1
|
Charansonney OL, Al-Dandachi G, Plaisance P, Vicaut E. Evaluation of a new point-of-care diagnostic test measuring inflammation in emergency settings. Sci Rep 2023; 13:19551. [PMID: 37945629 PMCID: PMC10636126 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-46347-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Erythrocyte aggregation kinetics is accelerated in diseases with a strong inflammation component. This study aimed to evaluate whether, in an emergency setting, a new point-of-care test measuring erythrocyte aggregation kinetics (EAK) can identify patients with underlying inflammation. Patients visiting an emergency department and needing a blood exam were successively included. EAK was measured at the point-of-care in 20 s directly on the blood samples collected in regular tubes without any manipulation. The primary measure was EAK's half-life during the first 5 s (EAK5s). Each patient's inflammation status was assessed blind to the EAK test results. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves for inflammation status were built. 268 patients had their EAK5s measured, and a clear inflammation status was determined for 214 patients (65 had inflammation). Mean EAK5s were 2.18 s and 1.75 s for no inflammation and inflammation groups respectively (p < 0.001). EAK5s appears to be a better inflammation marker than C-Reactive protein (CRP), with an area under the ROC curve of 0.845 compared to 0.806 for CRP (p < 0.0001). The Youden threshold for prediction of inflammation was 1.86 s with 84.6% (78.5-89.9%) specificity and 70.8% (60-81.5%) sensitivity. Point-of-care EAK is an easily measured, immediately available marker of inflammation with a better predictive power than CRP's.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier L Charansonney
- Cardiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Sud-Francilien (CHSF), Corbeil-Essonnes, France.
- Clinical Physiology Department, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France.
| | | | | | - Eric Vicaut
- Clinical Research Unit, Hôpital Fernand-Widal, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
He SY, Yu B, Jiang N. Current Concepts of Fracture-Related Infection. Int J Clin Pract 2023; 2023:4839701. [PMID: 37153693 PMCID: PMC10154639 DOI: 10.1155/2023/4839701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2022] [Revised: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Currently, fracture-related infection (FRI) still represents great challenges in front of orthopaedic surgeons, despite great advances that have been achieved regarding its diagnosis and treatment. Although both FRI and prosthetic joint infection (PJI) belong to osteoarticular infections and share similarities, FRI displays unique characteristics. Diagnosis of FRI is sometimes difficult owing to the nonspecific symptoms, and treatment is usually tricky, with a high risk of infection recurrence. In addition, the long disease course is associated with a significantly elevated risk of disability, both physically and psychologically. Moreover, such a disorder still poses heavy economic burdens to the patients, both personally and socially. Therefore, early diagnosis and reasonable treatment are the key issues for increasing the cure rate, decreasing the risks of infection relapse and disability, and improving the life quality and prognosis of the patients. In this review, we summarized the present concepts regarding the definition, epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of FRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Si-ying He
- Division of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Orthopaedics, Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou 510515, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Bone and Cartilage Regenerative Medicine, Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Bin Yu
- Division of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Orthopaedics, Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou 510515, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Bone and Cartilage Regenerative Medicine, Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Nan Jiang
- Division of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Orthopaedics, Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou 510515, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Bone and Cartilage Regenerative Medicine, Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou 510515, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zare A, Sabahi M, Safari H, Kiani A, Schmidt MH, Arjipour M. Spinal Surgery and Subsequent ESR and WBC Changes Pattern: A Single Center Prospective Study. Korean J Neurotrauma 2021; 17:136-147. [PMID: 34760824 PMCID: PMC8558019 DOI: 10.13004/kjnt.2021.17.e33] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Revised: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Postoperative inflammation and infections are common complications of spinal surgery and have similar symptoms. However, postoperative infection may lead to a poor outcome and must be differentiated from postoperative inflammation. The objective of this study is determine the changing pattern of postoperative ESR and WBC counts, and investigate the effects of different variables. Methods A total of 61 patients who underwent spinal surgery were enrolled in this prospective study. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and white blood cell (WBC) counts were measured the day before surgery and on 1st, 3rd, 5th, 7th, and 14th postoperative days. Results WBC counts increased on the 1st postoperative day in comparison with the preoperative day (p<0.001), and they gradually decreased until the preoperative value was reached on the 14th postoperative day (p=0.14). The ESR also increased postoperatively, reaching a peak on the 5th postoperative day in comparison with the preoperative day (p<0.001) and gradually decreased thereafter. However, on the 14th postoperative day, the ESR was significantly greater than the preoperative value (p<0.001). In addition, a significant positive correlation was observed between ESR and age, duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, and duration of anesthesia. Conclusion WBC count continued to rise and was the highest on the 1st postoperative day, after which it gradually decreased and attained normal values on the 14th postoperative day, while the ESR increased on the 1st postoperative day, reached the highest level in patients with and without simultaneous instrumentation on 7th and 5th postoperative days, respectively, and gradually decreased.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akram Zare
