Management of Orbital Masses: Outcomes of Endoscopic and Combined Approaches With No Orbital Reconstruction

Endoscopic Endonasal Approach to the Orbit: A Case Series and Clinical Experience Emphasizing the Advantages of the Ipsilateral Mononostril Technique

BACKGROUND

Lesions situated within the orbit pose significant challenges in management due to the confined space they occupy and their proximity to critical anatomical structures. The objective of our study is to assess the feasibility of the ipsilateral endoscopic endonasal approach for orbital cavernous hemangiomas and to comprehend the surgical anatomy of the orbital apex and inferomedial orbital structures.

METHODS

Thirteen patients (8 women, 5 men), with ages ranging from 25 to 54 years (mean 35.2 ± 8.3 years), with orbital cavernous hemangioma who underwent surgery via the ipsilateral mononostril endoscopic endonasal approach between August 2018 and August 2023 were retrospectively evaluated. Demographic characteristics, clinical data, radiographic images, and clinical outcomes of the patients were collected from digital medical records.

RESULTS

The left orbit was more commonly affected (9 left, 4 right). The average postoperative follow-up duration was 22.2 months (range: 6-50 months). Among the 13 cases of orbital cavernous hemangioma, 1 (7.7%) was located in the extraconal compartment, and 12 (92.3%) were situated in the intraconal compartment. Complete surgical resection of the tumor was successfully achieved in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlights the potential advantages of employing a purely ipsilateral mononostril endoscopic endonasal approach for orbital surgery, particularly for accessing the orbital apex and managing medial and inferomedial orbital lesions. This technique holds promise for reducing morbidity and enhancing outcomes, especially when combined with careful patient selection, preoperative planning, and advanced endoscopic skills.

Resection of orbital apex tumours in the medial orbit via four-handed endonasal and transcaruncular approaches

PURPOSE

To report the surgical outcomes of 4-handed endoscopic and transcaruncular approaches for orbital apex tumours located in the medial orbit.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational study included 6 patients (2 males and 4 females; 3 right and 3 left; mean age, 49.5 years; age range, 38-60 years) who underwent excision of an orbital apex tumour in the medial orbit via 4-handed endonasal and transcaruncular approaches. Data on age, sex, affected side, surgical record and complications, and results of pathological examinations, imaging studies, and ophthalmologic examinations were collected.

RESULTS

Tumours pathologically corresponded to a cavernous haemangioma in 5 cases and a schwannoma in 1 case. The cavernous haemangioma was completely removed in all cases, while the schwannoma was only debulked because the tumour attached to the surrounding tissues. The medial orbital wall was reconstructed simultaneously in 1 case and 8 days after tumour resection in 1 case. Postoperatively, the visual acuity improved or was maintained in all patients. One patient without medial orbital wall reconstruction showed significant enophthalmos on the affected side after surgery. Another patient without medial orbital wall reconstruction did not obtain binocular single vision field in any direction of gaze after surgery due to severe esotropia.

CONCLUSIONS

This report indicates that 4-handed endoscopic and transcaruncular approaches are useful for removal of an orbital apex tumour located in the medial orbit. Medial orbital wall reconstruction after tumour resection may be a better option for reducing the risk of postoperative enophthalmos and esotropia.

Orbital resection by intranasal technique (ORBIT): A new classification system for reporting endoscopically resectable primary benign orbital tumors

BACKGROUND

The Cavernous Hemangioma Exclusively Endonasal Resection (CHEER) staging system has become the gold standard for outcomes reporting in endoscopic orbital surgery for orbital cavernous hemangiomas (OCHs). A recent systematic review demonstrated similar outcomes between OCHs and other primary benign orbital tumors (PBOTs). Therefore, we hypothesized that a simplified and more comprehensive classification system could be developed to predict surgical outcomes of other PBOTs.

METHODS

Patient and tumor characteristics as well as surgical outcomes from 11 international centers were recorded. All tumors were retrospectively assigned an Orbital Resection by Intranasal Technique (ORBIT) class and stratified based on surgical approach as either exclusively endoscopic or combined (endoscopic and open). Outcomes based on approach were compared using chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests. The Cochrane-Armitage test for trend was used to analyze outcomes by class.

