A composite measure to explore visual disability in primary progressive multiple sclerosis

Retinal optical coherence tomography measures in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Spectral domain-optical coherence tomography plays a crucial role in the early detection and monitoring of multiple sclerosis (MS) pathophysiology. We aimed to quantify differences in retinal layer measures among different groups of MS and explored different variables that correlate with retinal measures. This study was reported according PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search was done across PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar. The mean difference in thickness of retinal layers and macular volume was assessed. Meta-regression was done to assess the sources of heterogeneity. A total of 100 articles were included in the meta-analyses. The peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness significantly decreased in the MSON (MD: -16.44, P < 0.001), MSNON (MD: -6.97, P < 0.001), and PMS (MD: -11.35, P < 0.001) versus HC. The macular RNFL was lower among the MSON (MD: -6.24, P = 0.013) and MSNON (MD: -3.84, P <0.001) versus HC. Macular ganglion cell layer and inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) was thinner among MSON (MD: -14.83, P <0.001), MSNON (MD: -6.38, P < 0.001), and PMS (MD: -11.52, P < 0.001) compared with control eyes. Inner nuclear layer (INL) was higher in the MSON (MD: 0.49, P < 0.001) versus HC. Outer nuclear layer (ONL) thickness significantly lower in the MSNON (MD: -1.15, P = 0.019) versus HC. Meta-regression showed that disease duration, age, EDSS score, and percentage of patients taking DMT are all negatively correlated with pRNFL and GCIPL thickness; however, female gender was correlated with less atrophy. As conclusion, the study highlights substantial thinning in the pRNFL and macular GCIPL between MS versus controls. INL as valuable parameter for capturing inflammatory disease activity.

Optical Coherence Tomography and Visual Evoked Potentials as Prognostic and Monitoring Tools in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

Understanding the mechanisms underlying progression and developing new treatments for progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS) are among the major challenges in the field of central nervous system (CNS) demyelinating diseases. Over the last 10 years, also because of some technological advances, the visual pathways have emerged as a useful platform to study the processes of demyelination/remyelination and their relationship with axonal degeneration/protection. The wider availability and technological advances in optical coherence tomography (OCT) have allowed to add information on structural neuroretinal changes, in addition to functional information provided by visual evoked potentials (VEPs). The present review will address the role of the visual pathway as a platform to assess functional and structural damage in MS, focusing in particular on the role of VEPs and OCT, alone or in combination, in the prognosis and monitoring of PMS.

Unraveling Deep Gray Matter Atrophy and Iron and Myelin Changes in Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Modifications of magnetic susceptibility have been consistently demonstrated in the subcortical gray matter of MS patients, but some uncertainties remain concerning the underlying neurobiological processes and their clinical relevance. We applied quantitative susceptibility mapping and longitudinal relaxation rate relaxometry to clarify the relative contribution of atrophy and iron and myelin changes to deep gray matter damage and disability in MS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Quantitative susceptibility mapping and longitudinal relaxation rate maps were computed for 91 patients and 55 healthy controls from MR images acquired at 3T. Applying an external model, we estimated iron and myelin concentration maps for all subjects. Subsequently, changes of deep gray matter iron and myelin concentration (atrophy-dependent) and content (atrophy-independent) were investigated globally (bulk analysis) and regionally (voxel-based and atlas-based thalamic subnuclei analyses). The clinical impact of the observed MRI modifications was evaluated via regression models.

RESULTS

We identified reduced thalamic (P < .001) and increased pallidal (P < .001) mean iron concentrations in patients with MS versus controls. Global myelin and iron content in the basal ganglia did not differ between the two groups, while actual iron depletion was present in the thalamus (P < .001). Regionally, patients showed increased iron concentration in the basal ganglia (P ≤ .001) and reduced iron and myelin content in thalamic posterior-medial regions (P ≤ .004), particularly in the pulvinar (P ≤ .001). Disability was predicted by thalamic volume (B = -0.341, P = .02), iron concentration (B = -0.379, P =  .005) and content (B = -0.406, P = .009), as well as pulvinar iron (B = -0.415, P = .003) and myelin (B = -0.415, P = .02) content, independent of atrophy.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative MRI suggests an atrophy-related iron increase within the basal ganglia of patients with MS, along with an atrophy-independent reduction of thalamic iron and myelin correlating with disability. Absolute depletions of thalamic iron and myelin may represent sensitive markers of subcortical GM damage, which add to the clinical impact of thalamic atrophy in MS.

A Review of Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Based Composite Metrics for Glycemic Control

We performed a literature review of composite metrics for describing the quality of glycemic control, as measured by continuous glucose monitors (CGMs). Nine composite metrics that describe CGM data were identified. They are described in detail along with their advantages and disadvantages. The primary benefit to using composite metrics in clinical practice is to be able to quickly evaluate a patient's glycemic control in the form of a single number that accounts for multiple dimensions of glycemic control. Very little data exist about (1) how to select the optimal components of composite metrics for CGM; (2) how to best score individual components of composite metrics; and (3) how to correlate composite metric scores with empiric outcomes. Nevertheless, composite metrics are an attractive type of scoring system to present clinicians with a single number that accounts for many dimensions of their patients' glycemia. If a busy health care professional is looking for a single-number summary statistic to describe glucose levels monitored by a CGM, then a composite metric has many attractive features.