Hybrid Interventions for Pulmonary Vein Stenosis: Leveraging Intraoperative Endovascular Adjuncts in Challenging Clinical Scenarios

Background: Pediatric pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) is often progressive and treatment-refractory, requiring multiple interventions. Hybrid pulmonary vein interventions (HPVIs), involving intraoperative balloon angioplasty or stent placement, leverage surgical access and customization to optimize patency while facilitating future transcatheter procedures. We review our experience with HPVI and explore potential applications of this collaborative approach. Methods: Retrospective chart review of all HPVI cases between 2009 to 2023. Results: Ten patients with primary (n = 5) or post-repair (n = 5) PVS underwent HPVI at median age of 12.7 months (range 6.6 months-9.5 years). Concurrent surgical PVS repair was performed in 7/10 cases. Hybrid pulmonary vein intervention was performed on 17 veins, 13 (76%) with prior surgical or transcatheter intervention(s). One patient underwent intraoperative balloon angioplasty of an existing stent. In total, 18 stents (9 bare metal [5-10 mm diameter], 9 drug eluting [3.5-5 mm diameter]) were placed in 16 veins. At first angiography (median 48 days [range 7 days-2.8 years] postoperatively), 8 of 16 (50%) HPVI-stented veins developed in-stent stenosis. Two patients died from progressive PVS early in the study, one prior to planned reintervention. Median time to first pulmonary vein reintervention was 86 days (10 days-2.8 years; 8/10 patients, 13/17 veins). At median survivor follow-up of 2.2 years (2.3 months-13.1 years), 1 of 11 surviving HPVI veins were completely occluded. Conclusions: Hybrid pulmonary vein intervention represents a viable adjunct to existing PVS therapies, with promising flexibility to address limitations of surgical and transcatheter modalities. Reintervention is anticipated, necessitating evaluation of long-term benefits and durability as utilization increases.

Hybrid Interventions in Congenital Heart Disease: A Review of Current Practice and Rationale for Use

BACKGROUND

Hybrid interventions have become a common option in the management for a variety of patients with congenital heart disease. In this review, we discuss the data that have driven decision making about hybrid interventions to date.

METHODS

The existing literature on various hybrid approaches was reviewed and summarized. In addition, the key tenants to creating a successful hybrid program within a congenital heart center are elucidated.

RESULTS

Hybrid strategies for single-ventricle patients, pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum, branch pulmonary artery stenosis, and muscular ventricular septal defect closure have important benefits and limitations compared with traditional approaches.

CONCLUSION

A growing body of evidence supports the use of hybrid interventions in congenital heart disease. But important questions remain regarding improved survival and other long-term outcomes, such as neurocognition, that might impact widespread adoption as a primary treatment strategy.

Clinical outcomes after the endovascular treatments of pulmonary vein stenosis in patients with congenital heart disease

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) is a condition with challenging treatment and leads to severe cardiac failure and pulmonary hypertension. Despite aggressive surgical or catheter-based intervention, the prognosis of PVS is unsatisfactory. This study aimed to assess the prognosis and to establish appropriate treatment strategies.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed endovascular treatments for PVS (2001-2017) from the clinical database at the Okayama University Hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 24 patients underwent PVS associated with total anomalous pulmonary venous connection and 7 patients underwent isolated congenital PVS. In total, 53 stenotic pulmonary veins were subjected to endovascular treatments; 40 of them were stented by hybrid (29) and percutaneous procedures (11) (bare-metal stent, n = 34; drug-eluting stent, n = 9). Stent size of hybrid stenting was larger than percutaneous stenting. Median follow-up duration from the onset of PVS was 24 months (4-134 months). Survival rate was 71 and 49% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between stent placement and survival; however, patients who underwent bare-metal stent implantation had statistically better survival than those who underwent drug-eluting stent implantation or balloon angioplasty. Early onset of stenosis, timing of stenting, and small vessel diameter of pulmonary vein before stenting were considered as risk factors for in-stent restenosis. Freedom from re-intervention was 50 and 26% at 1 and 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

To improve survival and stent patency, implantation of large stent is important. However, re-intervention after stenting is also significant to obtain good outcome.

Hybrid Pulmonary Vein Stenting in Infants with Refractory to Surgical Pulmonary Vein Stenosis Repair

Pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) is still a frustrating disease with extremely high mortality, especially in children with multiple severe PVS. Hybrid pulmonary vein stenting (HPVS) is a rescue treatment for recurrent and malignant PVS. The aim of this study is to share our successful experience with intraoperative HPVS for recurrent PVS after total anomalous pulmonary venous connection (TAPVC) repair in infant. Six patients were identified between 2013 and January 2018, who were diagnosed with recurrent PVS and underwent HPVS in the operating room. The mean age at the time of the HPVS was 10.3 ± 2.7 months (range 7-14 months) and the mean body weight was 7.9 ± 2.6 kg (range 4.1-10.5 kg). Prior pulmonary vein surgery had been performed on average 2.7 times (range 2-3) in all patients. We used a bare-metal stent (BMS) of 6-8 mm diameter in 15 veins of five patients and a drug-eluting coronary stent (DES) in two veins of one patient. All patients had undergone several elective further pulmonary vein in-stent balloon dilatations or another stent insertion after HPVS. Over a mean follow-up of 17.3 ± 13.7 months (range 6-44 months), all patients maintained patency of stents although two patients died due to respiratory failure not associated with PVS. HPVS is a useful treatment modality for recurrent PVS patient that could save the life and achieve longer freedom from restenosis than repetitive surgical pulmonary vein widening only. Even though the prognosis of severe multiple PVS is very poor, planned HPVS could be a good palliation in this patients group.