Discrepancies in interpretation of night-time emergency computed tomography scans by radiology residents

Patient recalls associated with resident-to-attending radiology report discrepancies: predictive factors for risky discrepancies

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to identify predictive factors for risky discrepancies in the emergency department (ED) by analyzing patient recalls associated with resident-to-attending radiology report discrepancies (RRDs).

RESULTS

This retrospective study analyzed 759 RRDs in computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging and their outcomes from 2013 to 2021. After excluding 73 patients lost to follow-up, we included 686 records in the final analysis. Risky discrepancies were defined as RRDs resulting in (1) inpatient management (hospitalization) and (2) adverse outcomes (delayed operations, 30-day in-hospital mortality, or intensive care unit admission). Predictors of risky discrepancies were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. The overall RRD rate was 0.4% (759 of 171,419). Of 686 eligible patients, 21.4% (147 of 686) received inpatient management, and 6.0% (41 of 686) experienced adverse outcomes. RRDs with neurological diseases were associated with the highest ED revisit rate (79.4%, 81 of 102) but not with risky RRDs. Predictive factors of inpatient management were critical finding (odds ratio [OR], 5.60; p < 0.001), CT examination (OR, 3.93; p = 0.01), digestive diseases (OR, 2.54; p < 0.001), and late finalized report (OR, 1.65; p = 0.02). Digestive diseases (OR, 6.14; p = 0.006) were identified as the only significant predictor of adverse outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Risky RRDs were associated with several factors, including CT examination, digestive diseases, and late finalized reports, as well as critical image findings. This knowledge could aid in determining the priority of discrepancies for the appropriate management of RRDs.

Resident-attending discrepancy rates for two consecutive versus nonconsecutive weeks of overnight shifts

PURPOSE

Recent Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education policy changes no longer limit the number of consecutive night shifts allowed for trainees. Few studies have examined radiology resident overnight performance over time. This study aimed to compare significant resident-attending discrepancy rates for residents working 2 nonconsecutive versus consecutive weeks of overnight shifts. The authors hypothesized significantly increased week-two discrepancies in the consecutive group.

METHODS

For 2020, a retrospective analysis of significant overnight resident-attending discrepancy rates over a 24-week period using database searches was performed for residents self-selecting 2 nonconsecutive versus consecutive weeks. The nonconsecutive group typically had a 7-day mix of days off and day shifts between their night shift weeks. Paired and unpaired t tests were performed with p < 0.05 considered significant.

RESULTS

For the 24 sets of 2 weeks covered by two residents at a time, eight were nonconsecutive and 16 were consecutive. The nonconsecutive group had 75.0% R4 coverage compared to 37.5% for the consecutive group. There were no significant study volume differences between the groups. A total of 27,906 studies (35.3% cross-sectional [CT and MR], 54.9% radiograph plus fluoroscopy, 9.8% US) were performed with 223 discrepancies (0.80%). Overall discrepancies for the nonconsecutive versus consecutive groups were 39/4505 (0.87%) versus 59/9462 (0.62%; p = 0.32) for week one and 46/4732 (1.0%) versus 79/9207 (0.86%; p = 0.60) for week two with no significant differences between the groups by modality.

CONCLUSION

Residents self-selecting 2 consecutive weeks of overnight shifts do not have increased resident-attending discrepancy rates compared to 2 nonconsecutive weeks.