RESULTS

Findings from 110 PBOTs from 110 patients (age 49.0 ± 15.0 years, 51.9% female) were included in the analysis. Higher ORBIT class was associated with a lower likelihood of gross total resection (GTR). GTR was more likely to be achieved when an exclusively endoscopic approach was utilized (p < 0.05). Tumors resected using a combined approach tended to be larger, to present with diplopia, and to have an immediate postoperative cranial nerve palsy (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic treatment of PBOTs is an effective approach, with favorable short-term and long-term postoperative outcomes as well as low rate of adverse events. The ORBIT classification system is an anatomic-based framework that effectively facilitates high-quality outcomes reporting for all PBOTs.

Orbital hemangioma extirpation via a transnasal endoscopic surgical approach: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Orbital tumors are heterogeneous lesions originating from various structures in the eyeball, including the extraconal, conal, and intraconal spaces. One orbital tumor type is a vascular tumor, such as a hemangioma. Hemangiomas are most common in women aged 20-64 years. They are painless and slow-growing, leading to proptosis. The diagnosis can generally be established by clinical examination and computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging scans. Orbital hemangioma management can involve regular observation of small and asymptomatic tumors or surgery for large symptomatic tumors.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

We report a 20-year-old Asian woman who presented with swelling on the medial side of her right eyelid that had increased over the last three months. A non-contrast head CT scan showed a mass in the right eye's medial wall. The patient underwent a joint operation with an ophthalmologist to remove the median orbital tumor by transnasal endoscopic orbital surgery. Anatomical pathology examination of the tumor tissue identified hemangiomas.

CONCLUSION

An endoscopic transnasal approach is a safe and effective way to access and manage an orbital tumor medial to the optic nerve. It is essential to have a multidisciplinary team with experience in endoscopic procedures. This patient had satisfactory results at their three-month postoperative follow-up. They reported no symptoms, and their CT scan did not show a relapsed mass in the right oculi region.

Combined Endonasal and Orbital Approach for Resection of Orbital Apical Tumors

PURPOSE

Tumors of the medial orbital apex can be challenging to resect. Primary endonasal resection can be limited by requirements for fat retraction and poor angulation for lateral orbital dissection. Orbital resection alone can have space limitations and a limited view for dissection of the posterior aspect of the tumor. The combined transorbital transnasal approach integrates the retraction and instrumentation advantages of the transorbital approach with the optical and space advantages of the transnasal approach.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional cohort study, patients who underwent surgical resection of an apical orbital tumor via a combined endoscopic and orbital approach from 2014 to 2019 were identified. Clinical history, examination findings, imaging, surgical technique, histopathology, and complications were reviewed.

RESULTS

Six patients were included. Patients presented with proptosis (5), optic neuropathy (3), and motility restriction (2). Surgery involved a medial orbitotomy and endoscopic ethmoidectomy ± sphenoidotomy, medial wall removal, and periosteum opening. The lesion was prolapsed into the sinus, dissected at the apex via the orbital approach, and removed through the nasal cavity. Pathologic diagnoses were cavernous venous malformation (4), venolymphatic malformation (1), and metastatic carcinoid (1). Improvement in pain (2/2), optic neuropathy (2/3), and proptosis (5/5) were noted. Complications included ethmoid mucocele and nasal polyps.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined endonasal and orbital approach involves prolapsing the lesion into the nasal cavity to aid in dissection on the lateral and posterior aspects, maximizing visibility of the tight intraconal space. This technique can be performed by a team of orbital surgeons experienced in both orbital and endonasal surgery.

Endoscopic Endonasal versus Transcranial Optic Canal Decompression: A Morphometric, Cadaveric Study

Introduction Decompression of the optic nerve within the optic canal is indicated for compressive visual decline. The two most common approaches utilized for optic canal decompression are a medial approach with an endoscopic endonasal approach and a lateral approach with a craniotomy. Our study is a cadaveric anatomical study comparing the length and circumference of the orbit decompressed via an endoscopic endonasal approach versus a frontotemporal craniotomy.

Methods Five cadaveric specimens were utilized. Predissection computed tomography (CT) scans were performed on each specimen. On each specimen, a standard frontotemporal craniotomy with anterior clinoidectomy and superolateral orbital decompression was performed on one side and an endoscopic endonasal approach with medial wall decompression was performed on the contralateral side. Post-dissection CT scans were performed. An independent radiologist provided measurements of the length (mm) and circumference (degrees) of optic canal decompression bilaterally.

Results The mean length of optic canal decompression for open and endoscopic approach was 13 mm (range 12–15 mm) and 12.4 mm (range 10–16 mm), respectively. The mean circumference of decompression for open and endoscopic approaches was 252.8 degrees (range 205–280 degrees) and 124.6 degrees (range 100–163 degrees), respectively.

