Usefulness of Tokuhashi Score in Survival Prediction of Patients Operated for Vertebral Metastatic Disease

A novel prognostic scoring system combining the revised Tokuhashi score and the New England spinal metastasis score for preoperative evaluation of spinal metastases

Purpose

Numerous scoring systems have been developed in order to determine the prognosis of spinal metastases. Predicting as accurately as possible the life expectancy of patients with spinal metastatic disease is very important, as it's the decisive factor in selecting the optimal treatment for the patient. The Revised Tokuhashi score (RTS) and the New England Spinal Metastasis score (NESMS) are popular scoring systems used to determine the optimal treatment modality. However, they sometimes provide conflicting results. We propose a novel prognostic scoring system, which combines the RTS and NESMS scores in order to predict with greater accuracy the prognosis.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 64 patients with spinal metastasis enrolled between 2012 and 2021 in the Department of Orthopedic Surgery-Spine, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montréal, Que. The new score per patient was calculated as a combination of the RTS of each patient and the patient's corresponding NESMS. The new score was then compared to the actual patient survival period and divided into 3 categories: Low, Moderate and Good prognosis. We then compared the accuracy of our new score to RTS.

Results

In the Low Prognosis group, the reliability of predicting the prognosis was 51.9% in 27 patients. In the Moderate Prognosis group, the reliability of predicting the prognosis was 95.8% in 24 patients. In the Good Prognosis group, the reliability of predicting the prognosis was 100% in 13 patients. Our new score was found more accurate than RTS as the R2 parameter corresponding to the new score was significantly increased compared to the same parameter corresponding to the RTS score indicating a higher percentage of survival predictability for the new score as compared to the RTS score.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that a new prognostic scoring system, which would combine the RTS and the NESMS, is promising in providing an improved accuracy for predicting the actual patient survival, especially for the moderate and good prognosis patients. An appropriate prospective investigation with a larger sample size should be conducted in order to further investigate the validity of this novel scoring system and its overall predictive value.

Quality of life in patients with malignant spinal cord compression: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Malignant spinal cord compression (MSCC) is an oncological emergency that may result in a devastating combination of malignancy and disability. Existing quality of life (QoL) questionnaires commonly used in MSCC literature (EORTC QLQ-C30, BM-22, Brief Pain Inventory, and Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes) may not capture all the commonly reported symptoms and lack specificity to MSCC. The primary objective of this systematic review is to determine unmet patient needs and underreported QoL issues and compile a comprehensive list of QoL issues. The secondary objective of this review is to compile all existing QoL tools and questionnaires and determine whether any QoL issues are not addressed in the existing tools currently used in the literature.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted on Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases between 1946 and February 6, 2023, to compile all QoL issues and existing questionnaires used to assess QoL in patients with MSCC. All study designs were included given that they discussed QoL issues specific to patients with MSCC.

RESULTS

The results of this systematic review identified the most frequently discussed QoL issues in the literature studying MSCC. This included direct symptoms of MSCC such as back pain, paralysis, limb weakness/numbness, and urinary/bowel incontinence. Indirect symptoms coming from radiotherapy treatment such as dysphagia, painful swallowing, mouth pain, dry mouth, diarrhea, fatigue, and nausea/vomiting were also noted. Other symptoms resulting from corticosteroid treatment included difficulty sleeping, blurring of vision, weight gain, and mood disturbance. Patients also experienced psychosocial issues such as anxiety, depression, emotional distress, low self-esteem, concerns about dependence on others, concerns about getting home, and fear about their prognosis and future.

CONCLUSION

This review highlights the QoL issues specific to patients with MSCC and QoL tools capturing these issues. Relevance of QoL issues identified in this systematic review must be prospectively validated by patients and healthcare professionals with experience in treating MSCC.

The Role and Clinical Outcomes of Endoscopic Spine Surgery of Treating Spinal Metastases; Outcomes of 29 Cases From 8 Countries

OBJECTIVE

We aim to report the outcomes and feasibility of endoscopic spine surgery used to treat symptomatic spinal metastases patients. This is the most extensive series of spinal metastases patients who underwent endoscopic spine surgery.

