1
|
Weis CA, Pohlman K, Barrett J, Clinton S, da Silva-Oolup S, Draper C, Lee J, Kumar R, O'Beirne M, Stuber K, Hawk C. Best-Practice Recommendations for Chiropractic Care for Pregnant and Postpartum Patients: Results of a Consensus Process. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2022; 45:469-489. [PMID: 34836673 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2021.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Revised: 01/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this project was to develop a best-practices document on chiropractic care for pregnant and postpartum patients with low back pain (LBP), pelvic girdle pain (PGP), or a combination. METHODS A modified Delphi consensus process was conducted. A multidisciplinary steering committee of 11 health care professionals developed 71 seed statements based on their clinical experience and relevant literature. A total of 78 panelists from 7 countries were asked to rate the recommendations (70 chiropractors and representatives from 4 other health professions). Consensus was reached when at least 80% of the panelists deemed the statement to be appropriate along with a median response of at least 7 on a 9-point scale. RESULTS Consensus was reached on 71 statements after 3 rounds of distribution. Statements included informed consent and risks, multidisciplinary care, key components regarding LBP during pregnancy, PGP during pregnancy and combined pain during pregnancy, as well as key components regarding postpartum LBP, PGP, and combined pain. Examination, diagnostic imaging, interventions, and lifestyle factors statements are included. CONCLUSION An expert panel convened to develop the first best-practice consensus document on chiropractic care for pregnant and postpartum patients with LBP or PGP. The document consists of 71 statements on chiropractic care for pregnant and postpartum patients with LBP and PGP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol Ann Weis
- Department of Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | | | | | - Susan Clinton
- Embody Physiotherapy & Wellness (Private Practice), Andrews University, Sewickley, Pennsylvania
| | - Sophia da Silva-Oolup
- Undergraduate Department, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Crystal Draper
- Undergraduate Department, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Joyce Lee
- Department of Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rupali Kumar
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas Texas
| | - Maeve O'Beirne
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Kent Stuber
- Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wong JJ, Hogg-Johnson S, Bussières AE, French SD, Mior SA. The association between chiropractors' view of practice and patient encounter-level characteristics in Ontario, Canada: a cross-sectional study. Chiropr Man Therap 2021; 29:41. [PMID: 34583730 PMCID: PMC8477501 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-021-00398-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Chiropractors have diverse views of practice, but the impact on their patient profiles and treatment approaches remains unclear. We assessed the association between chiropractors’ view of practice (unorthodox versus orthodox) and patient encounter-level characteristics among chiropractors who practice in Ontario, Canada. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study using Ontario Chiropractic Observation and Analysis STudy (O-COAST) data. In O-COAST, Ontario chiropractors were randomly recruited from a list of registered chiropractors in 2015 and recorded up to 100 consecutive patient encounters. We classified chiropractors’ response regarding their views of practice as unorthodox when viewing “vertebral subluxation as an encumbrance to health that is corrected to benefit overall well-being”; other views were considered orthodox. Patient encounter-level characteristics included: (1) non-musculoskeletal reason-for-encounter; (2) subluxation as diagnosis; (3) duration of encounter (log-transformed for modeling); (4) unimodal manipulative treatment; and (5) patient health characteristics (good health status, some activity limitations). We conducted multilevel logistic regression to assess the association between view of practice and aforementioned characteristics, accounting for potential confounders and clustering of encounters within chiropractors. The multilevel models had two levels (level 1—patient encounter level; level 2—chiropractor level), with level 1 patient encounters nested within level 2 chiropractors. Results We included 40 chiropractors (mean age = 43.4 years, SD = 11.5) and 3,378 chiropractor-patient encounters. The 2,332 unique patients identified had a mean age of 48.5 years (SD = 18.5). Chiropractors with unorthodox views had higher odds of having patients with a non-musculoskeletal reason-for-encounter (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 16.5, 95% CI 3.2–84.0) and subluxation as diagnosis (aOR 63.0, 95% CI 4.2–949.1). Encounters of chiropractors with unorthodox views were 0.6 times shorter than those with orthodox views (95% CI 0.4–0.9). Chiropractor level explained 32%, 75%, and 49% of the variability in non-musculoskeletal reason-for-encounter, subluxation as diagnosis, and encounter duration, respectively. We observed no association between unorthodox view and unimodal manipulative treatment or patient health characteristics. Conclusions Chiropractors’ unorthodox view of practice was associated with treating non-musculoskeletal conditions, subluxation as diagnosis, and shorter duration of encounter. Chiropractor level explained a high proportion of variability in these outcomes. Findings have implications for understanding chiropractic practice and informing interprofessional collaboration. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12998-021-00398-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica J Wong
- Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, ON, L1G 0C5, Canada. .,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, 6th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada. .,Graduate Studies, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada.
