1
|
Lau HSH, Tan VKM, Tan BKT, Sim Y, Quist J, Thike AA, Tan PH, Pervaiz S, Grigoriadis A, Sabapathy K. Adipose-enriched peri-tumoral stroma, in contrast to myofibroblast-enriched stroma, prognosticates poorer survival in breast cancers. NPJ Breast Cancer 2023; 9:84. [PMID: 37863888 PMCID: PMC10589339 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-023-00590-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite our understanding of the genetic basis of intra-tumoral heterogeneity, the role of stromal heterogeneity arising from an altered tumor microenvironment in affecting tumorigenesis is poorly understood. In particular, extensive study on the peri-tumoral stroma in the morphologically normal tissues surrounding the tumor is lacking. Here, we examine the heterogeneity in tumors and peri-tumoral stroma from 8 ER+/PR+/HER2- invasive breast carcinomas, through multi-region transcriptomic profiling by microarray. We describe the regional heterogeneity observed at the intrinsic molecular subtype, pathway enrichment, and cell type composition levels within each tumor and its peri-tumoral region, up to 7 cm from the tumor margins. Moreover, we identify a pro-inflammatory adipose-enriched peri-tumoral subtype which was significantly associated with poorer overall survival in breast cancer patients, in contrast to an adaptive immune cell- and myofibroblast-enriched subtype. These data together suggest that peri-tumoral heterogeneity may be an important determinant of the evolution and treatment of breast cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Si Hui Lau
- Divisions of Cellular & Molecular Research, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Department of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Cancer Bioinformatics, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Veronique Kiak Mien Tan
- Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
- Department of Breast Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, 168753, Singapore
| | - Benita Kiat Tee Tan
- Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
- Department of Breast Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, 168753, Singapore
- Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore, 544886, Singapore
| | - Yirong Sim
- Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
- Department of Breast Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, 168753, Singapore
| | - Jelmar Quist
- Cancer Bioinformatics, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
- Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Aye Aye Thike
- Division of Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
| | - Puay Hoon Tan
- Division of Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
| | - Shazib Pervaiz
- Department of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- NUS Centre for Cancer Research (N2CR), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| | - Anita Grigoriadis
- Cancer Bioinformatics, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
- Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Kanaga Sabapathy
- Divisions of Cellular & Molecular Research, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, 168583, Singapore.
- School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 637551, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Singh N, Joshi P, Gupta A, Marak JR, Singh DK. Evaluation of volumetric breast density as a risk factor for breast carcinoma in pre- and postmenopausal women, its association with hormone receptor status and breast carcinoma subtypes defined by histology and tumor markers. THE EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE 2022. [DOI: 10.1186/s43055-022-00759-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Mammographic breast density is acknowledged as an independent risk factor for breast cancer. Its association with different pathological types and tumors markers is still under evaluation. This study aims to assess the associations of volumetric density grades (VDG) with breast cancer risk in premenopausal and postmenopausal age groups separately. We also aim to assess the association of VDG with hormone receptor status and breast cancer subtypes defined by histology and tumor markers (ER, PR, Her 2-neu and Ki 67).
Results
This retrospective study was done with inclusion of two comparable groups of 185 breast cancer cases and 244 healthy controls. These groups were further divided into pre‑ and postmenopausal subgroups. Mammograms of the cases and controls were evaluated by fully automated volumetric breast density software-VOLPARA and classified into four VDG. The hormone receptor status and breast cancer subtypes defined by histological features and tumor markers in the various VDG were also evaluated. The risk of developing carcinoma was significantly higher in women with high-density breasts (VDG-c + VDG-d) as compared with low-density breasts (VDG-a + VDG-b) in both premenopausal and postmenopausal subgroups. No significant difference was seen in the histopathological characteristics of breast cancer among various VDG.
Conclusions
Our study suggests positive association between high VDG and risk of cancer in both premenopausal and postmenopausal group of Indian women. The hormone receptor status and breast cancer subtypes defined by histology and tumor markers did not reveal any relation to the grades of breast density.
Collapse
|
3
|
Mammographic density changes during neoadjuvant breast cancer treatment: NeoDense, a prospective study in Sweden. Breast 2020; 53:33-41. [PMID: 32563178 PMCID: PMC7375568 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Revised: 05/26/2020] [Accepted: 05/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess if mammographic density (MD) changes during neoadjuvant breast cancer treatment and is predictive of a pathological complete response (pCR). METHODS We prospectively included 200 breast cancer patients assigned to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in the NeoDense study (2014-2019). Raw data mammograms were used to assess MD with a fully automated volumetric method and radiologists categorized MD using the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), 5th Edition. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) for pCR comparing BI-RADS categories c vs. a, b, and d as well as with a 0.5% change in percent dense volume adjusting for baseline characteristics. RESULTS The overall median age was 53.1 years, and 48% of study participants were premenopausal pre-NACT. A total of 23% (N = 45) of the patients accomplished pCR following NACT. Patients with very dense breasts (BI-RADS d) were more likely to have a positive axillary lymph node status at diagnosis: 89% of the patients with very dense breasts compared to 72% in the entire cohort. A total of 74% of patients decreased their absolute dense volume during NACT. The likelihood of accomplishing pCR following NACT was independent of volumetric MD at diagnosis and change in volumetric MD during treatment. No trend was observed between decreasing density according to BI-RADS and the likelihood of accomplishing pCR following NACT. CONCLUSIONS The majority of patients decreased their MD during NACT. We found no evidence of MD as a predictive marker of pCR in the neoadjuvant setting.