Conclusion The endoscopic endonasal and the transcranial approaches provide a similar length of optic canal decompression, but the transcranial approach leads to greater circumferential decompression. The endoscopic endonasal approach has the benefit of being minimally invasive, though. Ultimately, the surgical approach decision should be based on the location of the pathology and the surgeon's comfort.

Does reconstruction affect outcomes following exclusively endoscopic endonasal resection of benign orbital tumors: A systematic review with meta‐analysis

Objective

As exclusively endoscopic endonasal resection of benign orbital tumors has become more widespread, high‐quality outcomes data are lacking regarding the decision of when and how to reconstruct the medial orbital wall following resection. The goal of this study was to systematically review pertinent literature to assess clinical outcomes relative to orbital reconstruction practices.

Methods

Data Sources: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science. A systematic review of studies reporting exclusively endoscopic endonasal resections of benign orbital tumors was conducted. Articles not reporting orbital reconstruction details were excluded. Patient and tumor characteristics, operative details, and outcomes were recorded. Variables were compared using χ², Fisher's exact, and independent t tests.

Results

Of 60 patients included from 24 studies, 34 (56.7%) underwent orbital reconstruction following resection. The most common types of reconstruction were pedicled flaps (n = 15, 44.1%) and free mucosal grafts (n = 11, 32.4%). Rigid reconstruction was uncommon (n = 3, 8.8%). Performance of orbital reconstruction was associated with preoperative vision compromise (p < 0.01). The tendency to forego orbital reconstruction was associated with preoperative proptosis (p < 0.001), larger tumor size (p = 0.001), and operative exposure of orbital fat (p < 0.001) and extraocular muscle (p = 0.035). There were no statistically significant differences between the reconstruction and nonreconstruction groups in terms of short‐ or long‐term outcomes when considering all patients. In patients with intraconal tumors, however, there was a higher rate of short‐term postoperative diplopia when reconstruction was foregone (p = 0.041). This potential benefit of reconstruction did not persist: At an average of two years postoperatively, all patients for whom reconstruction was foregone either had improved or unchanged diplopia.

Conclusion

Most outcomes assessed did not appear affected by orbital reconstruction status. This general equivalence may suggest that orbital reconstruction is not a necessity in these cases or that the decision to reconstruct was well‐selected by surgeons in the reported cases included in this systematic review.

Question: Does orbital reconstruction affect outcomes following exclusively endoscopic endonasal resection of benign orbital tumors?

Findings: In this systematic review and meta‐analysis of 60 patients included from 24 studies, there were no statistically significant differences between the reconstruction (n = 34, 56.7%) and non‐reconstruction groups in terms of short‐ or long‐term outcomes when considering all patients. In patients with intraconal tumors, however, there was a higher rate of short‐term (<2 years) post‐operative diplopia when reconstruction was foregone (p = 0.041).

Meaning: Most outcomes assessed did not appear affected by orbital reconstruction status. This general equivalence may suggest that orbital reconstruction is not a necessity in these cases or that the decision to reconstruct was well‐selected by surgeons in the reported cases included in this systematic review.

Orbital schwannoma management: a case report, literature review, and potential paradigm shift

PURPOSE

To present a case of orbital schwannoma and assess the literature on treatment modalities.

METHODS

A MEDLINE literature search for cases of orbital schwannomas was performed using the PubMed search tool using the search terms "orbital schwannoma" and "orbital neurilemmoma." Papers were included if they were peer-reviewed, published in English, discussed management, and included the search terms. Each article was rated using the scale developed by the British Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. In addition, we present a case report of an orbital schwannoma.

RESULTS

A total of 428 articles were found. 102 met the criteria for inclusion. Only two articles met Level 1 evidence and 16 were important to the clinical care process. We report a case of a biopsy-proven orbital schwannoma managed conservatively with observation over a 4-year period due to risk of cosmetic disfigurement with tumor removal. There has been no change in tumor size and no associated complications during follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a paucity of data on the natural history of orbital schwannomas. Based on our review of the literature, we recommend observation for asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic orbital schwannomas with minimal growth over an extended period of time. For rapidly growing tumors or large tumors affecting key structures causing visual loss, diplopia, aesthetic disfigurement, or patient discomfort, a more aggressive approach may be necessary.