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Mohammadmahdi Sabahi
- Neurosurgery Research Group (NRG), Student Research Committee, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
- Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hosein Safari
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Arash Kiani
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Meic H. Schmidt
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Mahdi Arjipour
- Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Govaert GAM, Kuehl R, Atkins BL, Trampuz A, Morgenstern M, Obremskey WT, Verhofstad MHJ, McNally MA, Metsemakers WJ. Diagnosing Fracture-Related Infection: Current Concepts and Recommendations. J Orthop Trauma 2020; 34:8-17. [PMID: 31855973 PMCID: PMC6903359 DOI: 10.1097/bot.0000000000001614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 157] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/09/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Fracture-related infection (FRI) is a severe complication after bone injury and can pose a serious diagnostic challenge. Overall, there is a limited amount of scientific evidence regarding diagnostic criteria for FRI. For this reason, the AO Foundation and the European Bone and Joint Infection Society proposed a consensus definition for FRI to standardize the diagnostic criteria and improve the quality of patient care and applicability of future studies regarding this condition. The aim of this article was to summarize the available evidence and provide recommendations for the diagnosis of FRI. For this purpose, the FRI consensus definition will be discussed together with a proposal for an update based on the available evidence relating to the diagnostic value of clinical parameters, serum inflammatory markers, imaging modalities, tissue and sonication fluid sampling, molecular biology techniques, and histopathological examination. Second, recommendations on microbiology specimen sampling and laboratory operating procedures relevant to FRI will be provided. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Diagnostic Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geertje A. M. Govaert
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Richard Kuehl
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Bridget L. Atkins
- The Bone Infection Unit, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Andrej Trampuz
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mario Morgenstern
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - William T. Obremskey
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Michael H. J. Verhofstad
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; and
| | - Martin A. McNally
- The Bone Infection Unit, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lee Y, Lim J, Choi SW, Han S, Park B, Youm JY. Changes of Biomarkers before and after Antibiotic Treatment in Spinal Infection. Korean J Neurotrauma 2019; 15:143-149. [PMID: 31720268 PMCID: PMC6826089 DOI: 10.13004/kjnt.2019.15.e19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2019] [Revised: 07/13/2019] [Accepted: 07/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The laboratory biomarkers used to diagnose spinal infection include white blood cell (WBC) counts, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP). Recently, procalcitonin (PCT) has been used as a biomarker to distinguish between bacterial infection and non-bacterial infection. We aimed to compare the changes of conventional biomarker and PCT in patients with spinal infection before and after antibiotic treatment. Methods ESR, CRP, WBC counts, and PCT were measured in 29 patients diagnosed with pyogenic spinal infection at our hospital between May 2016 and December 2018 prior to antibiotic administration. After antibiotic administration, the values were followed up for 4 weeks at 1-week intervals. Results A total of 29 patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 67.8 years, consisting of 16 men and 13 women. Twenty-five patients had lumbar infections, and 2 each had cervical and thoracic infections. The mean ESR, CRP, PCT, and WBCs decreased at week 4 of antibiotic treatment compared to their baseline values. CRP and WBCs were significantly decreased after 4 weeks of treatment compared to before treatment. The mean ESR and PCT was not statistically significant compared to pretreatment and after antibiotic treatment (p-value>0.05). Conclusion Among several biomarker, CRP and WBCs are biomarkers that can aid early evaluation of the effects of antibiotic treatment in pyogenic spondylitis. Although PCT did not have statistical significance, it can be used as a biomarker that reflects the effect of antibiotic and severity of infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Jeongwook Lim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Seung-Won Choi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Sanghyun Han
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Bumsoo Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Jin-Young Youm
