Pharmacologic Therapies for Aortic Stiffness in End-Stage Renal Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

VItamin K In PEritonial DIAlysis (VIKIPEDIA): Rationale and study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Vascular calcification (VC) is an active process, resulting from the disturbance of balance between inhibitors and promoters of calcification, in favor of the latter. Matrix Gla Protein, a powerful inhibitor of VC, needs vitamin K to become active. In vitamin K depletion, plasma levels of the inactive form of MGP, dephosphorylated, uncarboxylated MGP (dp-ucMGP) are increased and associated with VC and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) patients have increased circulating dp-ucMGP levels and accelerated VC. VItamin K In PEritoneal DIAlysis (VIKIPEDIA) is a prospective, randomized, open label, placebo-controlled trial, evaluating the effect of vitamin K2 supplementation on arterial stiffness and CV events in ESRD patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD). Forty-four PD patients will be included in the study. At baseline, dp-ucMGP and pulse-wave velocity (PWV) will be assessed and then patients will be randomized (1:1 ratio) to vitamin K (1000 μg MK-7/day) or placebo for 1.5 years. The primary endpoint of this trial is the change in PWV in the placebo group as compared to the treatment group. Secondary endpoints are the occurrence of CV events, mortality, changes in PD adequacy, change in 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure indexes and aortic systolic blood pressure and changes in calcium/phosphorus/parathormone metabolism. VIKIPEDIA is a new superiority randomized, open label, placebo-controlled trial aiming to determine the effect of vitamin K2 supplementation on VC, CV disease and calcium/phosphorus metabolism, in PD patients.

Trial registration: The protocol of this study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with identification number NCT04900610 (25 May 2021).

Arterial Stiffness and Cardiovascular Risk in Hypertension

Arterial stiffness, a leading marker of risk in hypertension, can be measured at material or structural levels, with the latter combining effects of the geometry and composition of the wall, including intramural organization. Numerous studies have shown that structural stiffness predicts outcomes in models that adjust for conventional risk factors. Elastic arteries, nearer to the heart, are most sensitive to effects of blood pressure and age, major determinants of stiffness. Stiffness is usually considered as an index of vascular aging, wherein individuals excessively affected by risk factor exposure represent early vascular aging, whereas those resistant to risk factors represent supernormal vascular aging. Stiffness affects the function of the brain and kidneys by increasing pulsatile loads within their microvascular beds, and the heart by increasing left ventricular systolic load; excessive pressure pulsatility also decreases diastolic pressure, necessary for coronary perfusion. Stiffness promotes inward remodeling of small arteries, which increases resistance, blood pressure, and in turn, central artery stiffness, thus creating an insidious feedback loop. Chronic antihypertensive treatments can reduce stiffness beyond passive reductions due to decreased blood pressure. Preventive drugs, such as lipid-lowering drugs and antidiabetic drugs, have additional effects on stiffness, independent of pressure. Newer anti-inflammatory drugs also have blood pressure independent effects. Reduction of stiffness is expected to confer benefit beyond the lowering of pressure, although this hypothesis is not yet proven. We summarize different steps for making arterial stiffness measurement a keystone in hypertension management and cardiovascular prevention as a whole.

Arterial stiffness: A brief review

Apart from the result of multiple diseases as well as aging, arterial stiffness (AS) predicts cardiovascular disease (CVD), especially in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Patients with CKD have high CVD prevalence, and an extraordinarily high risk for CVD might be related to nontraditional risk factors, including AS. The mechanism of AS development could be attributed to oxidative stress, inflammation, uremic milieu (e.g., uremic toxins), vascular calcification, and cumulative effects of traditional cardiovascular risk factors on arteries such as diabetes mellitus or hypertension. There were a variety of non-invasive techniques to measure AS. One of these techniques is carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity, which is the reference measurement of AS and is related to long-term CVD outcomes. AS progression has corresponding medical treatments with modest beneficial results. This review briefly discusses the risk factors, measurements, and treatments associated with AS.

Cardiovascular Risk Assessment Using Ultrasonographic Surrogate Markers of Atherosclerosis and Arterial Stiffness in Patients With Chronic Renal Impairment: A Narrative Review of the Evidence and a Critical View of Their Utility in Clinical Practice

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Validated tools to improve cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are lacking. Noninvasive measures of arteriosclerosis and subclinical atherosclerosis such as pulse wave velocity (PWV) and carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), respectively, have emerged as promising risk stratification tools and potential modifiable biomarkers. Their wide use as surrogate markers in clinical research studies is based on the strong pathophysiological links with CVD. However, whether their effect as risk stratification or intervention targets is superior to established clinical approaches is uncertain. In this review, we examine the evidence on the utility of PWV, cIMT, and plaque assessment in routine practice and highlight unanswered questions from the clinician's perspective.

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

Electronic databases PubMed and Google Scholar were searched until February 2020.

METHODS

This narrative review is based on peer-reviewed meta-analyses, national and international societies' guidelines, and on focused critical review of recent original studies and landmark studies in the field.

KEY FINDINGS

Although patients with CKD are considered in the high-risk CVD groups, there is still need for tools to improve risk stratification and individualized management strategies within this group of patients. Carotid intima-media thickness is associated with all-cause mortality, CVD mortality, and events in CKD and hemodialysis cohorts. However, the evidence that measurement of cIMT has a clinically meaningful role over and above existing risk scores and management strategies is limited. Plaque assessment is a better predictor than cIMT in non-CKD populations and it has been incorporated in recent nonrenal-specific guidelines. In the CKD population, one large observational study provided evidence for a potential role of plaque assessment in CKD similar to the non-CKD studies; however, whether it improves prediction and outcomes in CKD is largely understudied. Pulse wave velocity as a marker of arterial stiffness has a strong pathophysiological link with CVD in CKD and numerous observational studies demonstrated associations with increased cardiovascular risk. However, PWV did not improve CVD reclassification of dialysis patients when added to common risk factors in a reanalysis of ESRD cohorts with available PWV data. Therapeutic strategies to regress PWV, independently from blood pressure reduction, have not been studied in well-conducted randomized trials.

LIMITATIONS

This study provides a comprehensive review based on extensive literature search and critical appraisal of included studies. Nevertheless, formal systematic literature review and quality assessment were not performed and the possibility of selection bias cannot be excluded.

IMPLICATIONS

Larger, prospective, randomized studies with homogeneous approach, designed to answer specific clinical questions and taking into consideration special characteristics of CKD and dialysis, are needed to study the potentially beneficial role of cIMT/plaque assessment and PWV in routine practice.