Implementing a Geriatric Fracture Program in a Mixed Practice Environment Reduces Total Cost and Length of Stay

Elder veteran program: A description of a nurse practitioner-led inpatient geriatric consult model

ABSTRACT

This article describes the Elder Veteran Program (EVP), a nurse practitioner (NP)-led inpatient consult service at one Midwestern Veterans Administration (VA) hospital. The EVP was designed to address the needs of older hospitalized veterans and serves as a model that uses geriatric expert clinicians as mentors to grow geriatric expertise. Unique to EVP, nurses are coached to identify high-risk older veterans, initiate the consult process to drive geriatric medical and nursing review, and implement best geriatric nursing practice. As a result of EVP implementation, there was a 13-fold increase in the number of older hospitalized veterans receiving geriatric evaluation. The EVP highlights how NPs lead implementation of an evidence-based program that creates a path for engaging, educating, and growing geriatric nursing knowledge and skill while improving veteran access to geriatric sensitive care.

Geriatric fracture program centering age-friendly care associated with lower length of stay and lower direct costs

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate outcomes associated with an integrated inpatient and outpatient program aimed at optimizing the care of geriatric fracture patients in a mixed community and academic health system setting.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING

This study took place at a tertiary-care, 886-bed hospital system. The Geriatric Fracture Program (GFP) was designed in 2018 using the 4Ms Framework (What Matters, Medication, Mentation, and Mobility). Patients ≥65 years old with non-spine fractures managed by orthopedic faculty surgeons and participating hospitalist groups were included. A fracture liaison team educated patients regarding bone health and ensured ambulatory geriatrics follow-up. Outpatient geriatric visits focused on mobility, fall risk, bone health imaging, and medications.

STUDY DESIGN

We compared GFP-enrolled patients (n = 746) to patients seen by non-GFP-participating physicians (n = 852) and used a generalized estimating equations approach and Poisson models to analyze associations between participation in the GFP program and four inpatient outcomes (time to surgery, length of stay, Vizient length of stay index, and total direct costs). We examined outcomes across all fractures and also stratified them by fracture type (hip vs. non-hip). We descriptively examined post-discharge care outcomes: fall, gait, and balance assessments; bone health imaging; and medications.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS

We collected data through chart reviews/electronic health record extracts from July 2018 to June 2021.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

GFP-enrolled patients with all fracture types had a significantly lower length of stay (marginal effect [ME]: -2.12, 95%CI: -2.61, -1.63), length of stay index (ME: -0.33, 95%CI: -0.42, -0.25), and total direct costs (ME: -$5316, 95%CI: -$6806, -$3826); the magnitude of the effects was greater for non-hip fractures. There was no significant difference in time to surgery. Of 746 GFP patients, 170 (23%) had a post-discharge visit with a participating geriatrician ≥6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

A systematic approach to improving care for older adults with fractures improved length of stay and total direct costs.