Design and Development of a Digital Counseling Program for Chronic Kidney Disease

Investigating the Interplay Between Sleep, Anxiety, and Depression in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: Implications for Mental Health

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

This study aims to determine the level of anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbances in patients with chronic kidney disease, as well as the interactions between the three comorbidities, and the implications it has for health practitioners.

METHODS

A descriptive cross-sectional study, following the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines, was implemented whereby 179 patients with chronic kidney disease attending a government hospital were recruited to this study.

RESULTS

Our results showed that 65.9% of the participants had the metrics of severe anxiety while 34.1 percent had moderate anxiety. Further, it was reported that more than half 51.4% of participants had poor sleep quality. The levels of depression reported by the patients were roughly 40.2% minimal depression, 29.6% mild, 21.2% moderate, and 8.9% depression that was severe. There was a significant correlation between mental health disease together with sociodemographic variables such as gender, marital status, educational status, and nationality (p < 0.05). Cut points of those aged 26-35 found younger patients experiencing higher anxiety levels (cut point (AOR = 2.792; p = 0.021)), and they also had poorer sleep quality (AOR = 0.403; p = 0.020).

CONCLUSION

Our findings illustrate the importance of more frequent early mental health measures and strategies that help patients with chronic kidney diseases. The main study limitation was the cross-sectional design, which allows for correlational but not causal statements to be made. We address a gap in the literature with our results by noting specific demographic characteristics that are associated with poor mental health in chronic kidney disease populations and discuss practical and policy recommendations aimed at enhancing the mental well-being of chronic kidney disease patients.

Exploring Patient Needs and Preferences in CKD Education: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study

Key Points

This largest to date patient survey study explores what patients with kidney disease want to know about treatments, such as dialysis or conservative management. A surprising number of patients want extensive doctor-like education, but are willing to spend only several hours on education. Patients are notably open to online and digital educational modalities—technology may allow for individualized and ongoing patient education.

Background

Despite efforts to educate individuals with CKD and thereby improve outcomes, studies have shown that a significant number of patients still report poor CKD knowledge. Thus, understanding patient needs and preferences is crucial for the development and implementation of an effective CKD educational program.

Methods

A paper survey was distributed to patients with CKD 21 years and older at a tertiary care hospital's outpatient nephrology clinic in Rochester, NY. Data on patient demographics; print and technological literacies; and preferences regarding topics, instructors, class formats, session frequency, duration, and peer support were gathered.

Results

The mean age of 337 patients was 65 years (±12.33 years), and the self-identified races were American Indian or Alaska Native (<1%), Asian (3%), Black (12.17%), Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander (<1%), White (83%), and Other (2%). Most of the patients (69%) never needed help with health instructions, and 68% of patients used a smartphone or computer every day. Key topics identified by patients included the definitions of CKD, creatinine, and GFR and information on kidney diet. Seventy-three percent of patients desired more than basic CKD information, with one in five even wanting to know everything a doctor knows. Forty-six percent were willing to attend classes, and 33% preferred using digital (video, computer, or smartphone) modalities. Patients were willing to attend an average of 3.6 classes, and most preferred hour-long classes. Most of the patients (46%) preferred a doctor as the educator, and 53% expressed interest in connecting with fellow patients for peer support.

Conclusions

Most patients with CKD are interested in comprehensive education about their disease. This research may offer insights into the optimal content and delivery of CKD educational programs by elaborating on patients' needs and the integration of online modalities to deliver content. Future person-centered educational programs for people with CKD are needed.

Automated Digital Counseling Program (ODYSSEE-Kidney Health): A Pilot Study on Health-Related Quality of Life

Key Points

Feasibility of implementing an automated, scalable, digital self-care program for patients with CKD was established. The primary outcome of improvement in health-related quality of life improved with the ODYSSEE-Kidney Health program. A dose relationship was shown between program engagement tertile and improvement in 4-month outcomes.

Background

In-person counseling programs promote self-care behavior and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). ODYSSEE-Kidney Health (prO moting health with D igitallY based counS eling for S elf-care bE havior and quality of lifE ; ODYSSEE-KH) is an automated, scalable, digital counseling program for patients with CKD. This open-label, single-arm pilot study tested the efficacy potential of the ODYSSEE-KH program to improve HRQoL in patients with CKD.

Methods

Adults with categories G3b to 5d CKD were recruited from nephrology clinics in Toronto, Canada. Patients (N =29) received access to the ODYSSEE-KH program in conjunction with usual care. Generalized linear models and pairwise comparisons of mean change scores were conducted to assess the primary outcome: Mental Component Score (MCS) of the Kidney Disease Quality of Life–Short Form instrument. Secondary outcomes included the MCS Mental Health Scale, 36-Item Kidney Disease Quality of Life–Short Form, Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire for depression, Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease Social Support Instrument, and 3-Item Revised University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 53.5 years (SD=18.3); 35% were women; 56% were White; 93% had completed ≥postsecondary education; patients came from the Multi-Care Kidney Clinic (n =9), Home Peritoneal Dialysis Unit (n =12), and Home Hemodialysis Unit (n =8); and 24 participants completed the 4-month end-of-study questionnaires. Outcomes were assessed according to tertiles of program log-on minutes: median (range)=67 (62–108), 212 (119–355), and 500 (359–1573) minutes, respectively. Patients in the highest tertile of engagement showed significant improvements on the MCS versus the moderate tertile group (P = 0.01). Significant dose-response associations were observed for the MCS Mental Health Scale (P < 0.05), KDQoL Burden on Kidney Disease (P < 0.01), KDQoL Effect of Kidney Disease on Everyday Life (P < 0.01), aggregated KDQoL Summary Scale (P < 0.05), Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (P < 0.01), Patient Health Questionnaire for Depression (P < 0.05), Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease Social Support Instrument (P < 0.01), and 3-Item Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale (P < 0.01).

Conclusion

The ODYSSEE-KH program demonstrated feasibility as an automated, scalable, digital self-care program for patients with CKD. There is evidence of its efficacy potential to improve HRQoL. Further evaluation with a larger sample is warranted.