Patients With Multiple Myeloma Have More Complications After Surgical Treatment of Hip Fracture

Spinal lesions in multiple myeloma: Primary bone tumors with distinct prognostic factors

PURPOSE

Although prognostic factors of spinal multiple myeloma (MM) seem to differ from those of other spine metastases (SpM), the data in the literature remains scarce.

METHODS

A prospective population of 361 patients treated for spine MM lesions between January 2014 and 2017.

RESULTS

OS for our series was 59.6 months (SD 6.0 months; CI 95%: 47.7-71.3). Cox multivariate proportional-hazards analysis showed that bone marrow transplant [HR: 0.390, 95% CI 0.264-0.577; p < 0.0001] and light-chain isotype [HR: 0.748, 95% CI 0.318-1.759; p = 0.005] were independent predictors of longer survival. In contrast, age >80 years [HR: 2.7, 95% CI 1.6-4.3; p < 0.0001], ISS III [HR: 2.510, 95% CI 2.01-3.124; p = 0.001], IgA isotype [HR: 1.475, 95% CI 1.031-2.11; p = 0.034] and IgD/M isotype [HR: 2.753, 95% CI 1.230-6.130; p = 0.013] were independent poor prognostic factors. However, ECOG (p = 0.486), spine surgery (p = 0.391), spine radiotherapy (p = 0.260), epidural involvement (p = 0.259), the number of vertebra lesions (p = 0.222), and synchronous/metachronous timeline (p = 0.412) were not significantly associated with improved OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal involvement in the context of MM does not influence OS. The main prognostic factors to consider before spinal surgery are the characteristics of the primary MM disease (ISS score, IgG isotype and systemic treatment).

Abnormal metaphase cytogenetics predicts venous thromboembolism in myeloma: derivation and validation of the PRISM score

Although venous thromboembolism (VTE) is an important treatment and disease-related complication in myeloma, a validated risk prediction model including disease-specific variables such as cytogenetics or tumor burden is lacking. The aim of this study was to develop a new risk prediction model for VTE in the context of modern antimyeloma therapy. All consecutive patients diagnosed at the Cleveland Clinic between 2008 and 2018 and with available data on baseline candidate risk factors constituted the derivation cohort. The primary outcome was VTE (deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism) within 1 year of treatment initiation. A multivariable model was used, and weights were derived from subdistribution hazard ratios to construct a risk score. The model was validated both by internal bootstrap validation and in an external validation cohort. The derivation cohort consisted of 783 patients. A 5-component risk prediction tool, named the PRISM score, was developed, including the following variables: prior VTE, prior surgery, immunomodulatory drug use, abnormal metaphase cytogenetics, and Black race. The c-statistic of the model was 0.622 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.567-0.674). The model stratified patients into low, intermediate, and high risk, with 12-month cumulative VTE incidence of 2.7%, 10.8%, and 36.5%, respectively. Risk of VTE increased significantly with increasing score in both the derivation and the external validation data sets, with a subdistribution hazard ratio per 1-point increase of 1.28 (95% CI, 1.19-1.39; P < .001) and 1.23 (95% CI, 1.07-1.41; P = .004) respectively. Although the PRISM score can guide clinicians in identifying patients at a high risk of VTE, additional external validation is necessary for incorporation into routine clinical practice.

Mental foramen in panoramic radiography can be a reference for discrimination of punched-out lesions in the mandible in patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma: A cross-sectional study

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematopoietic malignancy characterized by monoclonal proliferation of plasma cells. MM features bony radiolucencies called punched-out lesions (POLs), which require appropriate diagnosis due to increased risk of surgically-related adverse events. Although dental surgeons can identify dental focal infections (DFIs) in MM patients, the prevalence and characteristics of POLs in the jawbone of MM patients have not been investigated. We examined the prevalence of POLs in the mandible of MM patients, evaluated its relationship with MM International Staging System progression, and examined panoramic radiographs as a diagnostic reference for POLs in a single center in Japan. We identified 98 patients (55 men, 43 women) with a median age of 63 (range, 34 to 91) years. Of these, 18 patients (18.4%) had POLs in the mandible, including two patients in stage I (2/37; 5.4%), six in stage II (6/43; 14.0%), and ten in stage III (10/18; 55.6%). The prevalence of POLs significantly increased with MM stage progression (p < 0.0001). POLs confirmed on computed tomography (CT) were also detected on panoramic radiographs. The Hounsfield unit value at the site of POLs was nearly the same or lower than that of the mental foramen. Although the prevalence of POLs in the mandible is low, dental surgeons need to differentiate POLs as radiological findings when examining DFIs in MM patients. Confirmation of POLs in the mandible is possible by CT and panoramic radiography, and the mental foramen is likely to be a reference for discrimination.

