Comparison of Two Different Criteria for Specific Antibody Deficiency in Patients With Chronic and Recurrent Rhinosinusitis

Evaluation and treatment of rhinosinusitis with primary antibody deficiency in adults: Evidence-based review with recommendations

BACKGROUND

There is clear evidence that the prevalence of primary antibody deficiency (PAD) is higher in patients with recurrent and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) than in the general population. The purpose of this multi-institutional and multidisciplinary evidence-based review with recommendations (EBRR) is to thoroughly review the literature on rhinosinusitis with PAD, summarize the existing evidence, and provide recommendations on the evaluation and management of rhinosinusitis in patients with PAD.

METHODS

The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were systematically reviewed from inception through August 2022. Studies on the evaluation and management of rhinosinusitis in PAD patients were included. An iterative review process was utilized in accordance with EBRR guidelines. Levels of evidence and recommendations on the evaluation and management principles for PAD were generated.

RESULTS

A total of 42 studies were included in this evidence-based review. These studies were evaluated on incidence of PAD in rhinosinusitis patients, incidence of rhinosinusitis in PAD patients, and on the different treatment modalities used and their outcome. The aggregate quality of evidence was varied across reviewed domains.

CONCLUSION

Based on the currently available evidence, PAD can occur in up to 50% of patients with recalcitrant CRS. Despite the presence of multiple studies addressing rhinosinusitis and PAD, the level of evidence supporting different treatment options continues to be lacking. Optimal management requires a multidisciplinary approach through collaboration with clinical immunology. There is need for higher-level studies that compare different treatments in patients with PAD and rhinosinusitis.

Healthcare utilization for sinusitis after pneumococcal vaccination in patients with low antibody titers

BACKGROUND

Pneumococcal antibody deficiency has been the subject of limited study in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and has not been studied in recurrent acute rhinosinusitis (RARS). The 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) is considered for patients with non-protective Streptococcus pneumoniae titers. We hypothesized that both RARS and CRS patients with deficient S. pneumoniae titers and subsequent PPSV23 vaccination would have reduced healthcare encounters for sinusitis and fewer prescriptions for antibiotics or steroids.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed of patient encounters between January 2011 and December 2019. All patients included were ≥18 and ≤65 years old with a diagnosis of CRS or RARS and pneumococcal titer data. Patients with immunodeficiency and comorbid conditions requiring PPSV23 vaccination prior to the age of 65 were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 938 patients were included. Non-protective antibody titers were present in 75.8% of CRS and 74.8% of RARS patients. 306 patients with deficient antibody titers received the PPSV23 vaccine. 89% of CRS and 90.1% of RARS patients had protective responses. Among 217 patients with continuous data from 2 years before through 2 years after PPSV23 vaccination, a decrease in the number of encounter diagnoses of CRS (p<0.0001) and RARS (p = 0.0006) was observed. Decreases in the frequency of antibiotic (p = 0.002) and corticosteroid (p = 0.04) prescriptions were also appreciated.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with CRS and RARS have non-protective antibody titers. PPSV23 administration significantly decreases healthcare utilization. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.