Geriatric Patients With Fractures Below the Hip are Medically Similar to Geriatric Patients With Hip Fracture

Lower mortality in distal femoral fractures in the presence of a knee arthroplasty: an observational study on 2,725 fractures from the Swedish Fracture Register

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Distal femoral fractures (DFF) in older patients have mortality rates comparable to fractures of the proximal femur. An ageing population combined with an increasing number of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) will make periprosthetic distal femoral fractures (pDFF) more common. We investigated whether a pre-existing TKA influences mortality rates.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients ≥ 60 years registered in the Swedish Fracture Register with a DFF sustained between March 20, 2011 and December 31, 2020 were included. The study cohort comprised 2,725 patients, of which 650 had a pDFF. Unadjusted 90-day and 1-year mortality was estimated via Kaplan-Meier survival curves. A Cox regression model adjusted for age, sex, and treatment modality was used to investigate the association between DFF or pDFF and mortality.

RESULTS

Mean age was 80 years and 82% were females. The most common injury mechanism was a simple fall (75%). The pDFF and DFF group were similar with regards to age, sex, and trauma mechanism. Unadjusted 90-day and 1-year mortality was 11% (95% CI 10-12) and 21% (CI 19-23), respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated a slightly lower mortality for pDFFs, especially in patients ≤ 70 years. The Cox regression model showed a lower hazard ratio (HR) for mortality in the pDFF group (HR 0.82, CI 0.71-0.94).

INTERPRETATION

In a large cohort of patients ≥ 60 years with a distal femoral fracture, mortality rates at 90 days and 1 year post-injury were 11% and 21%, respectively. Periprosthetic fractures were associated with a lower mortality.

A Comparison of Acute Complications and Mortality Between Geriatric Knee and Hip Fractures: A Matched Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

To compare acute complication and mortality rates for operatively treated, closed, isolated, low-energy geriatric knee fractures (distal femur [DFF] or tibial plateau [TPF]) with hip fractures (HFs).

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. We identified all patients ≥ 70 years from 2011 to 2016 who underwent surgery for DFF, TPF, or HF. We recorded patient demographics, functional status, complications, and mortality. We matched DFF:TPF:HF patients on a 1:1:10 ratio based on age, sex, body mass index, baseline functional status, and comorbidity. We used the chi square, Fisher exact, and Mann Whitney U tests to compare unadjusted differences between groups and multivariable logistic regression to compare the risk of complications, readmission, or death while adjusting for relevant covariates.

RESULTS

When compared with HF, patients in the DFF and TPF groups had longer length of stay and time to index surgery and were more likely to be discharged home. The rate of deep vein thrombosis was significantly higher in the TPF group (TPF = 3.9%, DFF = 1.3%, and HF = 1.2%, P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Geriatric knee fractures pose a similar risk of acute complications, mortality, and readmission compared with patients with HF. Future studies investigating strategies to decrease risk in this patient cohort are warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III.

Treatment options for unstable ankle fractures in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Ankle fractures are the third most common fracture in the elderly. Patients over 60 years are more severely affected by these injuries than their younger counterparts and have a higher rate of complications regardless of the management strategy. Traditional management strategies for unstable ankle fractures include plaster immobilisation and open reduction and internal fixation, with newer modalities such as intramedullary fixation becoming increasingly popular. The aim of this review is to establish the best current evidence for or against different treatment strategies.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing treatment options for unstable ankle fractures in adults over 55 was conducted, with the primary outcome being functional assessment score at 6–12 months (Olerud and Molander Ankle Score). Secondary outcomes were adverse events including infection and re-operation.

Results

The search strategies identified 426 articles. After screening and full text review, four papers met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, providing data on 754 ankle fractures. Alternative treatment groups were tibio-talo-calcaneal nail, fibular nail and casting and were compared to open reduction and internal fixation. Meta-analysis of the data showed no difference in Olerud and Molander Ankle Score between treatment modalities at 6–12 months. There was, however, a significant reduction in the incidence of adverse events (OR 0.59 (0.44, 0.81)) and wound infection (0.13 (0.05, 0.31)) in the alternative treatment groups compared to open reduction and internal fixation.

Conclusion

The current evidence shows no significant difference between treatment modalities for ankle fractures in older adults in terms of functional outcome. Open reduction and internal fixation has a higher rate of adverse events and wound infection when compared to alternative treatments. Therefore, surgery should be carefully considered and if undertaken, in a select patient cohort other treatment modalities, such as intramedullary fixation should be considered.