Regional or Neuraxial Anesthesia May Help Mitigate the Effects of Bone Cement Implantation Syndrome in Patients Undergoing Cemented Hip and Knee Arthroplasty for Oncologic Indications

INTRODUCTION

Bone cement implantation syndrome (BCIS) occurs during and after cementation of implants and is associated with hypotension, hypoxia, and cardiovascular collapse. In this study, we aimed to identify risk factors and potential mitigating factors of BCIS in the oncologic adult cohort undergoing cemented arthroplasty.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed oncologic patients aged 18 years or older who underwent cemented arthroplasty of either the hip or knee from 2015 to 2020. All implants were stemmed. We classified BCIS into three separate categories: (1) grade 1: intraoperative moderate hypoxia (<94%) or drop in systolic blood pressure >20%; (2) grade 2: intraoperative severe hypoxia or drop in systolic blood pressure >40%; and (3) grade 3: cardiovascular collapse requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Demographics, primary malignancy diagnosis, intraoperative factors including cement timing, development of BCIS, 30-day postoperative outcomes, and mortality up to 2 years postoperatively were evaluated. Bivariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression were performed.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 31 patients (46%) developed BCIS. No difference was found in age (65.5 versus 60.9 years; P = 0.15) or body mass index (28.8 kg/m2 versus 29.3 kg/m2; P = 0.76), comorbidities, intraoperative factors, or postoperative surgical outcomes between those who developed BCIS and those who did not (all; P > 0.05). An association with the type of anesthesia administered and development of BCIS in patients receiving general anesthesia alone (17/24 patients, 71%), neuraxial and general (4/15 patients, 27%), and regional and general anesthesia (10/28 patients 36%, P = 0.01) was found. Compared With neuraxial and regional anesthesia, general anesthesia alone had 5.8 (P = 0.007) and 4.5 times (P = 0.006) greater odds of developing BCIS, respectively. No differences were noted in rates of BCIS between regional and neuraxial anesthesia (P = 0.81).

DISCUSSION

Addition of regional or neuraxial anesthesia may be protective in reducing development of BCIS in the orthopaedic oncologic cohort undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Surgical Management of Multiple Myeloma With Symptomatic Involvement of the Spine

INTRODUCTION

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the most frequent primary malignancy of the spine. We aimed to investigate the clinical presentation, surgical indications and outcomes, complications, survival, and its influencing factors in surgically treated MM patients with symptomatic involvement of the spine (SIS).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Out of 350 MM patients treated at our institution over a period of 12 years (2006-2018), we identified 24 patients who were surgically treated for SIS. We collected data on demographics, clinical presentation, comorbidities, surgical indications, and outcomes and investigated the factors predisposing to postoperative complications and survival.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was 85 months; median overall survival (OS) was 50 months. Clinical presentation at admission included pain (88%), sensory and/or motor deficit (67%), and bowel/bladder dysfunction (25%). Symptomatic pathological fractures were seen in 33%. Predominant surgical indications were rapid neurological deterioration with or without spinal cord compression (SCC), followed by mechanical instability. The majority of our patients benefited from surgery in terms of pain reduction in the short term as well as in the long term. There were 21% patients with surgical-related complications (<3 months). Surgical site infections occurred in 17%, without any obvious factors predisposing to infective complications. Neurological deterioration during hospital stay, especially in the presence of motor deficit and/or bowel/bladder dysfunction, significantly reduced OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Sudden-onset neurological deterioration was the predominant factor leading to surgery. We achieved good short- and long-term pain reduction. Surgery is a valuable option for MM patients with SIS who present with rapid neurological deterioration with or without SCC and/or mechanical instability.

Does Polycythemia Vera Increase Risk of Postoperative Complications Following Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty? A Retrospective Matched Control Cohort Study of 6932 Polycythemia Vera Patients

BACKGROUND

There is sparsity of data on outcomes following joint arthroplasty among polycythemia vera (PV) patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate postoperative outcomes following primary total knee (TKA) and hip (THA) arthroplasty among PV patients.

METHODS

A retrospective Medicare database review identified 6932 PV patients who underwent a primary total joint arthroplasty (4643 TKAs and 2289 THAs) from 2006 to 2013. A comparison of hospital length of stay, mortality, and the diagnosis of surgical site infections (SSIs), stroke, myocardial infarction, acute pulmonary embolism (PE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and other postoperative complications was made between PV patients undergoing TKA and THA and their respective matched control groups.

RESULTS

PV was significantly associated with increased rates of acute PE (2.3% vs 1.6%; odds ratio [OR] 1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-1.75), DVT (4.2% vs 3.6%; OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.20-1.61, P < .001), postoperative hematoma (0.6% vs 0.4%; OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.03-2.28), and SSI (4.5% vs 3.6%; OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.08-1.44, P = .002) following TKA. Among PV patients who underwent a primary THA, PV was significantly associated with increased rate of acute PE (1.9% vs 1.4%; OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.01-1.88, P = .035), DVT (3.5% vs 2.6%; OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.04-1.66, P = .035), postoperative hematoma (1.1% vs 0.6%; OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.22-2.80), and 1-year mortality (2.2% vs 1.6%; OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.06-1.89, P = .016).

