The Correlation Between Timing of Surgery and the Need for RBC Transfusions in the Geriatric Intertrochanteric Fracture Population

Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Among Patients With Hip Fracture Is Not an Indication to Delay Surgical Intervention

OBJECTIVES

To compare outcomes in patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) treated within 48 hours of last preoperative dose with those with surgical delays >48 hours.

METHODS

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Three academic Level 1 trauma centers.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

Patients 65 years of age or older on DOACs before hip fracture treated between 2010 and 2018. Patients were excluded if last DOAC dose was >24 hours before admission, patient suffered from polytrauma, and/or delay to surgery was not attributed to DOAC.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS

Primary outcome measures were the postoperative complication rate as determined by diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolus, wound breakdown, drainage, or infection. Secondary outcomes included transfusion requirement, perioperative bleeding, length of stay, reoperation rates, readmission rates, and mortality.

RESULTS

Two hundred five patients were included in this study, with a mean cohort age of 81.9 years (65-100 years), 64% were (132/205) female, and a mean Charlson Comorbidity Index of 6.4 (2-20). No significant difference was observed among age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, or fracture pattern between cohorts (P > 0.05 for all comparisons). Seventy-one patients had surgery <48 hours after final preoperative DOAC dose; 134 patients had surgery >48 hours after. No significant difference in complication rate between the 2 cohorts was observed (P = 0.30). Patients with delayed surgical management were more likely to require transfusion (OR 2.39, 95% CI, 1.05-5.44; P = 0.04). Patients with early surgical management had significantly shorter lengths of stay (5.9 vs. 7.6 days, P < 0.005). There was no difference in estimated blood loss, anemia, reoperations, readmissions, 90-day mortality, or 1-year mortality (P > 0.05 for all comparisons).

CONCLUSIONS

Geriatric patients with hip fracture who underwent surgical management within 48 hours of their last preoperative DOAC dose required less transfusions and had decreased length of stay, with comparable mortality and complication rates with patients with surgery delayed beyond 48 hours. Providers should consider early intervention in this population rather than adherence to elective procedure guidelines.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Early surgery within 48 h was associated with reduced perioperative blood loss and red blood cell transfusion requirements in older patients with hip fracture: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between the timing of surgery and perioperative blood loss, red blood cell (RBC) transfusion rate, and RBC transfusion volume in older patients with hip fracture.

METHODS

From January 2020 to August 2022, this retrospective study enrolled older patients with hip fracture who underwent surgery in our hospital. The demographics, fracture type, type of surgery, time from injury to hospital, timing of surgery, medical history (hypertension, diabetes), duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, laboratory tests, and preoperative, postoperative and perioperative RBC transfusion requirements were recorded and analyzed. According to the surgical treatment within 48 h or after 48 h after admission, the patients were divided into early surgery group (ES) and delayed surgery group (DS).

RESULTS

A total of 243 older patients with hip fracture were finally included in the study. Among these, 96 patients (39.51%) underwent surgery within 48 h of admission and 147 (60.49%) underwent surgery after this time. Total blood loss (TBL) in the ES group was lower than that in the DS group (576.03 ± 265.57 ml vs 699.26 ± 380.58 ml, P = 0.003). Preoperative RBC transfusion rate, and preoperative and perioperative RBC transfusion volume in the ES group were significantly lower than those in the DS group (15.63% vs 26.53%, P = 0.046; 50.00 ± 128.15 ml vs 117.01 ± 225.85 ml, P = 0.004; 80.21 ± 196.63 ml vs 144.90 ± 253.52 ml, P = 0.027).

CONCLUSION

Timing of surgery within 48 h of admission for older patients with hip fracture was associated with reduced the total blood loss and RBC transfusion requirements during the perioperative period.

The association between perioperative blood transfusions and venous thromboembolism risk following surgical management of hip fractures

Introduction

Despite high rates of transfusion reported among hip fracture patients in the perioperative period, the relationship between perioperative transfusions and VTE has not been thoroughly explored. Therefore, we used a national database to evaluate how perioperative transfusions among patients undergoing surgical management of hip fractures impacted 1) deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and 2) pulmonary embolism (PE) risk.

Methods

The Targeted Hip Fracture Database of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) was queried for patients undergoing surgical management of hip fractures from 2016 to 2019. A multivariate logistic regression was conducted using various patient-specific variables to identify risk factors for DVT and PE. A nearest-neighbor propensity score matched (PSM) comparison between patients receiving and not receiving perioperative blood transfusions (1:1) was additionally conducted.