Collapse
|
4
|
Kılıç MÖ, Uçar AY. The Association Between Mammographic Density and Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer. Indian J Surg 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s12262-019-01935-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
5
|
A review of the influence of mammographic density on breast cancer clinical and pathological phenotype. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 177:251-276. [PMID: 31177342 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05300-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2018] [Accepted: 05/27/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE It is well established that high mammographic density (MD), when adjusted for age and body mass index, is one of the strongest known risk factors for breast cancer (BC), and also associates with higher incidence of interval cancers in screening due to the masking of early mammographic abnormalities. Increasing research is being undertaken to determine the underlying histological and biochemical determinants of MD and their consequences for BC pathogenesis, anticipating that improved mechanistic insights may lead to novel preventative or treatment interventions. At the same time, technological advances in digital and contrast mammography are such that the validity of well-established relationships needs to be re-examined in this context. METHODS With attention to old versus new technologies, we conducted a literature review to summarise the relationships between clinicopathologic features of BC and the density of the surrounding breast tissue on mammography, including the associations with BC biological features inclusive of subtype, and implications for the clinical disease course encompassing relapse, progression, treatment response and survival. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS There is reasonable evidence to support positive relationships between high MD (HMD) and tumour size, lymph node positivity and local relapse in the absence of radiotherapy, but not between HMD and LVI, regional relapse or distant metastasis. Conflicting data exist for associations of HMD with tumour location, grade, intrinsic subtype, receptor status, second primary incidence and survival, which need further confirmatory studies. We did not identify any relationships that did not hold up when data involving newer imaging techniques were employed in analysis.
Collapse
|
6
|
Moshina N, Sebuødegård S, Lee CI, Akslen LA, Tsuruda KM, Elmore JG, Hofvind S. Automated Volumetric Analysis of Mammographic Density in a Screening Setting: Worse Outcomes for Women with Dense Breasts. Radiology 2018; 288:343-352. [DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018172972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nataliia Moshina
- From the Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway (N.M., S.S., K.M.T., S.H.); Departments of Radiology (C.I.L.) and Medicine (J.G.E.), University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Department of Clinical Medicine, Section for Pathology, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers (CCBIO), Bergen, Norway (L.A.A.); Department of Pathology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway (L.A.A.); and Oslo Metropolitan University, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo, Norway (S.H.)
| | - Sofie Sebuødegård
- From the Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway (N.M., S.S., K.M.T., S.H.); Departments of Radiology (C.I.L.) and Medicine (J.G.E.), University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Department of Clinical Medicine, Section for Pathology, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers (CCBIO), Bergen, Norway (L.A.A.); Department of Pathology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway (L.A.A.); and Oslo Metropolitan University, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo, Norway (S.H.)
| | - Christoph I. Lee
- From the Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway (N.M., S.S., K.M.T., S.H.); Departments of Radiology (C.I.L.) and Medicine (J.G.E.), University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Department of Clinical Medicine, Section for Pathology, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers (CCBIO), Bergen, Norway (L.A.A.); Department of Pathology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway (L.A.A.); and Oslo Metropolitan University, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo, Norway (S.H.)
| | - Lars A. Akslen
- From the Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway (N.M., S.S., K.M.T., S.H.); Departments of Radiology (C.I.L.) and Medicine (J.G.E.), University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Department of Clinical Medicine, Section for Pathology, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers (CCBIO), Bergen, Norway (L.A.A.); Department of Pathology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway (L.A.A.); and Oslo Metropolitan University, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo, Norway (S.H.)
| | - Kaitlyn M. Tsuruda
- From the Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway (N.M., S.S., K.M.T., S.H.); Departments of Radiology (C.I.L.) and Medicine (J.G.E.), University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Department of Clinical Medicine, Section for Pathology, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers (CCBIO), Bergen, Norway (L.A.A.); Department of Pathology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway (L.A.A.); and Oslo Metropolitan University, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo, Norway (S.H.)
| | - Joann G. Elmore
- From the Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway (N.M., S.S., K.M.T., S.H.); Departments of Radiology (C.I.L.) and Medicine (J.G.E.), University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Department of Clinical Medicine, Section for Pathology, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers (CCBIO), Bergen, Norway (L.A.A.); Department of Pathology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway (L.A.A.); and Oslo Metropolitan University, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo, Norway (S.H.)