CONCLUSION

PV was significantly associated with increased risk for DVT, PE, postoperative hematoma, SSI (TKA only), and 1-year mortality (THA only) following primary total joint arthroplasty.

Effect of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction on Perioperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery

INTRODUCTION

Heart failure is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in hip fracture surgery. The impact of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is poorly understood in this population. We designed a study to evaluate national perioperative outcomes in hip fracture for patients with HFpEF.

METHODS

Patients with hip fracture undergoing total hip arthroplasty, hemiarthroplasty, or open/closed reduction with internal and external fixation from January 2005 to December 2013 were identified using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Inpatient outcomes during the index hospitalization were compared between patients without heart failure and with HFpEF. Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction was included as a secondary comparator. Perioperative major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), defined as in-hospital all-cause death, acute myocardial infarction, and in-hospital cardiac arrest or acute ischemic stroke, were evaluated.

RESULTS

Among 2,020,712 hospitalizations for hip fracture surgery, perioperative MACCE occurred in 67,554 hospitalizations (3.3%), corresponding to an annual incidence of approximately 7,506 events after applying sample weights. Compared with patients without heart failure, patients with HFpEF experienced increased odds of MACCE, adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.69; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.51 to 1.89. In comparison, the aOR of experiencing a MACCE event in the heart failure with reduced ejection fraction group was 1.75 (95% CI, 1.57 to 1.96). HFpEF was also associated with increased odds of acute respiratory failure (aOR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.53 to 1.91) and acute renal failure (aOR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.41 to 1.64).

CONCLUSION

HFpEF confers a significant perioperative risk of MACCE in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.

What Is the Adverse Event Profile After Prophylactic Treatment of Femoral Shaft or Distal Femur Metastases?

BACKGROUND

Prophylactic surgical treatment of the femur is commonly offered to patients with metastatic disease who have a high risk of impending pathologic fracture. Prophylactic fixation is associated with improved functional outcomes in appropriate patients selected based on established criteria, but the perioperative complication profile has received little attention. Given the substantial comorbidity in this population, it is important to characterize surgical risks for surgeons and patients to improve treatment decisions.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What is the incidence of postoperative adverse events after prophylactic surgical stabilization of metastatic lesions of the femoral shaft or distal femur? (2) How does this complication profile compare with stabilization of pathologic fractures adjusted for differences in patient demographics and comorbidity?

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. We identified patients undergoing prophylactic treatment of the femoral shaft or distal femur by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Patients undergoing treatment of a pathologic fracture were identified by CPT code for femur fracture fixation as well as an International Classification of Diseases code indicating neoplasm or pathologic fracture. We tracked adverse events, operative time, blood transfusion, hospital length of stay, and discharge to a facility within 30 days postoperatively. There were 332 patients included in the prophylactic treatment group and 288 patients in the pathologic fracture group. Patients in the prophylactic treatment group presented with greater body mass index (BMI), whereas the pathologic fracture group presented with a greater incidence of disseminated cancer. The odds of experiencing adverse events were initially compared between the two groups using bivariate logistic regression and then using multivariate regression controlling for age, sex, BMI, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class and disseminated cancer causing marked physiological compromise per NSQIP guidelines.

RESULTS

With multivariate analysis controlling for age, sex, BMI, and ASA class, patients with pathologic fracture were more likely to experience any adverse event (odds ratio [OR], 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-2.29; p = 0.036), major adverse events (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.01-2.55; p = 0.043), death (OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.07-3.38; p = 0.030), blood transfusion (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.08-2.27; p = 0.017), and hospital stay ≥ 9 days (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.05-2.19; p = 0.028) compared with patients undergoing prophylactic treatment. However, when additionally controlling for disseminated cancer, the only difference was that patients with pathologic fractures were more likely to receive a blood transfusion than were patients undergoing prophylactic fixation (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.12-2.36; p = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

After controlling for differences in patient characteristics, prophylactic treatment of femoral metastases was associated with a decreased likelihood of blood transfusion and no differences in terms of the frequency of other adverse events. In the context of prior studies supporting the mechanical and functional outcomes of prophylactic treatment, the findings of this cohort suggest that the current guidelines have achieved a reasonable balance of morbidity in patients with femoral lesions and further support the current role of prophylactic treatment of impending femur fractures in appropriately selected patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Anaesthesia for fixation of repeated pathological fractures in a patient with multiple myeloma

The introduction of new chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) has improved the life expectancy and quality of life for these patients in the last decade. Therefore, more patients with MM are being treated for repeated pathological fractures. The anaesthesiologist should continue the optimum supportive care received by these patients in the perioperative period also, by understanding the pathophysiology of the disease, the adverse effects of the chemotherapeutic agents and the guidelines for their supportive care. We report the perioperative management of a patient with MM and discuss the perioperative anaesthetic considerations.