| | - Sheilah Hogg-Johnson
- Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, ON, L1G 0C5, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, 6th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.,Department of Research and Innovation, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada
| | - André E Bussières
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, 3654 Prom Sir-William-Osler, Montreal, QC, H3G 1Y5, Canada.,Département Chiropratique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, 3351 Boulevard des Forges, Trois-Rivières, QC, G8Z 4M3, Canada
| | - Simon D French
- Department of Chiropractic, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Level 3, 17 Wally's Walk, North Ryde, NSW, 2019, Australia
| | - Silvano A Mior
- Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, ON, L1G 0C5, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, 6th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.,Department of Research and Innovation, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Busse JW, Pallapothu S, Vinh B, Lee V, Abril L, Canga A, Riva JJ, Viggiani D, Dilauro M, Harvey MP, Pagé I, Bhela AK, Sandhu S, Makanjuola O, Hassan MT, Moore A, Gauthier CA, Price DJ. Attitudes towards chiropractic: a repeated cross-sectional survey of Canadian family physicians. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2021; 22:188. [PMID: 34525953 PMCID: PMC8442384 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021-01535-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many primary care patients receive both medical and chiropractic care; however, interprofessional relations between physicians and chiropractors are often suboptimal which may adversely affect care of shared patients. We surveyed Canadian family physicians in 2010 to explore their attitudes towards chiropractic and re-administered the same survey a decade later to explore for changes in attitudes. METHODS A 50-item survey administered to a random sample of Canadian family physicians in 2010, and again in 2019, that inquired about demographic variables, knowledge and use of chiropractic. Imbedded in our survey was a 20-item chiropractic attitude questionnaire (CAQ); scores could range from 0 to 80 with higher scores indicating more positive attitudes toward chiropractic. We constructed a multivariable regression model to explore factors associated with CAQ scores. RESULTS Among eligible physicians, 251 of 685 in 2010 (37% response rate) and 162 of 2429 in 2019 (7% response rate) provided a completed survey. Approximately half of respondents (48%) endorsed a positive impression of chiropractic, 27% were uncertain, and 25% held negative views. Most respondents (72%) referred at least some patients for chiropractic care, mainly due to patient request or lack of response to medical care. Most physicians believed that chiropractors provide effective therapy for some musculoskeletal complaints (84%) and disagreed that chiropractic care was beneficial for non-musculoskeletal conditions (77%). The majority agreed that chiropractic care was a useful supplement to conventional care (65%) but most respondents (59%) also indicated that practice diversity among chiropractors presented a barrier to interprofessional collaboration. In our adjusted regression model, attitudes towards chiropractic showed trivial improvement from 2010 to 2019 (0.31 points on the 80-point CAQ; 95%CI 0.001 to 0.62). More negative attitudes were associated with older age (- 1.55 points for each 10-year increment from age 28; 95%CI - 2.67 to - 0.44), belief that adverse events are common with chiropractic care (- 1.41 points; 95% CI - 2.59 to - 0.23) and reported use of the research literature (- 6.04 points; 95% CI - 8.47 to - 3.61) or medical school (- 5.03 points; 95% CI - 7.89 to - 2.18) as sources of knowledge on chiropractic. More positive attitudes were associated with endorsing a relationship with a specific chiropractor (5.24 points; 95% CI 2.85 to 7.64), family and friends (4.06 points; 95% CI 1.53 to 6.60), or personal treatment experience (4.63 points; 95% CI 2.14 to 7.11) as sources of information regarding chiropractic. CONCLUSIONS Although generally positive, Canadian family physicians' attitudes towards chiropractic are diverse, and most physicians felt that practice diversity among chiropractors was a barrier to interprofessional collaboration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason W Busse
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. .,Department of Anesthesia, Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, HSC-2V9, 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
| | | | - Brian Vinh
- Department of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Vivienne Lee
- The School of Interdisciplinary Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Lina Abril
- Department of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Albana Canga
- Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - John J Riva
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Daniel Viggiani
- Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Marc Dilauro
