Expert Technique: Pediatric Tracheal Surgery

Safety of Nebulized Ciprodex for Postoperative Management of Tracheal Resection

OBJECTIVE

Anastomotic complications after tracheal resection/cricotracheal resection (TR/CTR), such as granulation tissue formation, can lead to severe morbidity. The off-label use of nebulized ciprofloxacin-dexamethasone (Ciprodex) for granulation tissue prophylaxis has anecdotally been used after TR/CTR, especially in pediatric patients. However, its use in the adult population, and its safety and side effect profile post-TR/CTR has not been reported. This study aims to characterize the incidence of adverse side effects associated with nebulized Ciprodex in post-TR/CTR patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent TR/CTR from June 2015 to July 2023 was performed. The use of nebulized Ciprodex (1 mL ciprofloxacin-dexamethasone 0.3%-0.1% otic suspension in 4 mL normal saline) while inpatient was evaluated. Potential side effects were defined as oral thrush, ageusia, arthralgia, and allergic reaction, and were recorded for all patients.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients underwent TR/CTR from June 2015 to July 2023. Of these, 53 (72.6%) had documented Ciprodex administration during their postoperative course. One (1.9%) patient reported at least one side effect, including one instance of skin rash (1.9%) and one instance of allergic reaction (1.9%). There were no other side effects attributed to Ciprodex use.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of side effects related to the use of nebulized Ciprodex is felt to be minimal in post-TR/CTR. Although Ciprodex may have the potential to treat granulation tissue in the airway, further studies are needed to verify its efficacy and safety.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 134:3695-3697, 2024.

Assessing National Trends and Perceived Safety of Off-Label Ciprofloxacin-Dexamethasone Use by Pediatric Otolaryngologists

OBJECTIVES

Off-label use of Ciprodex® (ciprofloxacin-dexamethasone: CPD), an antibiotic-steroid combination solution, in the airway has been reported by pediatric otolaryngologists with anecdotal success. We examined national trends regarding off-label CPD use including prevalence, common indications, prescriber patterns, adverse events, and accessibility.

METHODS

15-item cross-sectional survey was distributed to American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology members from January-April 2022. Univariate analyses were performed to compare responses for users of off-label CPD versus non-users. Ease of access was compared across geographies and practice types using multivariate logistic regressions.

RESULTS

Of the 163 complete responses (26.6% response rate), 156 (95.7%) reported using off-label CPD. Most common indications for off-label CPD were tracheal granulation (87.8%, n = 137) and choanal atresia (82.1%, n = 128). Ease of access was significantly increased in the Midwest (OR:18.79, 95%CI:3.63-1.24, p = 0.001) and West (OR:29.92, 95%CI:3.55-682.00, p = 0.006). Ease of access was significantly lower at tertiary referral centers (OR:0.11, 95%CI:0.01-0.64, p = 0.041) and private practices (OR:0.04, 95%CI:0.002-0.33, p = 0.009) compared to academic free-standing children's hospitals. Two-thirds of respondents reported feeling "Very Comfortable" with the safety profile of off-label CPD; 99.4% (n = 156) felt that the benefits outweighed the risks of off-label use. Seven respondents (4.5%) reported adverse events (e.g., local allergic reaction, cushingoid symptoms) from off-label use.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings (26.6% response rate) suggest that off-label CPD is commonly used by pediatric otolaryngologists, many of whom reported feeling that the benefits of off-label CPD outweigh the risks. Our results establish a baseline for future efforts to assess the efficacy and safety of off-label CPD and to improve its accessibility.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V Laryngoscope, 134:2922-2930, 2024.