An Eye-Popping Experience Immediately After Intubation: A Case Report

This case presents and discusses a case of unilateral proptosis immediately following intubation in a patient who underwent laparoscopic ventral hernia repair under general anesthesia. The patient developed a right-sided proptosis following intubation when noninvasive blood pressure was measured as 167/111 mm Hg. The operation was postponed, and anesthesia was terminated. Proptosis resolved spontaneously following extubation. To the best of our knowledge, there is no case report of proptosis secondary to intubation. The aim of this report is to increase the awareness of rare complications caused by intubation, especially ocular complications, and to underline the importance of preoperative evaluation.

Clinical Outcome and Technical Nuances After Resection of Orbital Cavernous Venous Malformations-A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Cavernous venous malformations (CVMs) represent the most common benign intraorbital lesions. Enlarging or symptomatic CVMs (progressive proptosis or visual disturbances) are treated by surgical resection. For this, a variety of different surgical approaches have been described. The aim of this study was to present a contemporary series of orbital CVMs treated via open microsurgical approaches.

METHODS

In this study, patients who underwent resection of orbital CVMs between 2002 and 2019 were included. Presenting symptoms were noted and neuro-ophthalmologic examinations performed pre- and postoperatively. For surgical resection, the location of the orbital CVM and its relation to the orbital anatomy led to decision-making for appropriate approaches. A comparison between anatomical location and surgical outcome was performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 35 patients with orbital CVMs were included. Most common presenting symptoms were progressive proptosis (43%) and visual disturbances (34%). Most common location was the lateral quadrant (37%) followed by the superior quadrant (20%). A subfrontal craniotomy was performed in 40% of cases followed by a supraorbital craniotomy including the orbital rim in 34% of cases. For surgical excision, a cryo-probe was used in 30 patients, and complete resection was feasible in all cases. Location of a CVM within the superior quadrant was associated with improved postoperative recovery of visual acuity. No differences for clinical outcomes were observed depending on the surgical approach.

CONCLUSIONS

Resection of orbital CVMs is indicated in patients with visual disturbances or progressive proptosis. In these, microsurgical approaches can be used with minimal morbidity for complete removal of these well-circumscribed lesions.

The Endoscopic Transnasal Approach to Orbital Tumors: A Review

Historically, surgical access to orbital tumors has required a transcutaneous, transconjunctival or transcranial approach. Resection of orbital tumors is notoriously challenging due to the surrounding dense network of critical structures in a confined bony cavity. Advances in endoscopic endonasal surgery, initially used for sinonasal and skull base conditions, have allowed for expansion of its applications beyond the sinorbital interface. In the past decade, the evolution of techniques has enabled a purely endoscopic, minimally invasive approach to medially located orbital pathology with good outcomes. With experience and multidisciplinary collaboration between orbit and rhinologic surgeons, this has expanded to allow for a safe and effective transnasal approach to nearly all regions of the orbit with or without assistance from the orbital side. This review summarizes the relevant anatomy, variations of surgical approaches, and literature regarding outcomes of the endoscopic endonasal approach to orbital tumors.

Exclusively endoscopic endonasal resection of benign orbital tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The Cavernous Hemangioma Exclusively Endonasal Resection (CHEER) classification system was developed to standardize prospective outcome analysis following orbital cavernous hemangioma (OCH) resection. The goal of this study was to retroactively apply the CHEER system to all prior existing reports of endoscopic resection of primary benign orbital tumors (BOTs) to: (1) compare patient presentations, perioperative characteristics, and outcomes between OCH and other BOTs; and (2) determine whether the CHEER categorization regime could be expanded to other BOTs.

METHODS

A systematic review of studies reporting exclusively endoscopic resections of OCH and other BOTs (eg, solitary fibrous tumor, schwannoma, and meningioma) was performed. Patient, tumor characteristics, and operative outcomes were recorded. All tumors with adequate reporting were retrospectively assigned a CHEER stage. Outcomes were compared using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests.

RESULTS

Ninety-three studies met inclusion criteria, and sufficient data were available in 36 studies, comprising 105 tumors (n = 87 OCHs; n = 18 other BOTs). Baseline patient and tumor characteristics, as well as intraoperative and short-term postoperative outcomes were not significantly different between OCHs and other BOTs. Long-term outcomes (eg, visual deficits, diplopia, eye position, and recurrence) also did not differ when controlling for CHEER stage.

CONCLUSION

This review represents the largest collection of outcomes data following exclusively endoscopic endonasal resection of BOTs. Short-term and long-term outcomes appear similar between OCHs and other BOTs. These results suggest that exclusively endoscopic resection of orbital tumors may be effective in a range of benign pathologies. Furthermore, these results support a broader application of the CHEER system to other benign primary orbital tumors.