of menopause, with representatives from key related organisations, including the Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists, the British Gynaecological Cancer Society, British Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy, Royal College of General Practitioners and Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Health, and service development partners from NHS England and GIRFT (Getting it Right First Time). For each topic, a focused literature review was completed to develop evidence led recommendations, where available, which were ratified by consensus review within the panel and by guideline groups.

Endometrial cancer rate in Hormone replacement therapy users with postmenopausal bleeding: Retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To establish the endometrial cancer detection rate in women using hormone replacement therapy presenting with postmenopausal bleeding.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study. Setting and populationRapid access gynaecology clinic at a tertiary hospital. Women aged under 60 years referred with postmenopausal bleeding.

METHODS

Retrospective study of referrals received between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2020 including Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) use and histological diagnosis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Histological diagnosis of endometrial cancer, borderline ovarian tumour or endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Chi squared test.

RESULTS

1363 women were included. 214 women were using HRT when they experienced PMB and only one of these had endometrial cancer at histology (cancer detection rate 0.47%). 25 of the 1124 women who were not using HRT were diagnosed with endometrial cancer on histology (cancer detection rate 2.18%). Chi squared statistical analysis confirmed this was statistically significant (p value .0156).

CONCLUSIONS

The endometrial cancer detection rate in women aged under 60 years using HRT with PMB is very low. Referral on a two-week wait pathway for suspected cancer diagnosis induces stress and anxiety for the woman and may lead to more invasive initial investigation even though other diagnoses are far more likely. Women aged under 60 years with postmenopausal bleeding that have either commenced HRT or had a change to their preparation within the last 6 months should be seen on a less urgent referral pathway if necessary given the very low probability of endometrial cancer.

British menopause society tools for clinicians: Progestogens and endometrial protection

Progestogen administration is required to oppose naturally produced or administered estrogens to provide endometrial protection. Within HRT regimens, this should be delivered for at least the same duration as that produced during the luteal phase of the monthly cycle and in the recommended doses to protect against the risk of endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer. This includes progestogens administered for 12-14 days a month in sequential regimens and continuous daily intake in continuous combined HRT regimens. Shorter durations and lower doses of progestogen intake are likely to be associated with an increased risk of breakthrough bleeding, endometrial hyperplasia, and endometrial cancer.

A cross-sectional national questionnaire survey assessing the views of members of the British Menopause Society on the management of patients with unscheduled bleeding on hormone replacement therapy

OBJECTIVE

To explore the views of members of the British Menopause Society on the management of women with unscheduled bleeding on hormone replacement therapy.

STUDY DESIGN

An electronic cross-sectional questionnaire survey.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Investigations, treatment options and preferences for the management of women with unscheduled bleeding on hormone replacement therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 91/178 (51%) clinicians investigate patients with unscheduled bleeding within three to six months of starting sequential hormone replacement therapy (seq-HRT) versus 83/178 (47%) for continuous combined hormone replacement therapy (con-HRT). A total of 52/178 (29%) versus 54/178 (30%) would investigate unscheduled bleeding continuing beyond six months while 18/178 (10%) versus 26/178 (15%) would investigate within three months. Assessment is requested as urgent by 88/176 (50%) clinicians, routine by 47/176 (27%) and a two-week-wait-suspected cancer referral by 41/176 (23%). A total of 97/178 (55%) clinicians would continue seq-HRT and refer versus 117/178 (66%) for con-HRT. A total of 46/178 (26%) clinicians would change the progestogen preparation in women with unscheduled bleeding on seq-HRT. For women on con-HRT, 12/178 (7%) clinicians would change to seq-HRT and 8/178 (5%) to the Mirena IUS. The Mirena IUS is the preferred progestogen for 81/178 (45%) of clinicians when prescribing hormone replacement therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a varied approach in the practise amongst British Menopause Society members to managing women with unscheduled bleeding on hormone replacement therapy. Further research is needed to determine the optimal assessment pathways for women with unscheduled bleeding on hormone replacement therapy.