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Marie-Pierre Harvey
- Département de chiropratique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, QC, Trois-Rivières, Canada
| | - Isabelle Pagé
- Département de chiropratique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, QC, Trois-Rivières, Canada.,Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (Cirris), Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Avneet K Bhela
- Department of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Serena Sandhu
- Department of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Ainsley Moore
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - David J Price
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chiropractic Care for the Pregnant Body. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2021; 64:602-610. [PMID: 33882524 DOI: 10.1097/grf.0000000000000621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Chiropractic care is a commonly used treatment modality for musculoskeletal pain in pregnancy. Low back pain, pelvic pain, and other neuromuscular complaints are prevalent in pregnancy and contribute to significant maternal discomfort in many women. Nonpharmacologic therapies to relieve pain are increasingly important during pregnancy because of the opioid epidemic. Chiropractic treatment is one of the potential therapies that offers intervention without medications. This article provides an evidence-based review of the epidemiology of chiropractic use in obstetrics, commonly treated conditions, related physiology of pregnancy, and safety of spinal manipulation.
Collapse
|
5
|
Chiropractic Care of Adults With Postpartum-Related Low Back, Pelvic Girdle, or Combination Pain: A Systematic Review. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2020; 43:732-743. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2020.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2019] [Revised: 02/24/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
6
|
Salsbury SA, Vining RD, Gosselin D, Goertz CM. Be good, communicate, and collaborate: a qualitative analysis of stakeholder perspectives on adding a chiropractor to the multidisciplinary rehabilitation team. Chiropr Man Therap 2018; 26:29. [PMID: 29977521 PMCID: PMC6014012 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-018-0200-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2018] [Accepted: 06/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background While chiropractors are integrating into multidisciplinary settings with increasing frequency, the perceptions of medical providers and patients toward adding chiropractors to existing healthcare teams is not well-understood. This study explored the qualities preferred in a chiropractor by key stakeholders in a neurorehabilitation setting. Methods This qualitative analysis was part of a multi-phase, organizational case study designed to evaluate the planned integration of a chiropractor into a multidisciplinary rehabilitation team. The setting was a 62-bed rehabilitation specialty hospital located in the northeastern United States. Participants included patients, families, community members, and professional staff of the administrative, medical, nursing, and therapy departments. Data collection consisted of audiotaped, individual interviews and profession-specific focus groups guided by a semi-structured interview schedule. Transcripts were imported into a qualitative data analysis program for data analysis. An iterative coding process using thematic content analysis categorized key themes and domains. Results Sixty participants were interviewed in June 2015, including 48 staff members, 6 patients, 4 family members, and 2 community members. Our analysis generated a conceptual model of The Preferred Chiropractor for Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation Settings composed of 5 domains and 13 themes. The central domain, Patient-Centeredness, or the provision of healthcare that is respectful, responsive, and inclusive of the patient’s values, preferences, and needs, was mentioned in all interviews and linked to all other themes. The Professional Qualities domain highlighted clinical acumen, efficacious treatment, and being a safe practitioner. Interpersonal Qualities encouraged chiropractors to offer patients their comforting patience, familiar connections, and emotional intelligence. Interprofessional Qualities emphasized teamwork, resourcefulness, and openness to feedback as characteristics to enhance the chiropractor’s ability to work within an interdisciplinary setting. Organizational Qualities, including personality fit, institutional compliance, and mission alignment were important attributes for working in a specific healthcare organization. Conclusions Our findings provide an expanded view of the qualities that chiropractors might bring to multidisciplinary healthcare settings. Rather than labeling stakeholder perceptions as good, bad or indifferent as in previous studies, these results highlight specific attributes chiropractors might cultivate to enhance the patient outcomes and the experience of healthcare, influence clinical decision-making and interprofessional teamwork, and impact healthcare organizations. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12998-018-0200-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacie A Salsbury
