Incidence of malignancy in multiple sclerosis: A cohort study in the Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry

Risk of cancer with immunosuppressants compared to immunomodulators in multiple sclerosis: A nested case-control study within the French nationwide claims database

PURPOSE

The objective was to compare the risk of malignancies in real-world settings between exclusive immunosuppressant (IS) and immunomodulator (IM) use in multiple sclerosis (MS).

METHODS

A nested case-control study was designed within a new-user cohort of all patients with MS who initiated a first IM or IS between 2008 and 2014, and without cancer history, using the information of the SNDS nationwide French claims database. Incident cancer cases were matched with up to six controls on year of birth, sex, initiation date, and disease risk score of cancer. A conditional logistic regression (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]) was used to compare exclusive IS versus IM use during follow-up and according to three use durations.

RESULTS

From 28 720 newly treated patients with MS, 407 incident cancers were observed during the follow-up with 2324 matched controls. A significant increase in cancer risk was observed for IS compared with IM (1.36 [1.05, 1.77]), with similar increases for the first 2 years of use but not for ≥2 years (1.06 [0.65, 1.75]). Similar increase was also observed for IS with indications other than MS (1.37 [1.04, 1.81]) but not for IS indicated only in MS (1.03 [0.45, 2.34]).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with IM, a 37% increase in cancer risk was observed for IS with indications other than MS and used for a short duration (≤2 years) but not for IS indicated only in MS. The absence of risk for prolonged exposure of IS with indications other than MS is not in favor of a causal relation with these drugs.

[Multiple sclerosis and melanoma]

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune progressive demyelinating disease of the central nervous system, mainly in young people. The clinical picture of MS has a variety of neurological symptoms, which manifests itself during periods of exacerbation or progression and stabilizes at the moments of remission. The widespread introduction of new drugs with immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory mechanisms of action has led to the development of special risk management plans for monitoring patients during therapy and preventing adverse events and new comorbid conditions. This article presents a review of the literature and a case report on the combination of MS and melanoma in patients. Melanoma can rarely develop in patients treated with DMD, so it is necessary to introduce such a specialist in dermatology and venereology into a multidisciplinary team.

Concurrent CNS tumors and multiple sclerosis: retrospective single-center cohort study and lessons for the clinical management

Introduction

The concurrent presence of both central nervous system (CNS) tumors and multiple sclerosis (MS) poses various diagnostic and therapeutic pitfalls and makes the clinical management of such patients challenging.

Methods

In this retrospective, single-center cohort study, we searched our clinical databases (2006–2019) for patients with concurrent CNS tumors and MS and described their disease courses. Age at diagnosis of the respective disease and probabilities for MS disease activity events (DAEs) with vs. without prior tumor-specific therapy were tested pairwise using t-test for dependent samples and exact binomial test.

Results

N = 16 patients with concurrent CNS tumors and MS were identified. MS diagnosis preceded the CNS oncological diagnosis by an average of 9 years (p = 0.004). More DAEs occurred in patients without prior chemotherapy (83.3%) than in patients with prior chemotherapy (16.7%; p = 0.008). This effect did not reach significance for patients with prior radiation therapy/radiosurgery (66.7% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.238). The average interval between DAEs and the last documented lymphopenia was 32.25 weeks.

Conclusions

This study describes the clinical and demographic features of patients with concurrent CNS tumors and MS and suggests several practical approaches to their clinical management. Our findings suggest that adding a disease-modifying MS therapy to the regimen of patients treated with chemotherapy is necessary only if the patient suffers from a highly active, aggressive course of MS. In view of the lack of prospective trials, individual risk assessments should remain the foundation of the decision on MS treatment in concurrent CNS tumor diseases.