Results

Prior to our PSM, preoperative transfusions were not associated with DVT incidence (OR: 1.48, 95% CI: 0.80-2.50; p = 0.2). However, intra-operative/post-operative transfusions (OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.02-1.56; p = 0.00.30) as well as the receipt of both transfusion types (OR: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.10-2.81; p = 0.012) were associated with an increased risk of DVT. The latter of these findings remained significant following PSM (OR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.04-2.73; p = 0.025). No relationship was demonstrated between PE risk and perioperative transfusion receipt.

Conclusion

Our findings emphasize the importance of perioperative blood management strategies among patients undergoing surgical repair of hip fracture. Specifically, orthopaedic surgeons should aim to optimize hip fracture patients prior to surgical intervention as well as intra-operatively to reduce transfusion incidence.

Eccentric distance zone analysis system: New regional evaluation of cephalic fixator tip location for predicting cut-out in geriatric intertrochanteric fractures with internal fixation

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate an eccentric distance (ED) zone analysis system for regional evaluation of the cephalic fixator tip based on the ED of the cephalic fixator tip referenced to the radius of its own femoral head to predict cut-out in intertrochanteric fractures (ITF) with internal fixation.

Methods

First, we assumed all the femoral heads were regular spheres with the radius (R_FD) of “3” for a complete match of the Cleveland zone system and calculated the ED of the cephalic fixator tip by measuring the distances from the cephalic fixator tip to the geometric central axis in the femoral neck and head on both anteroposterior (AP) view and lateral view radiographs. Second, we defined the maximum transverse section of the femoral head into three zones named ED Zone A with ED less than “1,” Zone B with ED ranging in “1–2,” and Zone C with ED ranging in “2–3” in turns by concentric circles (circles A, B, and C) with the radius of 1/3, 2/3, and 3/3 times of R_FD, respectively. Third, we evaluated the ED zones according to the ED and location of the cephalic fixator tip in the eligible 123 ITF patients with single-screw cephalomedullary nail (SCMN) fixation and then analyzed the correlation between the cut-out rate and the ED zones.

Results

The cut-out rates in ED Zones A, B, and C were 4.17%, 38.46%, and 100%, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression indicated that ED Zone A had at least a 14 times lower rate of cut-out compared with ED Zone B. The cephalic fixator tip located in ED Zone A has a lower cut-out rate than that in Cleveland Zone 5. The cut-out rate in ED Zone A is significantly lower than that in the region inside Cleveland Zone 5 but outside ED Zone A.

Conclusion

ED zone analysis system is a reliable regional evaluation of the cephalic fixator tip position for predicting cut-out in geriatric ITF patients with SCMN fixations and potentially an artificial intelligence measurement during surgery. For decreasing the cut-out rate, the cephalic fixator tip should be located in ED Zone A.

Does patient positioning influence blood loss and transfusion rate in hip replacement for femoral neck fractures? A single-centre, retrospective chart review

Background

We compared blood loss and transfusion frequency between the lateral decubitus and the supine position in patients undergoing hip replacement surgery due to femoral neck fractures.

Methods

We retrospectively included femoral neck fracture patients treated with either hemi (HA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA). We included a total of 626 patients, of which 313 patients underwent surgery in the lateral decubitus position and 313 patients in the supine position. Preoperative and day 1 postoperative blood measures including hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (Hct), and red blood cell count (RBC) were evaluated, as well as transfusion records analyzed.

Results

The following decrease of laboratory parameters between pre- and 1st day postoperative measures was noted: RBC: -0.77 G/L (± 0.5 G/L, median = -0.80 G/L; range: -0.50 – -1.10 G/L); Hct: -7.08 % (± 4.7 %, range: -4.70 – -9.90 G/L); Hb: -2.36 g/dL (± 1.6 g/dL, range: -1.50. – -3.40 g/dL). We did not observe significant differences in transfusion frequency between the two study cohorts (p = 0.735 for THA, p = 0.273 for HA). No influence of patient positioning on Hb-decrease, Hct-decrease, or RBC-decrease was noted in our two-way ANOVA models with consideration of implant type and fixation technique (F(3,618) = 1.838, p = 0.139; F(3,618) = 2.606, p = 0.051; F(3,618) = 1.407, p = 0.240).

Conclusions

We did not observe  significant differences in perioperative blood values and transfusion rates in association with patient positioning in patients undergoing hip replacement surgery for femoral neck fractures.

Level of evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.