- 1Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, IA USA
| | - Robert D Vining
- 1Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, IA USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Skarica B. Effectiveness of Manual Treatment on Pregnancy Symptoms: Usefulness of Manual Treatment in Treating Pregnancy Symptoms. Med Arch 2018; 72:131-135. [PMID: 29736103 PMCID: PMC5911176 DOI: 10.5455/medarh.2018.72.131-135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To determine the usefulness of manual treatment in reducing or eliminating pregnancy symptoms during first and second trimester. Methods Manual treatment of the cervical and thoracic spine was performed in a group of 115 pregnant women who developed pregnancy symptoms during normal pregnancy. A rotational traction of the cervical spine was applied. Patients in whom the treatment was unsuccessful underwent second round of treatment after a pause of a minimum 3 days. Patients for whom the treatment was initially successful but later relapsed also repeated whole procedure. Pregnancy symptoms analyzed in this study were heartburn, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, headache, insomnia, neck pain, hyperosmia and hypersalivating. Results Manual treatment successfully treated pregnancy symptoms in 91 (79.1%) patients, it was partially successful for 22 (19.1%), and unsuccessful for 2 patients (1.7%) after the first treatment. After the second treatment, out of a total 56 patients, the treatment was completely successful in 40 (71.4%), partially successful in 14 (25%), and unsuccessful in 2 (3.6%) patients. The highest success rate was in eliminating headache (97.3%), vomiting (95.9%), dizziness (94.5%), nausea (92.9%), neck pain (92.9%), insomnia (91.9%), heartburn (88.8%), hyperosmia (78.5%) and hyper salivating (78%). Conclusion Manual therapy in pregnancy is a drugless, etiological, usually highly effective therapy. It is a low cost, rapid, safe, and well tolerated treatment for pregnancy symptoms which frequently has an immediate effect, thus making it an optimal treatment for pregnancy symptoms.
Collapse
|
8
|
Bussières AE, Stewart G, Al-Zoubi F, Decina P, Descarreaux M, Haskett D, Hincapié C, Pagé I, Passmore S, Srbely J, Stupar M, Weisberg J, Ornelas J. Spinal Manipulative Therapy and Other Conservative Treatments for Low Back Pain: A Guideline From the Canadian Chiropractic Guideline Initiative. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2018; 41:265-293. [PMID: 29606335 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2017] [Revised: 12/18/2017] [Accepted: 12/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to develop a clinical practice guideline on the management of acute and chronic low back pain (LBP) in adults. The aim was to develop a guideline to provide best practice recommendations on the initial assessment and monitoring of people with low back pain and address the use of spinal manipulation therapy (SMT) compared with other commonly used conservative treatments. METHODS The topic areas were chosen based on an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality comparative effectiveness review, specific to spinal manipulation as a nonpharmacological intervention. The panel updated the search strategies in Medline. We assessed admissible systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials for each question using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Back Review Group criteria. Evidence profiles were used to summarize judgments of the evidence quality and link recommendations to the supporting evidence. Using the Evidence to Decision Framework, the guideline panel determined the certainty of evidence and strength of the recommendations. Consensus was achieved using a modified Delphi technique. The guideline was peer reviewed by an 8-member multidisciplinary external committee. RESULTS For patients with acute (0-3 months) back pain, we suggest offering advice (posture, staying active), reassurance, education and self-management strategies in addition to SMT, usual medical care when deemed beneficial, or a combination of SMT and usual medical care to improve pain and disability. For patients with chronic (>3 months) back pain, we suggest offering advice and education, SMT or SMT as part of a multimodal therapy (exercise, myofascial therapy or usual medical care when deemed beneficial). For patients with chronic back-related leg pain, we suggest offering advice and education along with SMT and home exercise (positioning and stabilization exercises). CONCLUSIONS A multimodal approach including SMT, other commonly used active interventions, self-management advice, and exercise is an effective treatment strategy for acute and chronic back pain, with or without leg pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André E Bussières
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.; Département Chiropratique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Québec, Canada..
