British Menopause Society Tool for clinicians: Testosterone replacement in menopause

Premature ovarian insufficiency: When ovaries retire early

Introduction

Premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) refers to loss of ovarian activity before the age 40 years. POI has significant detrimental effects on health (infertility, cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes, reduced bone density, dementia), well-being and longevity. This summary is a practical toolkit for health-care professionals (HCPs) looking after women with POI.

Method

A workgroup comprising specialists in gynaecology, reproductive medicine, endocrinology, genetics and family medicine reviewed relevant guidelines and literature on POI to establish recom-mendations for the diagnosis and management of POI in Singapore.

Results

A summary to assist HCPs manage POI was produced, outlining: (1) the aetiology and conse-quences of POI; (2) making the diagnosis; (3) hormone therapy (HT) prescribing options including for those with additional medical conditions; (4) counselling women with POI about HT; and (5) long-term management of POI.

Conclusion

Timely diagnosis and management of POI is vital to prevent long-term adverse consequences, except infertility. HT is the mainstay of treatment and there are no alternatives as effective. Contraindications are very few; estrogen-sensitive cancer is the main contraindication, and caution in prescribing may be needed with established coexisting cardiovascular disease. Estrogen dosage is higher than when treating normal menopause, and as a result, the patient might require more progestogen for endometrial protection. Minimising cardiovascular risk factors by following a healthy lifestyle is important. POI is a significant public health issue and it is imperative that women have affordable access to appropriate HT. Large-scale research on POI in Asian women is needed.

Menopause and MHT in 2024: addressing the key controversies - an International Menopause Society White Paper

The vision of the International Menopause Society (IMS) is that all women across the world will have easy and equitable access to evidence-based knowledge and health care, empowering them to make fully informed midlife health choices. The aim of this White Paper is to provide a well-balanced educational narrative of the menopause and menopause hormone therapy (MHT) from IMS experts, leading into World Menopause Day 2024. This is achieved by exploring the anthropology and history of menopause, the principles and controversies of prescribing MHT, and by placing this into regulatory and menopause society contexts. The White Paper also lays the groundwork for the forthcoming updated IMS recommendations on menopause and will act as a blueprint for the future ethical management of menopause from practical and aspirational perspectives. An important section of the paper is 'The 5Ws of prescribing MHT': WHO is MHT for; WHAT types and doses of MHT; WHEN should MHT be started and stopped; WHY is MHT important; WHERE can MHT be accessed? A key points summary of this information is provided for healthcare professionals and the public. The summary provides 'easy to access' advice regarding several recent controversial MHT prescribing issues in the healthcare and media spotlights.

A systematic review of randomised clinical trials - The safety of vaginal hormones and selective estrogen receptor modulators for the treatment of genitourinary menopausal symptoms in breast cancer survivors

Therapies utilised in breast cancer management have been found to induce or worsen the genitourinary symptoms of menopause (GSM), a group of physical symptoms associated with the systemic loss of estrogen. These symptoms are often undertreated due to concerns surrounding cancer recurrence, especially when considering treatments with possible pro-estrogenic effects. As breast cancer prognosis continues to improve, clinicians are increasingly focussing on managing these symptoms amongst survivors. This systematic review primarily aimed to determine the risk of breast cancer recurrence amongst survivors using vaginal hormones and selective estrogen receptor modulator therapies recommended for use in GSM in the United Kingdom amongst currently published randomised clinical trials (RCTs). The secondary aim was to determine whether these RCTs demonstrated a significant rise in serum estrogen levels following the use of these therapies. A literature search revealed three RCTs suitable for assessment, two evaluating vaginal estrogen and one evaluating vaginal DHEA treatment. Our review determined that amongst published RCTs, no studies have aimed to assess for breast cancer recurrence; however among the studies observing for serious adverse effects of vaginal estrogen preparations, none have reported an increased incidence. Furthermore, these studies did not report a persistent or significant increase in serum estrogen levels following the use of vaginal estrogen products and low concentration (3.25 mg/day) DHEA gel. Larger RCTs studying commonly used vaginal preparations and selective estrogen receptor modulator treatments for GSM over longer follow-up periods will be vital to better assess the risk of breast cancer recurrence in survivors receiving these treatments.