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dowdell J, Brochin R, Kim J, Overley S, Oren J, Freedman B, Cho S. Postoperative Spine Infection: Diagnosis and Management. Global Spine J 2018; 8:37S-43S. [PMID: 30574436 PMCID: PMC6295816 DOI: 10.1177/2192568217745512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Review article. OBJECTIVES A review of the literature on postoperative spinal infections, their diagnosis, and management. METHODS A systematic computerized Medline literature search was performed using PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and EMBASE. The electronic databases were searched for publication dates from the last 10 years. The searches were performed from Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) used by the National Library of Medicine. Specifically, MeSH terms "spine," "infections," "management," and "diagnosis" were used. RESULTS Currently, the gold standard for diagnosis of postoperative spine infection is positive deep wound culture. Many of the current radiologic and laboratory tests can assist with the initial diagnosis and monitoring treatment response. Currently erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, computed tomography scan, and magnetic resonance imaging with and without contrast are used in combination to establish diagnosis. Management of postoperative spine infection involves thorough surgical debridement and targeted antibiotic therapy. CONCLUSIONS Postoperative spine infection is a not uncommon complication following surgery that may have devastating consequences for a patient's short- and long-term health. A high index of suspicion is needed to make an early diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Dowdell
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert Brochin
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jun Kim
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Samuel Cho
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA,Samuel Cho, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, 5 East 98th Street, New York, NY 10029, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bosch P, van den Kieboom J, Plate JDJ, IJpma FFA, Houwert RM, Huisman A, Hietbrink F, Leenen LPH, Govaert GAM. Limited Predictive Value of Serum Inflammatory Markers for Diagnosing Fracture-Related Infections: results of a large retrospective multicenter cohort study. J Bone Jt Infect 2018; 3:130-137. [PMID: 30013894 PMCID: PMC6043470 DOI: 10.7150/jbji.26492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2018] [Accepted: 05/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Diagnosing Fracture-Related Infections (FRI) based on clinical symptoms alone can be challenging and additional diagnostic tools such as serum inflammatory markers are often utilized. The aims of this study were 1) to determine the individual diagnostic performance of three commonly used serum inflammatory markers: C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Leukocyte Count (LC) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), and 2) to determine the diagnostic performance of a combination of these markers, and the additional value of including clinical parameters predictive of FRI. Methods: This cohort study included patients who presented with a suspected FRI at two participating level I academic trauma centers between February 1st 2009 and December 31st 2017. The parameters CRP, LC and ESR, determined at diagnostic work-up of the suspected FRI, were retrieved from hospital records. The gold standard for diagnosing or ruling out FRI was defined as: positive microbiology results of surgically obtained tissue samples, or absence of FRI at a clinical follow-up of at least six months. The diagnostic accuracy of the individual serum inflammatory markers was assessed. Analyses were done with both dichotomized values using hospital thresholds as well as with continuous values. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to obtain the discriminative performance (Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic, AUROC) of (1) the combined inflammatory markers, and (2) the added value of these markers to clinical parameters. Results: A total of 168 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included for analysis. CRP had a 38% sensitivity, 34% specificity, 42% positive predictive value (PPV) and 78% negative predictive value (NPV). For LC this was 39%, 74%, 46% and 67% and for ESR 62%, 64%, 45% and 76% respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was 52%, 61% and 80% respectively. The AUROC was 0.64 for CRP, 0.60 for LC and 0.58 for ESR. The AUROC of the combined inflammatory markers was 0.63. Serum inflammatory markers combined with clinical parameters resulted in AUROC of 0.66 as opposed to 0.62 for clinical parameters alone. Conclusion: The added value of CRP, LC and ESR for diagnosing FRI is limited. Clinicians should be cautious when interpreting the results of these tests in patients with suspected FRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Bosch
- Department of General Surgery, Subdivision of Trauma Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Janna van den Kieboom
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University of Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joost D J Plate
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University of Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Frank F A IJpma
- Department of General Surgery, Subdivision of Trauma Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - R Marijn Houwert
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University of Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Albert Huisman
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, University Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Falco Hietbrink
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University of Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Luke P H Leenen
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University of Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Geertje A M Govaert
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University of Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|