METHODS

A worldwide collaborative network group of endoscopic spine surgeons, named 'ESSSORG,' was established. Patients diagnosed with spinal metastases who underwent endoscopic spine surgery from 2012 to 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. All related patient data and clinical outcomes were gathered and analyzed before the surgery and the followtime period of 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months.

RESULTS

A total of 29 patients from South Korea, Thailand, Taiwan, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Chile, and India, were included. The mean age was 59.59 years, and 11 of them were female. The total number of decompressed levels was 40. The technique was relatively equal (15 uniportal; 14 biportal). The average length of admission was 4.41 days. Of all patients with an American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale of D or lower before surgery, 62.06% reported having at least one recovery grade after the surgery. Almost all clinical outcomes parameters statistically significantly improved and maintained from 2 weeks to 6 months after the surgery. Few surgical-related complications (4 cases) were reported.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic spine surgery is a valid option for treating spinal metastases patients as it could yield comparable results to other minimally invasive spine surgery techniques. As the aim is to improve the quality of life, this procedure is valuable and holds value in palliative oncologic spine surgery.

[Surgical treatment results of metastatic spine disease with using minimally invasive technologies, including 3D video endoscopic technologies]

THE AIM OF THE STUDY

Was to evaluate the results of surgical treatment of patients with metastatic lesions of the spine using 3-D video endoscopic technologies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analysed the results of surgical treatment of 33 patients with metastatic lesions of the thoracic spine using a 3D video-assisted thoracoscopic intervention that was performed from November 2017 to December 2019. When examining patients, the following were used: X-ray of the spine, spiral computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as well as the SINS, Bilsky, Karnovsky, Tokuhashi, Frankel, SF-36 and VAS scales.

RESULTS

The actual life expectancy of the patients completely coincided with the predicted one according to the Tokuhashi scale. Regression of neurological disorders in the early postoperative period (before discharge from the hospital) was observed in 6% of patients (complete in 3%, partial in 3%). When evaluating the results of treatment 12 months after surgery, regression of neurological symptoms was observed in 19% of patients. At the same time, complete regression of neurological disorders occurred in 10%, partial in 9% of patients. When assessing the quality of life on the SF-36 scale, improvement was observed according to the most of the criteria. Also, in the postoperative period, there was a persistent decrease in the intensity of pain syndrome according to VAS compared with the preoperative level.

CONCLUSION

The use of 3-D video endoscopic technologies in the surgical treatment of patients with metastatic lesions of the spine made it possible to improve the quality of life of patients and reduce the number of complications.

Thirty-day complication and readmission rates associated with resection of metastatic spinal tumors: a single institutional experience

Background

This study aims to assess 30-day complication and unplanned readmission rates associated with resection of metastatic spinal tumors.

Methods

Medical records were reviewed for 135 adults who underwent elective resection of a spinal cord tumor. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and tumor characteristics were collected. Tumor pathology was analyzed and diagnosed by a pathologist. The primary outcomes were intra- and 30-day post-operative complication and readmission rates.

Results

Of the 135 spinal tumor resections, 30 (22.2%) cases were metastatic. The most common tumor pathology was bone (13.3%) and the most common locations were thoracic (45.2%), and cervical (32.7%). Most patients had an open surgery (96.7%), with a mean laminectomy/laminoplasty level of 1.9±1.5 and mean operative time of 328.4±658.0 min. There was a 3.3% incidence rate of intraoperative durotomies, with no spinal cord or nerve root injuries. Post-operatively, 44.8% of patients were transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU). The most common post-operative complications were weakness (20.0%), new sensory deficits (16.7%), and hypotension (13.3%). The mean length of stay was 8.8±7.6 days, with the majority of patients discharged home (96.7%). The 30-day readmission rate was 9.7%, with the most common 30-day complications being uncontrolled pain (16.7%), sensory-motor deficits (13.3%), and fever (10.0%).

Conclusions

Our study suggests that weakness, sensory deficits, and uncontrolled pain are the most common complications after resection of spinal metastases, with a relatively high associated 30-day readmission rate. Further studies are necessary to corroborate our findings and identify strategies to reduce complication and readmission rates after resection of spinal metastases.