The use of artificial intelligence applications in medicine and the standard required for healthcare provider-patient briefings-an exploratory study

AI-Enhanced Healthcare: Not a new Paradigm for Informed Consent

With the increasing prevalence of artificial intelligence (AI) and other digital technologies in healthcare, the ethical debate surrounding their adoption is becoming more prominent. Here I consider the issue of gaining informed patient consent to AI-enhanced care from the vantage point of the United Kingdom's National Health Service setting. I build my discussion around two claims from the World Health Organization: that healthcare services should not be denied to individuals who refuse AI-enhanced care and that there is no precedence to seeking patient consent to AI-enhanced care. I discus U.K. law relating to patient consent and the General Data Protection Regulation to show that current standards relating to patient consent are adequate for AI-enhanced care. I then suggest that in the future it may not be possible to guarantee patient access to non-AI-enhanced healthcare, in a similar way to how we do not offer patients manual alternatives to automated healthcare processes. Throughout my discussion I focus on the issues of patient choice and veracity in the patient-clinician relationship. Finally, I suggest that the best way to protect patients from potential harms associated with the introduction of AI to patient care is not via an overly burdensome patient consent process but via evaluation and regulation of AI technologies.

Patient perspectives on informed consent for medical AI: A web-based experiment

Objective

Despite the increasing use of AI applications as a clinical decision support tool in healthcare, patients are often unaware of their use in the physician's decision-making process. This study aims to determine whether doctors should disclose the use of AI tools in diagnosis and what kind of information should be provided.

Methods

A survey experiment with 1000 respondents in South Korea was conducted to estimate the patients' perceived importance of information regarding the use of an AI tool in diagnosis in deciding whether to receive the treatment.

Results

The study found that the use of an AI tool increases the perceived importance of information related to its use, compared with when a physician consults with a human radiologist. Information regarding the AI tool when AI is used was perceived by participants either as more important than or similar to the regularly disclosed information regarding short-term effects when AI is not used. Further analysis revealed that gender, age, and income have a statistically significant effect on the perceived importance of every piece of AI information.

Conclusions

This study supports the disclosure of AI use in diagnosis during the informed consent process. However, the disclosure should be tailored to the individual patient's needs, as patient preferences for information regarding AI use vary across gender, age and income levels. It is recommended that ethical guidelines be developed for informed consent when using AI in diagnoses that go beyond mere legal requirements.

Exploring Depression and Nutritional Covariates Amongst US Adults using Shapely Additive Explanations

Background

Depression affects personal and public well-being and identification of natural therapeutics such as nutrition is necessary to help alleviate this public health concern.

Objective

The study aimed to identify feature importance in a machine learning model using solely nutrition covariates.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted using a modern, nationally representative cohort, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES 2017-2020). Depressive symptoms were evaluated using the validated 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and all adult patients (total of 7929 individuals) who completed the PHQ-9 and total nutritional intake questionnaire were included in the study. Univariable regression was used to identify significant nutritional covariates to be included in a machine learning model and feature importance was reported. The acquisition and analysis of the data were authorized by the National Center for Health Statistics Ethics Review Board.

Results

7929 patients met the inclusion criteria in this study. The machine learning model had 24 out of a total of 60 features that were found to be significant on univariate analysis (p < 0.01 used). In the XGBoost model the model had an Area Under the Receiver Operator Characteristic Curve (AUROC) = 0.603, Sensitivity = 0.943, Specificity = 0.163. The top four highest ranked features by gain, a measure of the percentage contribution of the covariate to the overall model prediction, were Potassium Intake (Gain = 6.8%), Vitamin E Intake (Gain = 5.7%), Number of Foods and Beverages Reported (Gain = 5.7%), and Vitamin K Intake (Gain 5.6%).

Conclusion

Machine learning models with feature importance can be utilized to identify nutritional covariates for further study in patients with clinical symptoms of depression.