Geriatric distal femoral fractures: A retrospective study of 30 day mortality

INTRODUCTION

Distal femoral fractures have many of the same challenges as hip fractures, but there has been limited research into outcomes following these. The aim of this study was to assess 30 day mortality following distal femoral fractures in comparison to hip fractures presenting to a single institution Secondary outcomes included risk factors for mortality, post-operative complications and union.

METHODS

A retrospective case series of all distal femoral fragility fractures in patients over 65, and hip fractures over a 5 year period at a single institution.

RESULTS

88 distal femoral fractures and 2837 hip fractures fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In the distal femoral fractures there were 80 females and 8 males with a mean age of 82.4 (range 65-103). The mean age of the hip fractures was 83.7 (range 65-106) and there were 2066 females and 771 males. The overall 30 day mortality for hip fractures was 7.7% and was 9.1% for distal femoral fractures. The risk ratio was 1.1777(95% CI 0.6009-2.3080) (p = 0.6338). There was no significant difference in 30 day mortality between the two fracture types. Of the 88 distal femoral fractures 75 (85.2%) underwent open reduction internal fixation, 5 (5.7%) intramedullary nail and 8 (9.1%) conservative treatment. 11.4% suffered a medical complication. 9.1% patients required at least 1 further surgical procedure. The union rate was 94.3%. The 1 year mortality was 34.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no significant difference in 30 day mortality between distal femoral and hip fractures. Distal femoral fractures occur in a complex group of patients that is similar to hip fractures. They have high mortality and complication rates.

The frail fail: Increased mortality and post-operative complications in orthopaedic trauma patients

OBJECTIVE

The burgeoning elderly population calls for a robust tool to identify patients with increased risk of mortality and morbidity. This paper investigates the utility of the MFI as a predictor of morbidity and mortality in orthopaedic trauma patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective review of the NSQIP database to identify patients age 60 and above who underwent surgery for pelvis and lower extremity fractures between 2005 and 2014.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

For each patient, an MFI score was calculated using NSQIP variables. The relationship between the MFI score and 30-day mortality and morbidity was determined using chi-square analysis. MFI was compared to age, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, and wound classifications in multiple logistic regression.

RESULTS

Study sample consisted of 36,424 patients with 27.8% male with an average age of 79.5 years (SD 9.3). MFI ranged from 0 to 0.82 with mean MFI of 0.12 (SD 0.09). Mortality increased from 2.7% to 13.2% and readmission increased from 5.5% to 18.8% with increasing MFI score. The rate of any complication increased from 30.1% to 38.6%. Length of hospital stay increased from 5.3days (±5.5days) to 9.1days (±7.2days) between MFI score 0 and 0.45+. There was a stronger association between 30-day mortality and MFI (aOR for MFI 0.45+: 2.6, 95% CI: 1.7-3.9) compared to age (aOR for age: 1.1, 95% CI: 1.1-1.1) and ASA (aOR 2.5, 95% CI: 2.3-2.7).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

MFI was a significant predictor of morbidity and mortality in orthopaedic trauma patients. The use of MFI can provide an individualized risk assessment tool that can be used by an interdisciplinary team for perioperative counseling and to improve outcomes.

Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes of Geriatric Distal Femur and Femoral Neck Fractures: Results From the NSQIP Database

Purpose:

To compare and contrast postoperative complications in the geriatric population following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for (DF) fractures relative to femoral neck (FN) fractures.

Methods:

Patients aged 65 years and older in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database who underwent ORIF for FN fractures or DF fractures from 2005 to 2012 were identified. Differences in rates of any adverse events (AAEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), infectious complications, and mortality between groups were explored using univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results:

The DF cohort had a higher proportion of females (81.95% vs 71.35%, P < .001), were younger (79.41 ± 7.93 vs 82.11 ± 7.26 years old, P < .001), and had a lower age adjusted modified Charlson comorbidity index score (4.22 ± 1.32 vs 4.49 ± 1.35, P = .02). Cases with DF and FN did not differ in AAE (20.05% vs 20.20%, P = .94), SAE (12.03% vs 13.19%, P = .51), infectious complication (4.26% vs 4.22%, P = .97), hospital length of stay (7.32 ± 6.73 days vs 7.02 ± 10.67 days, P = .59), or mortality rates (4.51% vs 5.99%, P = .23). Multivariate analyses revealed that fracture type did not impact AAE (P = .28), SAE (P = .58), infectious complications (P = .83), or mortality (P = .85) rates.

Conclusion:

Postoperative morbidity and mortality of geriatric patients who sustain DF and FN fractures treated operatively were comparable. This information can be used when risk stratifying and prognosticating for elderly patients undergoing these procedures.