| | - Gregory Stewart
- Private Practice, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Immediate Past President, World Federation of Chiropractic, North American Region, Canada
| | - Fadi Al-Zoubi
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Philip Decina
- Department of Clinical Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, North York, Ontario, Canada
| | - Martin Descarreaux
- Département des Sciences de l'Activité Physique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Québec, Canada
| | - Danielle Haskett
- Department of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cesar Hincapié
- Epidemiologist, Applied Health Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Isabelle Pagé
- Département d'anatomie, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Québec, Canada
| | - Steven Passmore
- Faculty of Kinesiology & Recreation Management, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - John Srbely
- Human Health and Nutritional Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maja Stupar
- Department of Clinical Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, North York, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Joseph Ornelas
- Health Systems Management, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Triano JJ, McGregor M. Core and Complementary Chiropractic: Lowering Barriers to Patient Utilization of Services. JOURNAL OF CHIROPRACTIC HUMANITIES 2016; 23:1-13. [PMID: 27920613 PMCID: PMC5128005 DOI: 10.1016/j.echu.2016.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2016] [Revised: 07/09/2016] [Accepted: 07/12/2016] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The use of chiropractic services has stalled while interest in accessing manipulation services is rising. The purpose of this paper is to consider this dilemma in the context of the dynamics of professional socialization, surveys of public attitudes, and a potential strategic action. DISCUSSION This is a reflection work grounded in the literature on professional socialization and the attitudes held regarding chiropractic in modern society, to include its members, and in original data on training programs. Data were interpreted on the background of the authors' cross-cultural experiences spanning patient care, research, education, and interprofessional collaboration. Recommendation on a strategic action to counter barriers in patient referrals was synthesized. Professional socialization is the process by which society enables professional privilege. Illustration of typical and divergent professional socialization models emerged that explain cognitive dissonance toward the profession. Questions of trust are commensurate with the experiences during patient encounters rather than with a common identity for the profession. Diversity among encounters perpetuates the uncertainty that affects referral sources. Commonality as an anchor for consistent professional identity and socialization through the content of core chiropractic, defined by training and practice, offers a means to offset uncertainty. Complementary chiropractic, analogous to complementary medicine, provides an outlet under professional socialization for the interests to explore additional methods of care. CONCLUSION The practice workplace is an effective lever for altering barriers to the use of services. Clarifying rhetoric through conceptualization of core and complementary practices simplifies the socialization dynamic. Further, it takes advantage of accepted cultural semantics in meaningful analogy while continuing to empower practical diversity in care delivery in response to evolving scientific evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John J. Triano
- Graduate Education and Research Program, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Stuber KJ, Langweiler M, Mior S, McCarthy PW. Assessing patient-centered care in patients with chronic health conditions attending chiropractic practice: protocol for a mixed-methods study. Chiropr Man Therap 2016; 24:15. [PMID: 27162609 PMCID: PMC4860769 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-016-0095-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2015] [Accepted: 04/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The management of chronic health conditions increasingly requires an organized, coordinated, and patient-centered approach to care. The Chronic Care Model (CCM) has been adopted in primary care to improve care delivery for those with chronic health conditions. Chiropractors manage chronic health conditions; however, little is known if such care is patient-centered. The primary aim of this study is to determine to what extent chiropractic patients with chronic health conditions perceive their care is patient-centred. We will assess concordance with the CCM using the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) survey in study patients. We will also explore perception of how patient-centered the care provided by chiropractors is for those with chronic health conditions according to patients and chiropractors. Methods/design We will use a sequential mixed methods design with quantitative priority. In the quantitative component patients will complete a written questionnaire providing sociodemographic, health status, and health care interaction information, all of which will serve as the independent variables. Patients will also complete a modified version of the PACIC; the average overall score will be the dependent variable. In the qualitative component semi-structured interviews and focus groups with patients and chiropractors will be conducted. A pilot study will be conducted to determine if the modified PACIC will perform adequately in measuring concordance with the CCM for chiropractic care. Pilot testing will also allow for assessment of the interview and focus groups guides. Variables found to be significantly associated will be included in a multivariate linear regression analysis to identify significant predictors of the dependent variable. Qualitative data will be analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis to provide meaning to the quantitative results. Discussion There is a paucity of research describing the extent to which chiropractic care for patients with chronic health conditions is concordant with the CCM. This study will examine this relationship and the perceptions and experiences of patients and chiropractors regarding how patient-centered chiropractic care is for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kent Jason Stuber
- Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario Canada ; Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Treforest, Wales
| | - Mark Langweiler
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Treforest, Wales
| | - Silvano Mior
- Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|