Consensus statement - Urogenital atrophy

A systematic review and critical appraisal of menopause guidelines

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

To identify and appraise current national and international clinical menopause guidance documents, and to extract and compare the recommendations of the most robust examples.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Web of Science ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Practice guidance documents for menopause published from 2015 until 20 July 2023. Quality was assessed by the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument.

RESULTS

Twenty-six guidance papers were identified. Of these, five clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and one non-hormonal therapy position statement met AGREE II criteria of being at least of moderate quality. The five CPGs listed symptoms associated with the perimenopause and menopause to be vasomotor symptoms (VMS), disturbed sleep, musculoskeletal pain, decreased sexual function or desire, and mood disturbance (low mood, mood changes or depressive symptoms). Acknowledged potential long-term menopause consequences were urogenital atrophy, and increased risks of cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis. VMS and menopause-associated mood disturbance were the only consistent indications for systemic menopausal hormone therapy (MHT). Some CPGs supported MHT to prevent or treat osteoporosis, but specific guidance was lacking. None recommended MHT for cognitive symptoms or prevention of other chronic disease. Perimenopause-specific recommendations were scant. A neurokinin 3B antagonist, selective serotonin/norepinephrine (noradrenaline) reuptake inhibitors and gabapentin were recommended non-hormonal medications for VMS, and cognitive behavioural therapy and hypnosis were consistently considered as being of potential benefit.

DISCUSSION

The highest quality CPGs consistently recommended MHT for VMS and menopause-associated mood disturbance, whereas clinical depression or cognitive symptoms, and cardiometabolic disease and dementia prevention were not treatment indications. Further research is needed to inform clinical recommendations for symptomatic perimenopausal women.

Injection Treatments for Vulvovaginal Atrophy of Menopause: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Injection treatments have been proposed as novel treatment options for Vulvovaginal Atrophy of Menopause (VVA) also known as Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause (GSM). However, to date data about these treatments are poor.

OBJECTIVE

To assess all available injection treatments for VVA.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed by searching five electronic databases for peer-reviewed studies that assessed injection treatments for VVA.

RESULTS

Eight studies (7 observational and 1 randomized) with 236 women were included. Assessed injection materials were: autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) + hyaluronic acid (HA), not cross-linked HA plus calcium hydroxyapatite (NCLHA + CaHA), micro-fragmented adipose tissue (MFAT), hyaluronan hybrid cooperative complexes (HCC), crosslinked HA, microfat and nanofat grafting + PRP, and PRP alone. Improvement in GSM symptoms after treatment was assessed through Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) for GSM symptoms or patient satisfaction, several validated questionnaires (FSFI, VHI, FSD, SF12, ICIQ UI SF, PGI-I, FSDS-R, VSQ), symptoms severity, changes in vaginal mucosa thickness, flora, pH, and expression on vaginal mucosal biopsies of Procollagen I and III and ki67 immunofluorescence or COL1A1 and COL3A1 mRNA. Injection treatments showing significant improvement in GSM-related symptoms were: (i) HCC in terms of VAS for GSM symptoms and FSFI score; (ii) Crosslinked HA in terms of VAS for GSM symptoms, FSFI and VHI score, COL1A1 and COL3A1 mRNA expression on vaginal mucosal biopsies; (iii) NCLHA + CaHA in terms of FSFI score; (iv) PRP + HA in terms of VHI, FSD and SF12 score; (v) microfat and nanofat grafting + PRP in terms of VHI score and FSDS-R score; (vi) PRP alone in terms of VHI and VSQ scores.

CONCLUSIONS

All assessed injection treatments except for MFAT seem to lead to significant improvement in VVA symptoms on validated questionnaires. Further studies are necessary in the field.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Estradiol and Estrogen-like Alternative Therapies in Use: The Importance of the Selective and Non-Classical Actions

Estrogen is one of the most important female sex hormones, and is indispensable for reproduction. However, its role is much wider. Among others, due to its neuroprotective effects, estrogen protects the brain against dementia and complications of traumatic injury. Previously, it was used mainly as a therapeutic option for influencing the menstrual cycle and treating menopausal symptoms. Unfortunately, hormone replacement therapy might be associated with detrimental side effects, such as increased risk of stroke and breast cancer, raising concerns about its safety. Thus, tissue-selective and non-classical estrogen analogues have become the focus of interest. Here, we review the current knowledge about estrogen effects in a broader sense, and the possibility of using selective estrogen-receptor modulators (SERMs), selective estrogen-receptor downregulators (SERDs), phytoestrogens, and activators of non-genomic estrogen-like signaling (ANGELS) molecules as treatment.