| | - Solveig Hofvind
- From the Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway (N.M., S.S., K.M.T., S.H.); Departments of Radiology (C.I.L.) and Medicine (J.G.E.), University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Department of Clinical Medicine, Section for Pathology, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers (CCBIO), Bergen, Norway (L.A.A.); Department of Pathology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway (L.A.A.); and Oslo Metropolitan University, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo, Norway (S.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Moshina N, Roman M, Sebuødegård S, Waade GG, Ursin G, Hofvind S. Comparison of subjective and fully automated methods for measuring mammographic density. Acta Radiol 2018; 59:154-160. [PMID: 28565960 DOI: 10.1177/0284185117712540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background Breast radiologists of the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program subjectively classified mammographic density using a three-point scale between 1996 and 2012 and changed into the fourth edition of the BI-RADS classification since 2013. In 2015, an automated volumetric breast density assessment software was installed at two screening units. Purpose To compare volumetric breast density measurements from the automated method with two subjective methods: the three-point scale and the BI-RADS density classification. Material and Methods Information on subjective and automated density assessment was obtained from screening examinations of 3635 women recalled for further assessment due to positive screening mammography between 2007 and 2015. The score of the three-point scale (I = fatty; II = medium dense; III = dense) was available for 2310 women. The BI-RADS density score was provided for 1325 women. Mean volumetric breast density was estimated for each category of the subjective classifications. The automated software assigned volumetric breast density to four categories. The agreement between BI-RADS and volumetric breast density categories was assessed using weighted kappa (kw). Results Mean volumetric breast density was 4.5%, 7.5%, and 13.4% for categories I, II, and III of the three-point scale, respectively, and 4.4%, 7.5%, 9.9%, and 13.9% for the BI-RADS density categories, respectively ( P for trend < 0.001 for both subjective classifications). The agreement between BI-RADS and volumetric breast density categories was kw = 0.5 (95% CI = 0.47-0.53; P < 0.001). Conclusion Mean values of volumetric breast density increased with increasing density category of the subjective classifications. The agreement between BI-RADS and volumetric breast density categories was moderate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Gunvor G Waade
- Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo, Norway
| | - Giske Ursin
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, CA, USA
| | - Solveig Hofvind
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Moore LJ, Roy LD, Zhou R, Grover P, Wu ST, Curry JM, Dillon LM, Puri PM, Yazdanifar M, Puri R, Mukherjee P, Dréau D. Antibody-Guided In Vivo Imaging for Early Detection of Mammary Gland Tumors. Transl Oncol 2016; 9:295-305. [PMID: 27567952 PMCID: PMC5006816 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2016.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2016] [Revised: 04/28/2016] [Accepted: 05/02/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Earlier detection of transformed cells using target-specific imaging techniques holds great promise. We have developed TAB 004, a monoclonal antibody highly specific to a protein sequence accessible in the tumor form of MUC1 (tMUC1). We present data assessing both the specificity and sensitivity of TAB 004 in vitro and in genetically engineered mice in vivo. METHODS: Polyoma Middle T Antigen mice were crossed to the human MUC1.Tg mice to generate MMT mice. In MMT mice, mammary gland hyperplasia is observed between 6 and 10 weeks of age that progresses to ductal carcinoma in situ by 12 to 14 weeks and adenocarcinoma by 18 to 24 weeks. Approximately 40% of these mice develop metastasis to the lung and other organs with a tumor evolution that closely mimics human breast cancer progression. Tumor progression was monitored in MMT mice (from ages 8 to 22 weeks) by in vivo imaging following retro-orbital injections of the TAB 004 conjugated to indocyanine green (TAB-ICG). At euthanasia, mammary gland tumors and normal epithelial tissues were collected for further analyses. RESULTS: In vivo imaging following TAB-ICG injection permitted significantly earlier detection of tumors compared with physical examination. Furthermore, TAB-ICG administration in MMT mice enabled the detection of lung metastases while sparing recognition of normal epithelia. CONCLUSIONS: The data highlight the specificity and the sensitivity of the TAB 004 antibody in differentiating normal versus tumor form of MUC1 and its utility as a targeted imaging agent for early detection, tumor monitoring response, as well as potential clinical use for targeted drug delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Jeffords Moore
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
| | - Lopamudra Das Roy
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28223 USA; OncoTAb, Inc., 243 Bioinformatics, 9201 University City Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28223, USA
| | - Ru Zhou
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
| | - Priyanka Grover
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
| | - Shu-Ta Wu
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
| | - Jennifer M Curry
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
| | - Lloye M Dillon
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28223 USA; OncoTAb, Inc., 243 Bioinformatics, 9201 University City Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28223, USA
| | - Priya M Puri
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
| | - Mahboubeh Yazdanifar
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
| | - Rahul Puri
- OncoTAb, Inc., 243 Bioinformatics, 9201 University City Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28223, USA
| | - Pinku Mukherjee
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28223 USA; OncoTAb, Inc., 243 Bioinformatics, 9201 University City Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28223, USA
| | - Didier Dréau
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28223 USA.
| |
Collapse
|